2001 Translation is evil

[KJB1611reader]

Hello,

The 2001 translation is attacking the divinity of Christ by using the Greek by changing John 1:1 and Acts 20:28.

Many other issues as well.

Shawn

 

[Deacon]

You identify two verses out of the more than 30,000 verses in the Modern KJV and say that makes it is an "evil" version?
“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s version, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own version?” [Matthew 7:3-5, AV 1873 (modified)]

Shawn, I suggest you re-read the rules of this forum.

#3. Do not start a thread with an attack or a flame as your premise. This is in violation of BB rules.

#9. Certain terms are off limits in this forum.
For example:

1. The KJVO crowd will not not refer to the Modern Versions as "perversions," "satanic," "devil's bibles," etc...nor call those that use them "Bible correctors," "Bible doubters," etc.
2. The MV crowd will not refer to the KJVOs as "cults," "heretics," "sacrilegious," etc...nor refer to the KJV in derisive terms such as "King Jimmy's Bible," "Pickled Preserved Version," etc.

Rob

 

[KJB1611reader]

You identify two verses out of the more than 30,000 verses in the Modern KJV and say that makes it is an "evil" version?
“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s version, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own version?” [Matthew 7:3-5, AV 1873 (modified)]

Shawn, I suggest you re-read the rules of this forum.

#3. Do not start a thread with an attack or a flame as your premise. This is in violation of BB rules.

#9. Certain terms are off limits in this forum.
For example:

1. The KJVO crowd will not not refer to the Modern Versions as "perversions," "satanic," "devil's bibles," etc...nor call those that use them "Bible correctors," "Bible doubters," etc.
2. The MV crowd will not refer to the KJVOs as "cults," "heretics," "sacrilegious," etc...nor refer to the KJV in derisive terms such as "King Jimmy's Bible," "Pickled Preserved Version," etc.

Rob

I wasn't referring to the nkjv.

There is translation called the 2001 translation.

Shawn

 

[KJB1611reader]

You identify two verses out of the more than 30,000 verses in the Modern KJV and say that makes it is an "evil" version?
“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s version, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own version?” [Matthew 7:3-5, AV 1873 (modified)]

Shawn, I suggest you re-read the rules of this forum.

#3. Do not start a thread with an attack or a flame as your premise. This is in violation of BB rules.

#9. Certain terms are off limits in this forum.
For example:

1. The KJVO crowd will not not refer to the Modern Versions as "perversions," "satanic," "devil's bibles," etc...nor call those that use them "Bible correctors," "Bible doubters," etc.
2. The MV crowd will not refer to the KJVOs as "cults," "heretics," "sacrilegious," etc...nor refer to the KJV in derisive terms such as "King Jimmy's Bible," "Pickled Preserved Version," etc.

Rob

Evil can mean simply something unpleasing or bad.

 

[Aaron]

Evil can mean simply something unpleasing or bad.

"Evil" isn't on the list, fortunately. There are some unrighteous MVs out there for sure. This is not to be interpreted to mean that I align with the unorthodox sectarian wrestings of KJOism.

 

[KJB1611reader]

Can we go back to discuss 2001 translation?

The choices they used is about same as the nwt.