Search results

God never stated there was death, before Adam disobeyed. That is you "putting words" in "God's mouth". Death only resulted from one particular sin, and that was Adam's disobedience, and no one else.

Did you mean: "copy and paste" ?

The same can be said about your interpretation of Titus and Vespasian. You all go through hoops to say something different than Gabriel. Gabriel simply gives us the prophecy of Jesus. The same Prince is mentioned in verse 25, 26, and 27.

The wrong literal interpretation is still the wrong literal interpretation. Jesus is both Messiah and Prince. The Jews destroyed their own Temple and city. Last I checked Jesus was a descendant of Judah. Has that changed?

Then the King part will be at the 7th Trumpet. No verse claims God set Jesus up as the earth's King other than Revelation 11:15. You seem to be going out of your way to prove Jesus is not on the earth at the time the 7th Trumpet sounds. According to your logic, Jesus could have been...

Then do you think the Bible should conform to paganism that states death is good, until it is not?

A reign on earth is the only context after a period of tribulation. Are we to assume that John is referring to Christians prior to the birth of Christ, who were beheaded during a never mentined Great Tribulation, and people who never even heard of Christ who was not born yet, will now reign...

This is not mentioned anywhere in the book of Revelation. I smell a con and a human interpretation not found in Scripture, but only in the imagination of men's minds. Who needs Satan to deceive humans, when Christians deceive other Christians and themselves by saying God hath not surely...

There is no verse in Revelation that mentions the Church being caught up into the air, so was Paul wrong about that, since it is not in Revelation? By your literal interpretation method there is no second coming, period. The first coming was Jesus on the earth. Since the second coming would...

So it is OK to disobey God, as long as death is not the enemy? What causes death to be the enemy while people are freely sinning and being disobedient? Paul gave us a reason why there was no death prior to Adam's disobedience: death was the punishment, and always has been for sin. Romans...

Was the Messiah part when Jesus was a toddler? Jesus was also a toddler, one in the same, no? Jesus was on the earth for over 33 years, but never sat on a throne during that time as a Prince. You are the one denying that Jesus will ever physically return to the earth. Jesus was cut off...

So then in the NHNE, death will continue as that is part of any perfect creation? All living things on earth ate from plants and herbs, and yes those grow in the sea, no? Are you adding to Genesis 1 just to make a point, that plankton had to be consumed? The whole point was that what God...

You do realize that Satan cannot be both bound and in a pit for the same thousand years as is claimed these people were not worshipping him, while others were? Satan being bound in a pit was to prevent such worship and deception. Nor has the mark been handed out during your last undefined...

Those beheaded are the only nations. No one was left alive when Satan was bound. You don't even think those on white horses nor Jesus ever made it to the earth. The only being in Revelation 20 mentioned as in heaven was the angel who came down to the earth, and then that angel was on the...

Death as a term began from planting one tree, and a law given to one single individual. Death was not a common term anywhere else in creation. Eve did not know what death meant but was deceived by the serpent to think it was something that would make one wise. Since you are going by the name...

They do now. They did not before Adam disobeyed. There was no death. So explain how any one would know and understand what death was. People today still do not understand what it means to be separated from their spirit, 6,000 years later. Death became part of nature, only after Adam...

Explain from Scripture anything that died prior to Adam's disobedience.

Of course Daniel mentions the Prince to come part on the earth, as much as the Messiah to come part was on the earth. Why would one prophecy be totally different than the other? They are in the very same verse. Both Messiah and Prince to come part take place physically on the earth.

The Messiah came as the Lamb in the first century. The Prince to come happens after Jerusalem was destroyed. The Second Coming has not happened yet. That is when the King sits on the throne in Jerusalem as the prophecied Prince to come.

You have your facts wrong. Jesus was not a descendant of Joseph by birth, but by adoption. God fixed that which man destroyed. "the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end."...