Separate names with a comma.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Later KJV editions in the Scofield Study Bible with an additional 1996 copyright have a Cambridge text instead of the Oxford text. It is likely...
Glenn Conjurske maintained that the work of Benjamin Blayney was “carried out haphazardly and inconsistently” (Bible Version, p. 62). The 1769...
This list omits some major editions of the KJV such as the 1616 London edition, the 1660 London edition, the 1743 Cambridge edition, the 1762...
In some places in the 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV, the apostrophe was not yet introduced, was introduced incorrectly, or was revised in later...
After checking several Oxford editions of the KJV, the change at 1 Samuel 2:13 in Oxford editions would seem to have been made after 1876. 1...
In the last few months, I have obtained copies of several KJV editions printed at Oxford in England. The last one I obtained was printed at the...
At 1 Samuel 2:13, the 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV has this rendering "priest's custom." The 1846 KJV edition published by the American Bible...
Do KJV-only advocates actually have a KJV that is every word the same as the 1769 Oxford edition? Judges 11:7 children of Gilead (1769) elders...
This is interesting....when were these revisions made?
The present Oxford KJV edition in the Scofield Reference Bible is not every word the same in text as the 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV. The 1769...
The 1611 has "priests custom." I don't think that any apostrophes were used in the 1611 edition. I think that Paris in the 1762 Cambridge...
Sorry, I meant the 1611 rendering of 1 Samuel 2:13.
