Search results

I guess my question is, we all got tired of everything being blamed on Bush. Will we now resort to blaming Obama for the next 4-8 years?

That's a MUCH better counter-argument than I've been seeing. However, the inverse is true as well: by taking a vote away from Trump, one would have to believe she normally votes republican. Most likely. Thank you for the stat, because it also shows that the amount of people who voted for the...

The Constitution Party, who had Castle as their candidate (BW stated she voted for Castle), holds as the first of their seven principles that life from conception is sacred. She voted for a pro-life candidate. Thus, your accusation is false, and you owe her an apology. Of course, you'll come...

Except that from the democratic viewpoint, not voting for Hillary was a vote for Trump. Thus, your statement is wrong.

Voting for a third party means that you took a vote away from BOTH Clinton and Trump. The only reason the democrats (especially Obama) encouraged people to vote 3rd party was because: 1) he was addressing Sanders supporters who stated they would vote for Trump rather than Clinton; 2) the dems...

Please don't presume to speak for the rest of us. The key to Jon's post was his final sentence: "But not Hell as the topic itself."

So I guess we're gonna ignore that the opening post was erroneous?

Actually, I saw a thread a day or two ago where ITL answered your question. So that's one. http://www.baptistboard.com/threads/trump-approval-rating.103640/#post-2290824 I don't "hate" Trump; but I didn't vote for either of them. There were other candidates.

It is?

Over-generalization. Depends on the church.

Whatever word you choose--it's your intention that defines it. It's still obvious that you're being derogatory. So--you still gonna continue the grade school insults? Or will you show some real maturity and stop responding in a way that encourages people to antagonize you?

Believe in? It never crossed my mind--or anyone else's, for that matter-- that you might believe in gremlins. It's been quite obvious that you were using the reference to analogize people to annoying, destructive creatures--thus, making the reference derogatory, and a very good reason why the...

Disagreeing with you, pointing out flaws in thinking, and/or correcting errors is NOT "attacking." Perhaps the way in which it's done can be emotionally hurtful; but when you expose yourself publicly, you must know that in a sinful world, such things are gonna happen. You have two choices...

Maybe they're tired of you using it as derogatory name-calling?

I understood that. My apologies if it seemed directed toward you. I'd have been better if I identified it as "signature line."

Translation: they did it, so it's okay for us to do it.

First you say they're not out there; now you imply they've given up. Shouldn't you identify who's not out there before you judge their lack of commitment? That's what I was hoping you'd say. Of course, it really depends on what they're placing their faith in.

My apologies for not reading through the whole thread. Has someone already pointed out the logical fallacy with the thread title? Namely, for the thread title to be true, and be relevant to "pro-life," that it must be proven that refugees are facing death? If such cannot be proven, then...

Salty's question was valid. How do you know so many people aren't out open-air preaching? Or are you just assuming because they seem to be in disagreement with you? You're aware Doss was a 7th Day Adventist, right?

On the day of Pentecost, the apostles open-air preached; and they saw 3,000 respond to the preaching....