Search results

And by the way - it's only a "waste" of time when I am asked ridiculous and otherwise irrelevant questions . . .

Those who hold the KJV as "inerrant" - and there are many - simply live in a world of make-believe. Virtually EVERY translation is an errant copy of God's inerrant word. Just off the top of my head - I san point to where the KJV uses the word "ministering", where "priestly service" is used in...

Really? Can you explain that one?

I merely stated that C.I. Scofield didn't have any formal Theological training before he set out to write his Reference Bible. That is a fact of history - NOT my opinion. I had NO idea that you would be so offended by that . . .

Sooooo, because you couldn't address the NT and historical evidence I presented in posts #21 and #46 - you steer the conversation away from the topic onto MY educational history? Ummmmmm, I'm NOT the one writing a reference Bible and claiming its "accuracy". Pretty pathetic . . .

Hmmmmm, let’s see . . . Is it the fact that, like Scofield – these guys were anti-Catholic Dispensationalists that gives them the “pedigree” to edit a reference Bible? Does it have anything to do with the fact that at least TWO of them - Scofield and D.L. Moody (Moody Bible Institute) were...

And this is simply another asinine and impotent remark. Do you even understand what "Apostasy" is?? Unless you have examples - you are simply blowing hot air . . .

I don't even know WHAT your question is. That's why I asked you about it in my last post. If you are simply asking if I have a degree in Theology - the answer is "No". However - I was calling into question the "experts" that were being cited - when tthese "experts" relied on spurious source...

Thank you for yet another unsubstantiated and impotent a claim . . .

Regarding what? The fact that anti-Catholic Samuel Gipp was an adherent of the Scofield Reference Bible?? OR, the fact that Darby disciple, C.I. Scofield had ZERO theological training when he wrote his bogus work?

And that is as empty and impotent a claim as your last one. Accusations without evidence amount to nothing more than bearing FALSE witness. Good luck with that when you're being judged . . .

Even MORE interesting when an ignorant anti-=Catholic refers to Christ's pilgrim Church as a "cult" . . .

Funny how you anti-Catholics think: “I will spew ALL sorts of filthy lies about Catholicism – but if they put me in my place, THEY are not being charitable!!” Exod. 20:16 “You shall NOT bear false witness against your neighbor. 1 Tim. 5:20 As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the...

You have the unmitigated GAUL to quote a charlatan like the “Rev.” Samuel Gipp, who champions a NON-scholarly work like the Scofield Reference Bible?? C.I. Scofield was an uneducated 19th century rube who fell for the teachings of John Nelson Darby and his “Rapture” claptrap, so he decided to...

Ummmmm, Dean Burgon was a 19th century anti-Catholic with an ax to grind. Chick Publications - the home of the infamous Jack Chick's highly-debunked series of rabid anti-Catholic tracts and comic books, including his laughably false "Alberto" series, describes Burgeron as: "An outstanding 19th...

Answer: the Triune Godhead. Soooooo, this is what YOU deem to be "idolatry"?? Interesting . . .

What a desperately idiotic argument. Ummmmm, in case you didn't know - there are NO extant 1st century manuscripts of the New Testament. According to YOUR logic - that means the ENTIRE NT is "null and void". What a load of manure . . . According to OT scholar Otto Kaiser, the Deuterocanonical...

A Liturgical Rite is "Pagan"?? This, I GOTTA hear. Please explain - with historical EXAMPLES. I'll wait right here as you fumble around for a response . . .

Sooooooo, I guess this means that you could NOT refute the point-by-point ANNIHILATION of your weak case in my last post (#70). So, now - instead of addressing these irrefutable points - you introduce idiotic opinion, historical perversion massive frustration. Good job. Come back when you're...

Well, I see it as being more akin to the politically-correct blunder that lumps ALL people of Latin descent into one category (Latinos) - yet Mexicans are NOT Spaniards or Columbians or Chileans or Venezuelans, etc. - and vice versa. A Coptic or Melkite or Maronite Catholic would be just as...