The resurrection of the dead is one of the principle doctrines of Christianity — in particular the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ from the grave. Infidels and modernists seeking to refute Christianity have fabricated numerous stories in the attempt to explain away the empty tomb and deny the resurrection of Christ. Many of the attempts are unbelievable and would be humorous if not dealing with so serious a subject. Their ludicrous concoctions take more faith than simply believing that a miraculous event took place. The empty tomb cannot satisfactorily be explained except on the basis of a resurrection.
THE DISCIPLES STOLE THE BODY
This is the oldest explanation, invented by the priests and elders. The appearance of alternate explanations is sufficient proof that it was never quite satisfactory.The disciples were not the sort of people who would do such a thing. It would have been a deliberate fraud on their part and cannot be reconciled to their character, doctrine, and behavior in later life. It unreasonable to suppose that not one of them, even under torture and threat of death, ever admitted to any deception.
The account of the soldiers is contradictory. Can we believe that all of the professional guards sent to secure the tomb would be asleep at one time? And if they were asleep, how would they know what happened to the body?! The story actually incriminated the soldiers, and if it had been true, the priests would have been the first to seek their punishment!
The condition of the grave-clothes testify against this theory. If the disciples had stolen the body, they would have not taken the time to unwrap Jesus and leave them. They would have been in a hurry — they would have just snatched the body, grave-clothes and all. It is not probable that a cowardly group of men who fled the crucifixion would have come back to steal a body. And if they did, why was not a diligent search made of their houses? Those who want to believe a lie don’t mind believing a poor one. This story would not hold up in the first century, and will not hold up today.
JEWISH OR ROMAN AUTHORITIES REMOVED THE BODY
At first glimpse this might sound like a possible explanation. It will not withstand close scrutiny. Why on earth they would want to move the body? What possible motive could they have had? None whatsoever! But if they did remove the body, why did they not say so? They could have stopped the preaching of the resurrection (which they so despised) by the simple revelation of the fact that they moved Jesus’ body. They could have called for witnesses — those whose task it was to remove the body. If necessary they could have produced the mouldering remains. They did not because they could not!
THE WOMEN WENT TO THE WRONG TOMB
Others try to explain away this as a mistake. After going to another tomb — an empty tomb — the terrified women ran away. Later the decided that a young man they saw there was an angel announcing that Jesus had risen from the dead. This clever story omits the fact that the young man was an angel, and the phrase “He is risen” from his statement to the women. They also ‘forget’ that the young man tells them to meet Jesus in Galilee. If this could be true, why did the disciples not double-check the facts presented by the women to see whether or not it was so? If the women had merely went to the wrong tomb, the priests could have pointed out the true tomb and completely silenced forever the preaching of the resurrection.
HE WAS NOT DEAD
This theory asserts that Jesus did not really die, but only swooned from exhaustion from the pain and the loss of blood. When placed in the cool tomb, he revived and went out and shewed himself to his disciples and they ignorantly believed he had risen from the grave.
The fact that no such story was ever conceived till near the end of the 18th Century should be enough to expose it as phony. But let us go further. Romans, Jews, and his disciples were ALL convinced that he was dead. The soldiers were experts at execution and the priests were obsessed with killing him — it is inconceivable that they would be so careless. Besides, would three days in a cold, stuffy tomb without food, water, or medical attention tend to revive a man who had been through the cruelties that Jesus had gone through? NO! It would have blown out any flickering life that might be left. But, even if he had revived, could he have freed himself from the grave clothes that bound him? Lazarus had to be loosed. Could he in this weak condition have rolled away a stone that three women would not attempt; then frightened the Roman guards and walked miles to Galilee on pierced feet?? And finally, CHRIST WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PARTY TO SUCH A DECEPTION!
It is clear that these theories are unacceptable when exposed to common sense. Only those deliberately set on denying the resurrection at any cost would be so foolish to espouse any one of these ideas. The Bible in its purity and simplicity is always easier to believe than such strained tales as these!
THE DISCIPLES STOLE THE BODY
This is the oldest explanation, invented by the priests and elders. The appearance of alternate explanations is sufficient proof that it was never quite satisfactory.The disciples were not the sort of people who would do such a thing. It would have been a deliberate fraud on their part and cannot be reconciled to their character, doctrine, and behavior in later life. It unreasonable to suppose that not one of them, even under torture and threat of death, ever admitted to any deception.
The account of the soldiers is contradictory. Can we believe that all of the professional guards sent to secure the tomb would be asleep at one time? And if they were asleep, how would they know what happened to the body?! The story actually incriminated the soldiers, and if it had been true, the priests would have been the first to seek their punishment!
The condition of the grave-clothes testify against this theory. If the disciples had stolen the body, they would have not taken the time to unwrap Jesus and leave them. They would have been in a hurry — they would have just snatched the body, grave-clothes and all. It is not probable that a cowardly group of men who fled the crucifixion would have come back to steal a body. And if they did, why was not a diligent search made of their houses? Those who want to believe a lie don’t mind believing a poor one. This story would not hold up in the first century, and will not hold up today.
JEWISH OR ROMAN AUTHORITIES REMOVED THE BODY
At first glimpse this might sound like a possible explanation. It will not withstand close scrutiny. Why on earth they would want to move the body? What possible motive could they have had? None whatsoever! But if they did remove the body, why did they not say so? They could have stopped the preaching of the resurrection (which they so despised) by the simple revelation of the fact that they moved Jesus’ body. They could have called for witnesses — those whose task it was to remove the body. If necessary they could have produced the mouldering remains. They did not because they could not!
THE WOMEN WENT TO THE WRONG TOMB
Others try to explain away this as a mistake. After going to another tomb — an empty tomb — the terrified women ran away. Later the decided that a young man they saw there was an angel announcing that Jesus had risen from the dead. This clever story omits the fact that the young man was an angel, and the phrase “He is risen” from his statement to the women. They also ‘forget’ that the young man tells them to meet Jesus in Galilee. If this could be true, why did the disciples not double-check the facts presented by the women to see whether or not it was so? If the women had merely went to the wrong tomb, the priests could have pointed out the true tomb and completely silenced forever the preaching of the resurrection.
HE WAS NOT DEAD
This theory asserts that Jesus did not really die, but only swooned from exhaustion from the pain and the loss of blood. When placed in the cool tomb, he revived and went out and shewed himself to his disciples and they ignorantly believed he had risen from the grave.
The fact that no such story was ever conceived till near the end of the 18th Century should be enough to expose it as phony. But let us go further. Romans, Jews, and his disciples were ALL convinced that he was dead. The soldiers were experts at execution and the priests were obsessed with killing him — it is inconceivable that they would be so careless. Besides, would three days in a cold, stuffy tomb without food, water, or medical attention tend to revive a man who had been through the cruelties that Jesus had gone through? NO! It would have blown out any flickering life that might be left. But, even if he had revived, could he have freed himself from the grave clothes that bound him? Lazarus had to be loosed. Could he in this weak condition have rolled away a stone that three women would not attempt; then frightened the Roman guards and walked miles to Galilee on pierced feet?? And finally, CHRIST WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PARTY TO SUCH A DECEPTION!
It is clear that these theories are unacceptable when exposed to common sense. Only those deliberately set on denying the resurrection at any cost would be so foolish to espouse any one of these ideas. The Bible in its purity and simplicity is always easier to believe than such strained tales as these!
Last edited: