Search results

Sorry, written in haste!

T'other side of t'coin: Why the man who drafted the IHRA definition condemns its use Hardly surprising that Griffin and his far right troglodytes have made the schoolboy error of conflating anti-Zionism with anti-semitism: they are, after all, not very bright.... Corbyn's made his own errors...

Welshing on a deal isn't, but their singing is out of this world

So maybe you think this is 'titillating': Police officer who breastfed crying baby in a hospital is hailed a hero Me, I just think it's great and a truly heartwarming tale: the officer surely deserves her promotion!

When my wife was nursing our children , she would frequently switch from.one to the other; some.kids and moms.do that

Dealing with your numbering though: 1. Please provide a Biblical definition that includes it in a breastfeeding context 2. Dealt with in my last post 3. Not a false allegation 4. Women in our criminal.code have an absolute right to expose their breasts (number irrelevant) if for the purpose of...

I refer you to my earlier response that breastfeeding in and of itself is not immodest. I will grant you your.point that IF the mom had both breasts exposed then that was unnecessary (but I'd like to see some evidence as to the practicality of uncovering just the one in the given dress). Beyond...

I'm not sure that this is appropriate venue to publicly confess sins of lust so I'd rather you stopped embarrassing yourself. If you have a problem with this issue, best bring it to the Lord or your pastor, or raise it in the Men's Forum where you can receive prayer.

Quit with the misogynism and ad hominems Right. Now.

Thank you for your edited retraction. I in turn withdraw my allegation. Hopefully now we can move on

Breastfeeding is not and never has been 'public nudity': it is our over-sexualized and worldly western culture that has deemed it so. Sad that some Christians here have fallen for its lies

You mean you can't look away? Wow! And a Reverend too!

I've adduced the evidence which is in front of your very eyes, and your pathetic and egregious ad hominem can't distract from that

I've adduced the evidence which is in front of your very eyes, and your pathetic and egregious ad hominem can't distract from that

You've already taken up the mantra of it being evil so the point is rightly addressed to you: So you've endorsed the 'evil' comment

Then you're still falling into the misogynistic trap of sexualising breastfeeding. Simple response: the mother doesn't need to cover up; you need to look away. If you can't do that then you have a serious problem

Only with the help of the French and Spanish . It's ok, some of your decent sorts stuck with us and helped make Canada!

Except nothing evil was done by this woman....some of the posts on this thread on the other hand...

I am puzzled and dismayed that those who should be and claim to be pro-life* nevertheless are bent on making life yet more difficult for mothers and their children: a mother's lot in life is hard enough as it is without some moralising interfering busybody launching a Crusade Against the...

No you wouldn't because - guess what - It's none of your darn business. Here's a bit of advice that's easy to take: if a breastfeeding mother is putting you off your food/pastor's latest sermon/ your marriage vows (because you're a weirdo)/ your favourite football game, then don't darn well look