Brother Bob said:
grahame;
I went to bed and go back up. It seems to me you are a honest man, but that you yourself are still wrestling with this issue. If you answer me the one question I ask, then I may know for sure about you. Do you believe a man can go to Heaven, if he dies in the act of adultery?
Bob, my dear brother in Christ. No no, you still do not understand what I am saying, even when I have said it so clearly. I am not advocating that we sin, or that we will have churches full of adulterous people. For they who do such things shall indeed not inherit the kingdon of heaven. Please hold that thought in your mind, so you know what I have said concerning sin.
In fact let me emphasise it in another way. I feel that in some quarters the old gospel just isn't being preached. Nowadays you seem to get a lot of folk preaching and saying things like, "come to Christ as you are". He'll accept you with all your sins" etc. In other words they preach a kind of gospel which gives the impression that it doesn't matter what you do in life, all you need to do is come to Christ.
Now I think that you will agree with me that, that is not the gospel. Well, what is the gospel that we should be preaching? Jesus tells us at the very beginning of his ministry, doesn't he? (Matthew 4:17
From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
and again in (Mark 1:14-15)
Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel
Now that is what we are to be doing when we preach the gospel and I'm sure that we are in agreement there. I will go further and say that, that should characterise the life of every Christian in the world, Repentance and faith.
That should be the constant walk of every Christian.
Also I would stick my neck out here and suggest that, that is what everyone else on this thread is saying as far as I can see. Now as I was running my wife to her part time job (She's retired and I'm just coming up to retirement) I was thinking over what you have been saying and I've come to the conclusion that we are both looking at the same thing, but from different angles. Which is logical if we have both believed the gospel from the heart. And this is what I think is happening here. Only I don't think either of us can see what the other is actually saying.
Think of it in this way. Two men are holding up a large diamond which has been cut with many facets. They are both admiring the way this diamond and its beauty. Then one of then says, "Wow! just look at the blue effect when the light shines on it. But the other man, who is looking at it from another direction says, "No, it isn't blue it definitely has a pinkinsh tinge to it". Can you see what I am saying Bob? This glorious gospel of our blessed God is like that diamond. It has many facets. Different sides to it. In this case we are both looking at different sides of the same thing. (please remember not to stretch my illustration too far though)
On the one side there is the Godward angle and on the other side is our part. On the Godward side we read about what He has done. On our side is what we must do. Now I am used to looking at these things systematically and most Calvinists do look at things like that. Now that is how I am approaching Paul's epistle to the Romans, quite simply because that is the way the apostle himself has written it.
What he has done and it is a common method that he used, was to work out the gospel by showing what God has done for us through the Lord Jesus Christ. Then, when he has worked all that out systematically, he then proceeds to apply his message to his readers. And that is exactly what he is doing in his letter to the Roman Christians.
Now that is how I am looking at it. Whereas you have concentrated mainly on our obligations in the light of what God has done. Most of the New Testament writers concentrate on the practical aspect of Christian living, which is what you are rightly doing. This was also the way of the early Christian fathers and it is perfectly right and correct.
But what Paul the apostle was doing was demonstrating how God worked out our salvation through His only Son Jesus Christ. He was in fact answering that question asked by Job of old,
but how should man be just with God
(Job 9:2) This is what Paul the apostle says in chapter 3 of Romans and he spends most of his time reasoning this out and building upon it. Listen to him here
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
Can you see what I am saying Bob, dear friend in Christ?
The apostle doesn't rush into a practical application of the gospel immediately. But rather works it all out and shows his readers how God did it. How God could forgive our sins and
still remain righteous. This you already know Bob, I'm sure of it. The apostle goes even further still and shows just how God can forgive all those sins way back in the past. Those sins that were committed back in Old Testament times. You get this argument in chapter 3 and verse 25
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God
And he gives a couple of examples of OT saints, Abraham (who was before the Law by the way) and David. He is saying in effect that they were saved in exactly the same way as we are, except whilst we look back to what Christ has done on the cross, they looked forward to him through figures and shadows. The writer to the Hebrews devotes most of his epistle to this wonderful truth.
But Paul does not stop there, but goes on to show our sonship by adoption and our final perseverance and glorification. I could go on, but that is not why I'm posting. What I would say though is that we are both approaching the subject in different ways. To be sure no one will enter heaven whose life is characterised by unrepentant sin. For that is a contradiction of the gospel which declares that everyone who names the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
But, and this is crucial to you understanding of what I am saying (which by the way is exactly what you yourself are saying, only you don't know it), What I am saying and what the apostle is saying in chapter six is that those who have truly been justified by faith
will strive to be holy NOT because he is guided by the law in a slavish vain way, thinking that the law will in any way save him. But
because he has new life in Christ and new strength, because he now has the Holy Spirit indwelling him. Now, do you understand what I am saying Bob? In other words, our strength lies not in the keeping of the law. But through the indwelling power of God the Holy Spirit.
Furthermore, Because we are justified by faith, this does not mean that we are perfect. But nevertheless we grow daily in Christ as we walk with him. For
if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
Or a more correct rendering of that word is "every" "cleanseth us from
every sin. Now that is the
practical outworking of justification by faith alone. That is the Reformed doctrine taught by the reformers and I believe that it is the correct approach to the gospel. The enmity has now gone because of Christ's death upon the cross. This cleansing is a daily cleansing of God's children. As Jesus said,
Jesus saith to him, He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit.
(John 13:10) In other words we don't need to be saved from the wrath of God every day. That has been accomplished by Christ on the Cross. But this is a daily cleansing, a sanctification, of God making us holy by our constant repentance and faith in Christ.
This reminds me of an illustration given by C. H. Spurgeon. I can't remember the details, it was so long ago. But apparently at a certain Baptist convention there was this man who was teaching the absolute perfection of the saints. Spurgeon could not convince him of his error. Then one morning as he came down for breakfast he saw this man sitying at the table. Spurgeon picked up the coffee pot and poured it over the head of this man. Spurgeon is supposed to have remarked that he was soon convinced that this man's teaching of absolute perfection was not true in his case at least.:laugh: