Search results

Nikolas Cruz. The "gun lobby" wasn't the reason Cruz saw several counselors, who each should have reported him, thus adding him to the background check list, which would have prevented him from legally obtaining weapons -- BUT THEY DIDN'T. The "gun lobby" wasn't the reason the FBI were...

Depends on who's writing the history book...one man's coup is another man's revolution....

Okay, I'll bite: what part of the Constitution is Trump being accused of not following, or not expected to follow? What courts is he or will he be ignoring?

What a silly statement/question. Since there's an obvious answer, what's the real point of this thread?

ad hominem much? As has been asked of you before -- what about the last few months, or moments? Doesn't salvation cover all that came before? If YOU don't know about it, does that mean it didn't happen? Or is Hawking's salvation based, in your eyes, on his lifetime of works? Isn't that a...

And it's what you don't know that should give you pause. But don't let that stop you from making declarations about individuals, rather than making scriptural declarations.

PRAYING!!!

The bolded part is the failure of brian's argument. Since he declares "assuming nothing changes," he admits he isn't sure whether Hawking is currently in heaven or hell.

Agreed! And let us not forget - the changes that may have occurred in the last 3 months, the last 3 days, or even the last few minutes or seconds. But it's easier to condemn than to leave it to God.

Good stuff. Thanks for sharing.

Archangel - thank you. There was a lot there to absorb. But some of it is problematic. I make no claim to be anywhere near T.C. Skeat's level, much less the author of the commentary; and I haven't taken the time to look through other commentaries yet. So I only offer this for consideration...

Looking for discussion revolving around 1 Tim 4:10. Particularly looking for the explanation of the Greek tenses, wording, etc.; and the context, in Greek, to help explain this verse. Thanks.

And he keeps digging....

I figured something was up with you, and was getting worried. Hope all is well, or at least better.

Referring to the opening post AGAIN - democrats have found that IT IS followed by 100% of the online sellers they attempted to trap. You've dug yourself a deep hole in this thread, and you just keep digging.

Tom - been trying to catch you. Sent you a PM.

How in the world do you come to that conclusion?!? The article identifies that democrats asked for, and got, a test of the system; and the result was that they found no illicit gun sales. That doesn't mean that it's not happening, but neither does it imply that anyone condones illicit gun...

To go along with the "Democrat Anti-gun Sting Fizzles" thread started a few days ago.... Illinois AG candidate robbed at gunpoint in Chicago during campaign photoshoot A Democratic candidate running for Illinois attorney general was robbed at gunpoint Thursday during a campaign photoshoot in...

Thank you. I know where I was heading with this; but it was incorrect. Yes, I'm fully capable of publicly admitting when I'm wrong. <grin>

My previous question still stands: have I correctly identified your line of reasoning?