Search results

Why I, as an Arab Christian, still err on the side of the modern state of Israel 1) Controversial A) Objection: those are not true Jews 2) Supernatural a) In preservation b) In wealth: c) In influence: d) In might B) Objection: Israel is controlled by Satanists...

Furthermore, my distant relative, George Antonius, wrote the seminal book on Arab Nationalism, titled "The Arab Awakening", which is still studied in universities. Here's the documented truth about the history of Israel-Palestine:

Acts 13:48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed. This is a comprehensive study of Acts 13:48 which deals with: 1) the etymology of ordained 2) the uses of the Greek word (and derived...

Are you kidding? Sometimes I don't even agree with myself.

Yes but 8:21 is covenantal, it's simply spelled out to man in chapter 9. And thank you.

Can any covenant between man and God be confirmed (in the sense of ratified) without a blood sacrifice? Many such covenants involve a blood sacrifice (Noah, Abraham, Moses). But no mention of a sacrifice is made regarding the Davidic covenant (2Sa.7/1Ch.17) which is indeed called covenant in...

Your comment implies that all the brethren who saw my question and did not answer are dishonest. Note that at least one of the learned brethren rated the OP as "informative". I am emailing back and forth with an Adventist (hence historicist) scholar, who himself told me it would take more...

Anyone?

I'm not debating here, i'm only looking to correctly represent the point by point interpretations of the schools here below: Thanks

Well ok then.

We did not say it said the blue marine words, whereas Calvinist do say it "says" the black ones. So this is irrelevant.

So you're blowing me off.

Ok, the replies and subpoints are multiplying. If any of you Calvinist brethren are up to it, come on my channel, "Counsel and Might" and we'll hash it out dialogically. You private message me and I'll give you my email to set it up. https://www.youtube.com/c/drGeorgeAntonios

He didn't say anything about salvation.

There is no way to avoid the tension. The system is self-refuting.

Fair enough, and thank you, but for the record, I find you a reasonable man and enjoy engaging with you. If you think that is a problem, then I also think you go too far. Amen, however, There is no such thing in Calvinism when Calvinism is properly understood. All means are insufficient...

Did you listen to it?

Help me out, where? Specifically.

Could you please define "of God" with scriptures?

I would have a problem with that. As written, that is unscriptural. There is no "inward calling of God" as Calvinistically understood. Maybe my study of this will at least help explain why I say this: