Search results

The actual truth on this would be that those same Baptists that you are saying have defective theology are merely coming to the very same conclusions in their theology regarding what the bible teaches to us as those who assembled together and gave to us Confessions and creeds of the faith, so...

We hold that we are being led and taught by the Holy Spirit, but we are not inventing any new novel theology, as we are just following what has been seen as orthodox in Church for a very long time

This would be the standard biblical and Christian understanding, not Calvinist only , but Christian in general https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-became-sin.html

No Calvinist rejects any of the 5 Doctrines of grace

I just find it so funny that others think that Calvin and others just basically ignored the scriptures and developed entire theology from :man made doctrines traditions and philosphy"

We are not redefing what the bible teaches, but now defining it as was originally taught

The Psa view of the Atonement has been the definite viewpoint since the Reformation among both calvinist and arminian christians, and I do not know what "large group of Baptists" are denying that truth

Problem is Prevenient grace theology is a john wesley model, but not found in the scriptures

Does not mean though that good works have ANY part in getting us Justified, as they FOLLOW once been justified

No, but if they choose to do that, its acceptable

he did not hold to inspiration.inerrancy so would not see him that conservative, but he was still much better then what came out from the critical theology from Germany as fruit of higher criticism

if we do not inherit faith in ourselves while lost in our sin natures, then MUST be given to us by the Holy Spirit

The irony on this is that Psa is NOT Calvinistic version of Atonement, as Again, the the majority view among Fundamentalist and Evangelicals regardless if one hold to Calvinism or not , as its reformed, Baptists and Evangelicals

The basis is His shed blood which appeases/satisfies the divine wrath of a Holy God towards us while we were yet sinners

To bear our sins means that he will experience what ever lost sinner will in judgement, the very wrath fair those sins at hand of a Holy God

Those would be such as NT Wright and His gang, who denied the precious truth of Pauline Justification for some manmade notions concerning Pauline Justification, as they seek to undo the Reformation and substitute their own vain theology

My understanding on what the Bible teaches to us agrees with the vast majority of Reformed, Baptists, and Evangelicals so you Brother are the one choosing to "walk in your understanding" on some important doctrines of the Fath

No, you affirms that the scriptures align up with your church tradition and dogmas, as Rome is is same boat as Sda with their Ellen White, as you force the bible to agree with your Dogmas and church tradition, so its how Rome interprets it, not hat it actually stated

No, we hold to what the scriptures teach regarding things such as Atonement, and we use other sources written by reformed and Baptists who also exegeted that belief straight from the scriptures themselves

There is also a big danger of trampling underfoot the precious blood of Jesus for our salvation, for if one denies that he bore the very burden of their sins, what Jesus are they really trusting in to save from their sins? except that Jesus as the sin bearer became as t were sin for us, so...