Search results

let me clarify ... Not only WHO Jesus was, but what Jesus said of His own purpose ... to fulfill the Law. Not to be a conquering military flag officer ... YET Matt 26 I believe is the chapter which addresses Judas' betrayal. If Judas accepted Jesus for who He is ... and what He said His...

touche ... that's what I get for trying to bounce through the pasture to feed cattle and reply to Baptist Board! :P

The title of your thread is pretty clear. answers based upon scripture have been offered with clarity ... and with allusion therein. I fully believe Jesus loved Judas ... and as Petra sang ... our rebellion, our betrayal when we fall (out of fellowship, not out of relationship). The betrayal...

Shazam n Never even heared of that shazam! Course. I never heard Jesus be snide and condescending either. i really gotta get out more I reckon. Thanks bro!

there's good reason to fear this vax. really good reason. but I'll take one in 2076 as you offered me in another thread! ;)

you keep saying this ... and I agree without the Holy Spirit's guidance, the spiritually appraised. But your context seems to be the "Men in Black" deal about "the galaxy" which turns out to be a necklace charm.

Yes I did. Quite directly. NO. Evidently you didn't like the answer ... and then proffered a plausible consideration with regard to time/place of the referenced quote of Jesus. I can accept that. It doesn't impact my salvation nor the Gospel one iota. Thanks for raising the question.

*are very important. So is grammar and syntax. So there's your answer. I apologize for being so insufficient as to provide this consideration ... but the Gospel is quite clear about the security/assurance of salvation. "NO---ONE snatches them from My hand" So, to be out of His hand means...

OK

ditto 37818. I think you're trying to do with this scripture what the anti-gunners seek to do with the 2A ... disregard grammar and read what they want to read into it. Only those who have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ will be with Him forever. Those who have had their...

it's dogmatic(?) to start declaring what one could see ... if only you had eyes like mine. Right? whatever term you want to use ... scripture is quite clear on the existence of a time period whereby Jesus will reign on this post-armaggedon earth for 1000 years (that's called a millennium) and...

No, Judas was not born-again and then lost.

right ..."this vax is no different from previous. " Roger copy.

so you say. test these things ... to see if they are true. Berean style. I didn't say I understood this to be true, but simply seeking to understand why he'd do what he did if he was a spirit-breathed-to-life follower of Christ ... IN THE FLESH no less. Christ even addressed the relative...

I don't worry about it. But if Jesus says Judas was a devil and went to his own place (e.g. separate from the others in the discussion) ... that's good enough for me. ... it doesn't invalidate the assuredness of salvation in John 10:28 because there are lots of cultural christians. Judas was...

I believe Judas was a social follower of Christ. He couldn't have "been saved" because he'd have been John 10:28'd ... assured of salvation. as you've noted, clearly he wasn't.

dude's reference to the eucharist is a bubble off ... but hey, no one is perfect. :) I've shared this article deep/wide. Nice find. I like a lot of the American Thinker articles, but I usually am referred to 'em. This rates in the top 10%. Thanks Aaron.

Copy that ... but we're discussing the literal Return of Christ ... the establishment of the reign of Christ prior to the eternal dispatching of Satan, after Jesus' Second Coming/Wrath of The Lamb.

perhaps, but why would He tell John in the very book titled Revelation ... if there isn't a literal 1000 year reign on this rock as it is (Valley of Meggido cleaned-up by the remaining Jews during the 7 year wedding feast/bema seat in Heaven) ... then what is our reference? I'm no Jewish...

first sentence: totally agree. second ... ??? Jesus has already come in judgement? Then what are we doing here? Is this the millennial reign for a bonus millennium? I sure hope not.