Separate names with a comma.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Here is what I said about the NIV:Mistranslation in the NIV Note that I presented faults with the NIV, not the LEB. Then note every single...
Was it Van or the NIV that omitted words, added words, and changed the meaning of words in the 27 examples? The NIV needs fixing, not scripture....
In other post you speak of applying the same principals across all translations. The NASB does not agree with you on #6. I don't have a single...
No, Logos, it is what is called a rhetorical question. The idea is translators should not alter the message to fix perceived problems. Their...
The elephant in the room is the claim these NIV mistranslations are somehow needed for functional equivalence, but that is obviously not true. The...
In the above Van has given absolutely no further information in this entire thread beyond his "should read" mantra. Those are 13 verses in which...
The elephant in the room is the claim these mistranslations are somehow needed for functional equivalence, but that is obviously not true. The NIV...
Van has once more come up with his nonsense chart. He's like a Chatty Cathy Doll. He keeps spouting off despite his ridiculous stance. 1 Samuel...
It is instructive how many times Van's favorite versions go against his preferred reading. Mark 1:41 a host of versions, with the lone exceptions...
More personal incredulity, more fallacy, but no assertion that the twenty three verses do not mistranslate the underlying text. The elephant in...
Mistranslation in the NIV 1) Isaiah 12:3 the omission of the conjunction should read, "therefore" 2) Mark 1:41 Jesus was indignant should read,...
