Search results

runs and hides. typical.

Like i said, surprised you're falling for this.

You misquoted. I said, Thanks to media and democrats. link TDS in regard to HCQ and our outlandish ways of counting deaths. I'm just surprised you're falling for this. TDS has lead to the HCQ fiasco and the crazy way we count deaths. Are you in charge of HCQ decisions and counting deaths...

Like I said. I'm surprised you're falling for this.

I did not say you had TDS. I said TDS in media and the democrats caused thousand of deaths? Are you media? Are you a democrat? Kinda funny how you attributed that to yourself. Hmmmm.

Yet another study proving Trump was right, again. Great instincts. Dems and media are responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths. https://www.ejinme.com/article/S0953-6205(20)30335-6/fulltext

Thanks to media and democrats. HCQ use was associated with a 30% lower risk of death in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. TDS in regard to HCQ and our outlandish ways of counting deaths. I'm just surprised you're falling for this.

The Church needs to root this out as well.

That's one reason I'm happy about this development. I think it will create awareness in the Church and force a better discussion on the issue. The Church should see the theological error in this kind of thinking. We know all men are sinners, and all are capable of racism, not just one people...

Wow, 19 tweets and retweets on this by the Prez. Party’s Over: Trump Orders Purge of ‘Critical Race Theory’ from Federal Agencies

This is very good news. My concern, though, has always been the Church. The Church should be at the forefront of battling all kinds of racism, including this nonsense. Not only has the Church been absent it's been infiltrated. Churches are more than happy to address racism, but not this...

Says the blind deaf guy. ;)

Which is why I want you to turn from this false theological argument you're advocating. You are indeed engaging in worldly political rhetoric.

If you're saying you do this in the absence of doing good, political or otherwise, then yes it's a form of pacifism. We should do both. Fighting for abolition didn't hinder the Gospel, it likely created more opportunities for it.

Of course this is possible, but it's also possible you are the blind one. That's why it's a silly rejoinder. Yet another tactic. Conflating the gospel with fighting for the unborn. Wanting to save someone's life does not negate the gospel. In fact, it's a good testimony to go along with...

So you rip me for having a different opinion, but if I opine differently than you it's bare false witness. Got it.

You're right. Your errors have nothing to do with me. I'm showing you your theological errors. I don't know it all, but I do know about the errors you're advocating.

Again, this is the bad theology. You're mixing OT laws on divorce to NT moral commandments about submitting to government. You're comparing moral law to national law. God is not permitting us to give to Caesar what is Caesar because of hardness of heart. You've completely missed the point.

Of course you are. You're saying we should use dirty government to help anyone. It's a form of pacifism.

Governing officials are from God. They are not worldly weapons. Romans 13. This is the bad theology I was referring to. Ultimately, your error is theological. In fact, by ignoring the system God has put in place and advocating for extreme eastern pacifism, it's actually you that is using...