Search results

The good thing about BB is that you will hear the truth, you will see some very interesting controversies over Scripture in a wide range. Very good place to learn, to hear the details of any given matter from the understanding of some very smart people on Scripture. I've studied the Scripture...

Just as I had imagined, but maybe worse. Anything concerning Scripture doctrine is taken universally by Wik. Meaning thy consider all beliefs not to exclude any particular belief. They begin with of all things "soul sleep;" If I were you I would stay away from such garbage. You're much...

I'm not accustomed to taking anything from Wik concerning the Scripture. But I will read it if it's not to long.

Well I just learned something! I was not aware of your input on that conversation with Christ and the Sadducees. I've never seen it that way.

Annihilation is not taught in Scripture. In Rev. 20 the souls of those in Hell are called up for judgement and notice their bodies are also called up. They are cast into the Lake of Fire body and soul forever. Those in Hell are still there from 6000 years ago to the present, waiting for this...

It was the Sadducees that denied the resurrection and immortality. The Pharisees believed in the afterlife through the resurrection. As far back as Abraham they believed in a future heavenly home whose builder and maker was God. claiming to be pilgrims on this earth.

The warning for losing our faith and our salvation is given in Heb. 3:14 "For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end;" It's placing the Holy Spirit in an embarrassing/insulted situation.

That person can't be renewed to repentance, they have committed the unforgivable sin, blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit entered into them by faith and the faith is no longer existing, forcing the Holy Spirit to leave, putting Him and Christ to open shame.

Another is Heb. 6:4-9 which is equal to the OT "the righteous turning from his righteousness." It's the denial of faith in Christ that was once present.

That comes from Heb. 10:26-31, and a couple of other places I would have to look up being my memory is not what it should be.

Not all of the Pentecostals deny it. Swaggart is or was, a strong upholder of the KJV and he is scripture only. Some claim he's not but I have watched his show "A study in the Word" for years and have not seen what some claim.

It was at that time of cannon of Scripture being determined that the dark ages began. That was the time in this world when the Word of God was hidden from man by the RCC. But God worked His magic and placed in the heart of our Reformers the way back to Him.

Yes, I agree! One last act of God through the Church before it began its descendance into heresy.

No, the RCC does not have Apostolic Authority, they imagine from Scripture what is not there. You should know by now we are having none of this, Cathode.

Yes, the death of man was inevitable through the fact of sin. But we were condemned to a much worse fate than that. The One who never sinned and God's Law could not take hold of, volunteered to suffer that wrath on our part.

Ok, Brother, I understand your position and I have no problem with it. I would have a problem if this was deemed mandatory knowledge with God. Let me explain, if I can, why I'm PSA. The wrath of God on man for His sin is death, that is exactly what Christ took for us in our place. That...

Where does guilty man condemned to death by the Law of a Holy God find reconciliation in your parables? The wrath of God on man for his sin must be carried out by God's Law. There is no way around it. And who took the place of man?

See what I mean by nothing to be gained? This will continue to the Second Coming and we will still be disagreeing.

What limited atonement view? Where is that in Scripture? That is present only in theory and an interpretation taken to form that theory.

There is no atonement theory that can be absolutely proven from Scripture. I disagree that if PSA is correct then limited atonement has to be correct. Whether the atonement was for only the Elect or for the entirety of humanity the theme of PSA is the same. Christ took the punishment of...