1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search Results for Query: "Luke 9:3"

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 9, 3
Search Again
Page 1 of 2
  1. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    Only Mark 6:8 does. If either Matthew 10:10 or Luke 9:3 are read staff in the singular a contradiction is made against the instruction as reported...
    Post by: 37818, Mar 25, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  2. Van
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    LOL, now the TR says in Mark 6:8, take a staff, and in Luke 9:3 do not take staffs, and in Matthew 10:10 do not take a staff. And that the WEB...
    Post by: Van, Mar 25, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  3. Van
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    The MT in Matthew 10:10 and Luke 9:3 do not specify any staff is allowed.
    Post by: Van, Mar 25, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  4. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    @Van We have an ongoing disagreement over Mark 6:8, Matthew 10:10 and Luke,9:3
    Post by: 37818, Mar 24, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  5. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    The CT in Matthew 10;10 and Luke 9:3 do not specify "extra" staff. Nor the TR in Matthew 10:10.
    Post by: 37818, Mar 24, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  6. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    Again, no.
    Post by: 37818, Mar 24, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  7. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    No. Also the KJV does not follow TR in Matthew 10:10. The TR being singlular and the KJV plural.
    Post by: 37818, Mar 24, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  8. Van
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    The TR contradiction as presented in the KJV. Mark 6:8 take a staff (S), Luke 9:3 do not take staffs, Matthew 10:10 do not take staffs. The CT...
    Post by: Van, Mar 24, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  9. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    The CT contradiction to allow a staff, Mark 6:8 and not to allow a staff Matthew 10:10, Luke 9:3.
    Post by: 37818, Mar 24, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  10. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    You fail to hear the contradiction of the CT translation.
    Post by: 37818, Mar 23, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  11. Van
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    Yes, the Modern Literal Version (MLV) and the English Majority Text Version (EMTV) both has staff in the plural at Matthew 10:10. And both have...
    Post by: Van, Mar 23, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  12. Van
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    The CT is singular. The MT, based on the WEB has singular. Since the KJV is plural, I do not think the TR is singular.
    Post by: Van, Mar 23, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  13. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    My electronic TR is singular. But has in parentheses Scrivener [1894] TR as plural. The KJV follows what became Scrivener's. There is not one...
    Post by: 37818, Mar 22, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  14. Van
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    Am I aware that the CT may be in error and either or both the TR and MT might on occasion be correct? Yes.
    Post by: Van, Mar 21, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  15. 37818
    Post

    Biblical errancy?

    Are you aware that the CT often caused Biblical difficulties against inerrancy? For example. Jesus' instructions told His disciples to take a...
    Post by: 37818, Mar 20, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  16. The Biblicist
    Post

    Staff or no staff?

    You might take a look at this website: http://christianthinktank.com/nostaff.html The essence here is to take what you have, most presumably had...
    Post by: The Biblicist, Nov 13, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  17. Baptist Believer
    Post

    Staff or no staff?

    Yes. We had a tentative discussion of this question yesterday morning and the class wants to talk more about issues with "contradictions" and...
    Post by: Baptist Believer, Oct 31, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  18. Van
    Post

    Staff or no staff?

    Several efforts to harmonize Mark 6:8 ( take a staff) with Matthew 10:9-10 and Luke 9:3 (take not a staff or staves) have been made. Take no...
    Post by: Van, Oct 31, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  19. Baptist Believer
    Post

    Staff or no staff?

    I'm teaching on Luke 9 tomorrow morning and I've been thinking about the differences between the three passages where Jesus gives instructions to...
    Post by: Baptist Believer, Oct 29, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  20. Bro. Ruben
    Post

    With or without staffs?

    Got tired of me? Please don’t. When Jesus sent out the twelve apostles, did He instruct them to take staffs or not? Provide neither gold nor...
    Post by: Bro. Ruben, Nov 26, 2005 in forum: General Baptist Discussions
Showing results 1 to 20 of 22 Next >
Search Again
Page 1 of 2