• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. L

    Leftist bias in state university course

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/student-whistleblower-sounds-alarm-on-infuriating-course-bias-at-university-of-illinois/vi-AA1Sq0tZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=69415030f2724cd28a59b3d9cc383c0c&ei=12...
  2. L

    Sprawling Fraud in Minnesota

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/one-chart-lays-bare-the-sprawling-fraud-network-minnesota-officials-missed/ar-AA1Soteo?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=694052f984fe4852af1d896dce72fa05&ei=15...
  3. L

    Is Ussher's Bible Chronology correct?

    Douglas Woodward wrote: "[James] Ussher relied upon the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11, as published a few decades earlier (1611) in the King James Bible" (Rebooting the Bible, Part One, p. 137). Douglas Woodward quoted where Henry B. Smith, Jr., wrote: "Ephraem of Syria [306-373 A. D.] is...
  4. L

    Is the 1611 KJV a hybrid translation?

    KJV defender David Sorenson identified the 1535 Coverdale’s Bible as “a hybrid translation” (Faithful Word, p. 102) [bold type added]. Orlaith O’Sullivan maintained that Coverdale’s “1535 Bible relies heavily on [George] Joye’s earlier translations” of the books of Psalms, “Isaiah, Jeremiah...
  5. L

    Critical warning for KJB believers from Bryan Ross

    KJV defender B=AZX3IczX26Ewem70SmHJ5yRwhnOFFZ58MzdiUJYkryEoeBViEAM3mJnPE1dri4LzQa_WLZkllBqUlCN9py44RK1u4SLXDLlXtL7N4VXbna9-j9aBc2__j5nNGqNIXR6qkaTLCNc67QKsFNNiP_F2Rc8iVwHB97Y4m--wkc_Cv60E4ahxsb4-YOaSU2io5XMAZ7UsC3KAXOrU__CbNngma4-t&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R']ryan Ross wrote: "This is a critical warning...
  6. L

    Do Wikipedia donations go toward paying liberal activists to rewrite articles?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/wikipedia-donations-go-toward-paying-liberal-activists-to-rewrite-articles/ar-AA1QroVA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6917af1128cf4a73a5cded50a4a4a1a8&ei=21...
  7. L

    Is this common sense?

    After quoting John 6:63, Mike Holloway wrote: “The Word of God, the Bible, is alive because God’s Word is also the Holy Spirit” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 122). Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit...
  8. L

    Do some KJV readings agree with Critical Text readings?

    In the following quotations, the Greek words printed in Greek letters have been transliterated to English letters. Concerning the KJV’s rendering “great things” at Luke 1:49, KJV defender Laurence Vance asserted: “The AV reading ultimately goes back to the CT [Critical Text] reading of magna”...
  9. L

    Enduring KJV-only myth regarding the KJV

    KJV-only advocate Matthew Verschuur asserted: “One of the most enduring myths regarding the King James Bible is that the common and standard edition in use in the 20th and 21st centuries is the 1769 Edition” (Vintage Bibles, p. 47). KJV defender Laurence Vance wrote: “There are 750 differences...
  10. L

    Is "tree of life" in some Bibles at Revelation 22:19 a sheer conjecture that doesn't exist?

    Concerning Revelation 22:19 in his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman wrote: “All the new translations say ‘tree of life’ instead of ‘book of life.’ Again, the change is uncalled for, the Receptus reads ‘bibliou.’ “Tree of life’ is sheer conjecture. No alternate reading is given...
  11. L

    Unholy human KJV-only reasoning/teaching

    One sound reason that the modern case for a KJV-only view can be regarded to be flawed and even broken is KJV-only reasoning’s dependence upon use of fallacies. The chain of arguments for a KJV-only view can be no stronger than its weakest links. Some premises that underlie KJV-only conclusions...
Top