Search results

Yes I do. You're a false teacher, a wolf in sheep's clothing telling people that trusting Jesus is not enough, that they have to work for their salvation. You're an enemy of the cross, a reproach to the Gospel and tare among the wheat. You would put people under the condemnation of the law...

Yes, the abolitionists were all Bible believing Christians, and many were Baptists.

I had noticed that FTW was not on for the last week or to. Melchizedec guy sounds a lot like him.

You are not qualified to judge Christians in the US and tell us that you know what they think. You are not qualified to assign motives to anyone. Laziness is a poor life skill. And yes, there are other reasons than laziness, but laziness is a big one. Not managing credit card debt is...

I think if the GOP does get all three, the GoP will work with Trump better than before. Trump no longer has the Mueller investigation hanging over him. Back when there was a question if he would make it, the GoP was hedging their bets, but I have seen several in teh GoP start backing Trump...

When have Christians ever thought or said something like that? Wrong. We want to make it harder for people who are mentally and physically capable of holding down a job, to live off of the backs of hard working people. No one is trying to make it harder to be poor, but there are those who...

Obedience is the fruit of faith/believing. It is not how salvation is procured. Your problem amounts a person having to live as a Christian prior to actually being a Christian in order to be saved. You have a works-based system of righteousness that is condemned by Scripture. If you are...

Being a lousy smart aleck doesn't' help you. You can't produce any verses that that show salvation can lost. Bottom line.

It doesn't at all. You are simply unable to study the Scriptures with any level of skill.

The Bible doesn't contradict itself. It doesn't say that you cannot lose salvation in one place and then say you can lose it in another place. You are pitting the Bible against itself and that demonstrates pure incompetence when it comes to handling the Bible, on your part.

No, not at all.

(satire) Yes, that's because racism is a one-way street and only white people can be racist. It is racist to hate people of any color, except white people. White people are racist on the basis that they were born white. White is a racist color. White bread, white rice, powdered sugar, white...

Not all diseases cause you to waste away. It is not a matter of making fat out of nothing. But there ways for your body to convert things like insulin into fat.

Why can't we claim that they were not saved if they were genuine racists?

Yes, there is a moral distinction. The problem is that some people who perhaps want to deflect from a particular sin, always bring up common excesses and foibles. But there is a difference between being overweight and being a glutton. Over-eating is not "gluttony." Gluttony is the worship...

Insulin is produced due to sugar production in the body and a small amount of food that not necessarily high in calories, but that is high in sugar can produce excess insulin and that insulin is stored as fat. You don't have eat large amounts of food. Not everyone knows they are diabetic...

No one who hates someone of another race is saved. You cannot be an impenitent racist and claim to know Jesus as Savior and Lord.

Not true. Over production of insulin can increase weight dramatically in those with diabetes. And one does not have to eat a lot food for that too happen a handful potato chips or a glass of diet soda can cause that to happen.

I take Scripture literally, which is entirely different than "face value" which is a fleshly and inaccurate method of interpreting Scripture. I am not a bias defender. I am a truth defender and I can spot your lies and deception a mile away. There are no opposing verses. The Bible has one...

No, you simply have nothing in the Bible that says anything like that. You have to twist verses and rip them from their immediate context to make them appear to address something they were not intended to address. Red herring Another red herring. Why are you trying to change the subject?