• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

About Trump Jr.

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
So it ain't been brought up. But it sure did not look good for him when this Russian meeting came out. Now it turns out Obama's justice department let the main character in without a visa. Now Trump Jr. is still not looking good for going to this meeting, but now it looks even worse for the democrats involved.

Exclusive: DOJ let Russian lawyer into US before she met with Trump team


It appears the democrats were FOR the Russian collusion before they were against it ?
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So it ain't been brought up.

That's because Crabtownboy is on vacation.

But it sure did not look good for him when this Russian meeting came out.

No, it doesn't. I just can't get worked up over it, though. He's an idiot. Have the source give you some tidbit of the information she allegedly has before you take a meeting. Send an intermediate. DON'T bring the campaign chairman. Sheesh!

Get them away from real estate and the Trump's don't know what they are doing.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
But yeah, Trump Jr. appears extremely naieve and petty, here. And the democrats look sneaky, conniving, and hypocritical.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So it ain't been brought up. But it sure did not look good for him when this Russian meeting came out. Now it turns out Obama's justice department let the main character in without a visa. Now Trump Jr. is still not looking good for going to this meeting, but now it looks even worse for the democrats involved.

Exclusive: DOJ let Russian lawyer into US before she met with Trump team


It appears the democrats were FOR the Russian collusion before they were against it ?
A liberal, Democrat, Harvard law professor was on talk radio yesterday and said that Trump Jr violated no laws. He said you can't make what he did for any enforceable federal code.
 

Deacon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So the unsaid question is...

Was this little episode a set-up by the previous administration so they could "wire-tap" and unmask Trump officials to get the inside scoop on his election strategy?​

Rob
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A liberal, Democrat, Harvard law professor was on talk radio yesterday and said that Trump Jr violated no laws. He said you can't make what he did for any enforceable federal code.

True. It's not against the law to take a meeting!

But....Manafort was the campaign chair at the time. He should have reported this woman to the FBI. I'm not saying failure to report her to the FBI is a crime, not sure one way or the other, but it would have been the smart thing to do.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So it ain't been brought up. But it sure did not look good for him when this Russian meeting came out. Now it turns out Obama's justice department let the main character in without a visa. Now Trump Jr. is still not looking good for going to this meeting, but now it looks even worse for the democrats involved.

Exclusive: DOJ let Russian lawyer into US before she met with Trump team


It appears the democrats were FOR the Russian collusion before they were against it ?

The whole meeting is a big nothing burger, It has no meaning or value and says nothing about the people involved.
 

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It may well be a sawdust burger. It sure seems to show a lot of the amorality of our politic system, including the body politic.

Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Bro. James
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
True. It's not against the law to take a meeting!

But....Manafort was the campaign chair at the time. He should have reported this woman to the FBI. I'm not saying failure to report her to the FBI is a crime, not sure one way or the other, but it would have been the smart thing to do.
As the professor said "they have about as much legal grounds to charge Trump Jr. With a campaign or national security crime as they have to charge him with violating the endangered species act."(from memory)
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So the unsaid question is...

Was this little episode a set-up by the previous administration so they could "wire-tap" and unmask Trump officials to get the inside scoop on his election strategy?​

Rob
Yes, one might even surmise that it was a setup from the getgo to entrap Trump Jr into a "dangerous conversation with a suspect Russian".

Backfired!

Like I said - an Italian opera.

Or better yet an American reality show - WHO DO YOU BELIEVE!?

Strictly AN OPINION.
 

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What happens if a high official loses his/her security clearance?

Maybe we need to make sure everyone knows what high crimes and misdemeanors might mean.

Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Bro. James
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What happens if a high official loses his/her security clearance?

Maybe we need to make sure everyone knows what high crimes and misdemeanors might mean.

Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Bro. James


And that everyone knows what presumption of innocence means as well.

HankD
 

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What ever happened to: "abstain from all appearance of evil?"

Inveterate lying and innocence seem to be oxymoronic.

This is not about due process.

Even so, come, Lord Jesus

Bro. James
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
Maybe we need to make sure everyone knows what high crimes and misdemeanors might mean.
Exactly! The radical left, suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome, keep getting the message that NO LAWS WERE BROKEN. So what do they do? They say WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF WHY NO LAWS WERE BROKEN!

It used to irritate me when people would say "Liberalism is a mental illness." I would see that and think, no, it is just a difference of political opinion.

But now I am beginning to think maybe those people were right. Liberalism may well be a mental illness, or at least trigger a psychotic break from reality.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But now I am beginning to think maybe those people were right. Liberalism may well be a mental illness, or at least trigger a psychotic break from reality.

GW Bush's election peeled back the curtain.

We got the whole act with the election of Trump.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Watched Tucker Carlson this evening.

He had a (D) senator (Maybe congressman) on to discuss Trump Jr.

The meeting crashed and burned as the official continuously shouted over Tuckers questions.

It was chaos, almost to the point of psychosis (at least hysteria) on the part of the (D) official - scary.

I really believe now that the DNC is into a power dive crash as their actions and hysterical statements and accusations about President Trump and those close to him that they are so out of control it is becoming more and more evident to everyone that they are in a collective psychotic episode.

Even CNN knows:

CNN legal analyst: 'Absurd' to say Trump Jr.'s Russian lawyer meeting 'treason'

My statements are the opinions of a non-medical individual.

HankD
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
GW Bush's election peeled back the curtain.

We got the whole act with the election of Trump.
Trump is not the problem. His exposure of the Rinos desire to talk and never act is the problem. (I consider it a blessing)
 
Top