Search results

Did Peter Ruckman make conflicting or contradictory claims concerning variations or differences in the many varying KJV editions? In his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman asserted: “Things different are not equal” (p. 18). In this same commentary, Peter Ruckman wrote: “You...

This is claimed to be the 1611 KJV with only updated spelling. It is edited by Chris Sherburne. https://www.armoredsheep.com/king-james-1611/2011-bible

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/fourteen-gun-myths-that-the-media-repeats-constantly-and-doesn-t-want-you-to-question/ar-AA1VaIh9?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=697a914a79d44e1fb5946aaab69ef546&ei=37...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/spain-legalizes-up-to-500-000-undocumented-migrants-sparking-backlash/ar-AA1VbIlJ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=697a914a79d44e1fb5946aaab69ef546&ei=16...

Through the years, I have been taught that the Pharisees were the conservative Jewish group while the Sadducees were the liberal sect of Jews. In the introduction, Michael Wise, Martin Abegg, Jr., and Edward Cook asserted: "It is certain that the Pharisees, largely a lay movement and the...

https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/ice-protestors-disrupt-minnesota-worship-service/?fbclid=IwY2xjawPbAjhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeJnSWxWn0fH4jNN_Pab4VlrXVv92yM7W41odJzYnH6hV90S71WVlNCHeC9Nc_aem_eD0ca02fGQpOc0YAhcIEnw...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-radical-islamists-and-the-far-left-united-to-fight-america-everywhere-and-all-the-time/ar-AA1UuY0P?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=696e1dc0c0fa4116b4a0e64bf4a32728&ei=50...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/student-whistleblower-sounds-alarm-on-infuriating-course-bias-at-university-of-illinois/vi-AA1Sq0tZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=69415030f2724cd28a59b3d9cc383c0c&ei=12...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/one-chart-lays-bare-the-sprawling-fraud-network-minnesota-officials-missed/ar-AA1Soteo?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=694052f984fe4852af1d896dce72fa05&ei=15...

Douglas Woodward wrote: "[James] Ussher relied upon the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11, as published a few decades earlier (1611) in the King James Bible" (Rebooting the Bible, Part One, p. 137). Douglas Woodward quoted where Henry B. Smith, Jr., wrote: "Ephraem of Syria [306-373 A. D.] is...

KJV defender David Sorenson identified the 1535 Coverdale’s Bible as “a hybrid translation” (Faithful Word, p. 102) [bold type added]. Orlaith O’Sullivan maintained that Coverdale’s “1535 Bible relies heavily on [George] Joye’s earlier translations” of the books of Psalms, “Isaiah, Jeremiah...

KJV defender B=AZX3IczX26Ewem70SmHJ5yRwhnOFFZ58MzdiUJYkryEoeBViEAM3mJnPE1dri4LzQa_WLZkllBqUlCN9py44RK1u4SLXDLlXtL7N4VXbna9-j9aBc2__j5nNGqNIXR6qkaTLCNc67QKsFNNiP_F2Rc8iVwHB97Y4m--wkc_Cv60E4ahxsb4-YOaSU2io5XMAZ7UsC3KAXOrU__CbNngma4-t&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R']ryan Ross wrote: "This is a critical warning...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/wikipedia-donations-go-toward-paying-liberal-activists-to-rewrite-articles/ar-AA1QroVA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6917af1128cf4a73a5cded50a4a4a1a8&ei=21...

After quoting John 6:63, Mike Holloway wrote: “The Word of God, the Bible, is alive because God’s Word is also the Holy Spirit” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 122). Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit...

In the following quotations, the Greek words printed in Greek letters have been transliterated to English letters. Concerning the KJV’s rendering “great things” at Luke 1:49, KJV defender Laurence Vance asserted: “The AV reading ultimately goes back to the CT [Critical Text] reading of magna”...

KJV-only advocate Matthew Verschuur asserted: “One of the most enduring myths regarding the King James Bible is that the common and standard edition in use in the 20th and 21st centuries is the 1769 Edition” (Vintage Bibles, p. 47). KJV defender Laurence Vance wrote: “There are 750 differences...

Concerning Revelation 22:19 in his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman wrote: “All the new translations say ‘tree of life’ instead of ‘book of life.’ Again, the change is uncalled for, the Receptus reads ‘bibliou.’ “Tree of life’ is sheer conjecture. No alternate reading is given...

One sound reason that the modern case for a KJV-only view can be regarded to be flawed and even broken is KJV-only reasoning’s dependence upon use of fallacies. The chain of arguments for a KJV-only view can be no stronger than its weakest links. Some premises that underlie KJV-only conclusions...