Featured After the LIVE hearings (Trump) . . . questions????

Unfortunately it does look like the president did peg military aid on helping him domestically in an election by investigating the Biden's.

I think we now have to shift to whether this is impeachable in our conversation instead of whether there was misconduct.

 

First, second, third degree hearsay. No direct evidence whatsoever.

ANOTHER COLOSSAL DIVERSION, A SMOKESCREEN..

 

FROM ALL INDICATIONS we will hear once or twice that Trump will be going down for the count but Alas HE GETS UP ONE MORE TIME (AT LEAST).

There is also a "whistle blower" and yet we haven't heard the "tweets" although we have a promise.

But GUESS WHAT? (as Juan Williams asks) he will have twirled his/her hearsay GOSSIP
for the Last time.

GOSSIPGATE will be the DNC's legacy of shame left behind as pooper-skooper material on the floors of the House on the HILL.

but not to fear we have a winter, spring and summer to fabricate something better.

 

Naa there is no evidence

 

That is true in the sense that the president is poorly linked to all this directly except by the phone call transcript. But Sondland or Mulvaney or Giuliani are pegged IMO.

 

THEY DEMOCRATS will be happy and acclaim themselves successful if they by popular vote "impeach" the POTUS though they know the senate will bounce it.

ONE MINOR VICTORY.

 

How does it appear he did that?

 

Yep. Hearsay is not admissable as evidence. We have laws that givern rules of evidence. NONE of the "evidence" offered was admissable.

 

I guess it is mostly hearsay. The president is poorly linked to all this directly except by the phone call transcript. But Sondland or Giuliani or possibly Mulvaney are pegged IMO. They seem to be in real trouble, but that is not impeachment.

 

IMHO A man is innocent until proven guilty and the communist or democrats have not done this. I say communist or democrats because I'm not sure just what they are.
MB

 

Nyah. You didn’t just leap to a conclusion but well beyond. First, the dictatorial partisan spectacle; then “witnesses,” “testimony,” and “evidence;” and then possible conclusions. Honest thinking folk will have a hard time getting beyond that first step.

 

I've not paid close attention to this, the Democrat's use of our tax dollars to muckrake and sabotage Trump's re-election, while stalling the progress of government to do so. But, scanning the headlines in the anti-Trump media (CNN, USAToday, etc.) not a single headline shouts that they've found anyone with knowledge that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. And, shout they would.

The Democrat agenda is to turn America into a third-world country ruled by corrupt politicians.

 

All hearsay.

 

Hearsay, mind reading, assumption, conjecture, ignorance, opinion, and irrelevance with an air of condescension and prejudice.

 

The democrats know but don't care - they intend on voting on hearsay as if it were firsthand witness.

 

And with a straight face, he said......Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’