Separate names with a comma.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Thanks for all the information, but it's a little complicated for my simple timeline. :) I'll see what I can incorporate.
While KJV-only advocates claim to be using the 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV, I do not know of any one of them that actually uses it. They claim...
The word of the LORD is a person. I have shown you this before. The first mention of him by this title and he is visible. It is very early in the...
Do you in effect suggest that all those many Oxford and Cambridge editions of the KJV that followed the new Oxford error introduced in the 1769...
And this just adds to what I had posted. The KJV has been altered by men but it still retains the intent of God. Just as the NASB, NKJV, BSB, NET...
Some post-1900 KJV editions were based on the 1873 Cambridge edition of Scrivener instead of on the 1769. There are also the 2005 and 2011...
The 1769 Oxford edition was reported to have over 100 errors in it. The 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV is not the one popularly in print today....
You do not prove your opinion to be true. Your opinion can be wrong. There are many varying editions of the KJV so that all of them cannot...
The actual error introduced in the text of the KJV by the 1769 Oxford edition was at Exodus 6:21, and this error seems to have remained in Oxford...
In the last few months, I have obtained copies of several KJV editions printed at Oxford in England. The last one I obtained was printed at the...
