Search results

Everything is fine, Brother. I know it's nothing personal, forum wide. I don't hang around very long on any site, it just doesn't work for me, so I move on. It was a pleasure to meet you, and I wish for all of you Num. 6:24-26, "The Lord bless thee, and keep thee: The Lord make his face...

I'm causing to much controversy and creating to many enemies to remain here. I'll be moving on now and let BB get back to normal operation

I'm afraid you're in over your head here, ky.

Yes, it's an anti-type. Adam is the type of Christ as the counterpart in the fulfillment of Christ (prophecy) coming to undo what Adam did. It's the same as the Blood of animal sacrifice of the OT Law representing the Blood of the offering of Christ. The blood of bulls and goats could not...

How is it that you can't understand, if you disagree with anything I've said, then show me from Scripture where I erred. You've shown me nothing, ky, but what you disagree with. Show me in Scripture your understanding of the type, I've have clearly shown you mine. ONE MAN brought "death" by...

Yep, that seems like a difference of interpretation Now prove me wrong, and we'll be getting somewhere..

I've got some thick skin, but if I'm wrong then prove me wrong! You've proven nothing here but that you disagree. You're going to have to do better than this, ky!

In these parts where I was raised, if you call a man ignorant, you man up with telling him how he was ignorant. If not, then take your part with the women folk.

Well, be fair and show me exactly where my ignorance was placed. I'm a big boy, I can take it! I'm sure we can we can work it out.

There was something else I wanted to point out but the conflict began and I lost track of it. The Scripture tells us who was saved in the Book of Genesis. Abel was accepted by God when he brought an animal sacrifice before the Lord, Cain was not accepted when brought a sacrifice from the...

Is it possible we can actually agree on something? This may be a monumental moment in history.

I've shown you what I've learned and agree with. I'd like to see what you've learned and I'm sure I'll have some comment!

Opinion with no real substance.

Ok, I agree to disagree. Made all my points.

As I've said before, everyone has to study the Scripture to determine doctrine for themselves. Mr. Wuest has only provided what he found and believes, but you are the final judge in your beliefs. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, just giving the explanation of where the sin nature...

Ok, LOL, we will just have to agree to disagree. I've explained by points clearly, so here we have another case of opposite interpretations.

But they never repented, ky. As I said before, instead of owning their sin, Adam blamed Eve, and she blamed the Serpent for their sins. No repentance, no Blood applied. See, your going with Covenant Theology through Calvinism to "election." That's not the way it works, ky.

I don't know if Adam is in hell or not, there is no solid way of knowing. My point from the beginning is that John Gill doesn't know either! But yet he "assumes" they were saved. Just as everyone else, there is no Blood applied without repentance. There is no sign whatsoever in Scripture...

Nope, that is not correct in the case of Adam and Eve. The Blood was only applied by repentance of those sins. They were naked and now needed clothing after the reality of sin. Physically they were clothed with the skins, but spiritually they were not clothed without repentance. There is no...

Adam is a type of Christ! But not in similarity or righteousness. That was my point. The figure/type is this. ONE MAN brought death by sin into the world. Adam ONE MAN brought redemption and life into the world. Jesus Christ. I'm hoping you're picking up what I'm putting down!