Search results

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-has-spent-nearly-40-of-presidency-on-vacation/vi-AA1wzHQm?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=8f52531e430c47f8a5f9649b5255f32e&ei=48

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/left-wing-research-group-blows-warning-whistle-on-democrats-future/ar-AA1wApdW?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=80c6e47e530e41b980723f9d121c3f45&ei=37

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pro-harris-dark-money-group-shoveled-more-than-half-a-million-dollars-to-firms-owned-by-its-founders/ar-AA1wAOOT?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=21591e3ed6564ed2bcb1ad55420e4fec&ei=16

At 1 Thessalonians 4:2c, Tyndale's, Coverdale's, Matthew's, Taverner's, Great, and Whittingham's all have "Lord Jesus Christ" while the KJV has only "Lord Jesus." Do these early Bibles honor Christ more than the KJV here? Does the KJV deny the deity of Christ by removing "Christ" from the "Lord...

Several pre-1611 English Bibles and many post-1611 English Bibles clearly, precisely, and accurately identify Jesus Christ as "our God and Saviour" at 2 Peter 1:1. William Tyndale in 1534, Miles Coverdale in 1535, and John Rogers in 1537 translated the last part of this verse as "righteousness...

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bah-humbug-rand-paul-report-details-waste-in-federal-spending/ar-AA1wtBUO?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=efc7fab2a83b442099eee2a7f8287163&ei=19

In the marginal notes in the 1611 KJV, its translators sometimes gave the more literal meaning of original Hebrew or Greek words, sometimes gave alternative translations, and sometimes even gave variant readings. Laurence Vance cited the report to the Synod of Dort about the translating of the...

Perhaps you dishonor the Lord Jesus Christ when you sometimes jump to wrong conclusions and falsely accuse some other English Bibles of attacking Him when they did not.

www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/kentucky-sen-rand-paul-exposes-1-trillion-in-government-waste-in-annual-festivus-report/ar-AA1wr8yZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=56428d92ddeb487789d24982040aaf5f&ei=125

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-research-shows-the-massive-hole-dems-are-in/ar-AA1wk6Gc?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e7b06eaf4b2d422babac43a3ac1c877c&ei=7

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/prices-rose-over-20-under-joe-biden-s-administration/ar-AA1wjClN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=985c197e0ded4731a76f0f465be09c65&ei=23...

The results of Biden's policies will cause some inflation to continue in 2025. www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/prices-rose-over-20-under-joe-biden-s-administration/ar-AA1wjClN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=985c197e0ded4731a76f0f465be09c65&ei=23

The so-called "pure Cambridge edition" first printed around the 1920's is not a perfect edition of the KJV. This edition is not presently printed by Cambridge University Press. This edition has some inconsistencies and imperfections that other KJV editions had correct. It fails to put some...

It has not been demonstrated that one specific edition of the KJV out of the over 100 to 200 existing, varying KJV editions is a perfect one. There is not one perfect English text of the KJV that has been printed every word the same from 1611 until today.

In his book edited by D. A. Waite, H. D. Williams asserted the following as one of his criteria for translating: “Under no circumstances should a version which is not based upon the Received Texts be used as an example” (Word-for-Word Translating, p. 230). Troy Clark claimed that the...

The 1611 KJV is the third authorized version of the state Church of England.

It is most likely that the KJV translators obtained their knowledge of the Rheims New Testament from a book by William Fulke which compared the Rheims N. T. side by side with the Bishops'. In his introduction to a 1911 facsimile reprint of the 1611, A. W. Pollard maintained that "probably every...

First-hand testimony and evidence from one of the KJV translators would acknowledge or affirm the use of the 1582 Rheims NT in the making of the KJV. Ward Allen observed: "At Col. 2:18, he [KJV translator John Bois] explains that the [KJV] translators were relying up on the example of the...

Are you then suggesting that the KJV corrects the Hebrew OT and the Greek NT or that the KJV is superior to the Hebrew OT and the Greek NT?

According to scriptural truth, adding words or verses would be just as wrong as omitting words or verses. Some may claim that they are simply removing added words or verses. When you allege the omitting of verses, you would have the burden of proof to demonstrate that those verses were...