poncho
Well-Known Member
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yet again ...
Yes, Sarin gas is made (partially) from sodium flouride, as well as from potassium flouride. Not, however, in a strength anywhere near great enough to be processed into Sarin. Where, might you ask, is sodium flouride sold at Wal-Mart? Why, in the pharmacy. It is a mouthwash.
Your "source" is a joke. The chemicals have to be processed and combined into the complex chemical (CH3)2CHO]CH3P(O)F to become Sarin, and they have to be in something like 400 times the concentration of a mouthwash.
When are you gonna learn, Poncho? Conspiracy theorists are never right.
"In the last 24 hours, we have learned through samples that were provided to the United States that have now been tested from first responders in east Damascus and hair samples and blood samples have tested positive for signatures of sarin." Kerry said this on NBC's Meet The Press.
Typically, this analysis is conducted with ICP-MS instrumentation, using a plasma torch that disintegrates all organic molecules, leaving only the resulting elements (fluorine). Tests done on Syrian citizens using ICP-MS would not be able to distinguish between sodium fluoride and sarin exposure in terms of the detection of elemental fluorine.
Read that again, because it's crucial to understanding the hoax being perpetrated by the White House: Tests on hair or other tissues, if done using ICP-MS (the most common elemental analysis technology used today), would not be able to distinguish between sodium fluoride and sarin.
Nerve gas effects on a small scale: spray a viable wasp nest with over the counter insecticide for flying insects. Observe their reaction to the nerve agent.
There is some interesting relationships between agents in "Roundup" and "Agent Orange".
The doses are so small they must be safe. Are you sure?
The history of the company called Bayer is interesting.
There is a conspiracy: Satan and his minions and God.
Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
Bro. James
Yet again ...
.................................
Your "source" is a joke. The chemicals have to be processed and combined into the complex chemical (CH3)2CHO]CH3P(O)F to become Sarin, and they have to be in something like 400 times the concentration of a mouthwash.
I don't know what to believe anymore TND just when I got you figured for an ultra conservative you start siding with John Kerry and dumping on Rush Limbaugh.
I'm having trouble comprehending it. It doesn't compute.
That would be a viable comment if not for the lack of concentration of the chemical in the mouthwash. So it's still hogwash.Looks like your science lesson is worthless in this instance.
Yet again ...
Yes, Sarin gas is made (partially) from sodium flouride, as well as from potassium flouride. Not, however, in a strength anywhere near great enough to be processed into Sarin. Where, might you ask, is sodium flouride sold at Wal-Mart? Why, in the pharmacy. It is a mouthwash.
Your "source" is a joke. The chemicals have to be processed and combined into the complex chemical (CH3)2CHO]CH3P(O)F to become Sarin, and they have to be in something like 400 times the concentration of a mouthwash.
are you gonna learn, Poncho? Conspiracy theorists are never right.
Actually, it is totally correct, and no amount of denial will make it any less correct.That is not correct.
Since when is this thread about Republicans and Democrats?It is posters like you who give credit to the false gap between Democrats and Republicans ...
If you believe there isn't, you really aren't in touch with reality.You are one of those ones who actually believe there was a gap between Romney and Obama, and McCain and Obama.
Guess again, genius. He forced the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to adopt language that the Great Pretender will actually oppose.I notice one of your heroes, McCain, just voted to authorize for with Obama. You should be proud.
Actually, it is totally correct, and no amount of denial will make it any less correct.
Since when is this thread about Republicans and Democrats?
If you believe there isn't, you really aren't in touch with reality.
Guess again, genius. He forced the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to adopt language that the Great Pretender will actually oppose.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/04/mccain-opposes-syria-strike-resolution/
The vote came after Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., raised objections to an earlier draft. The objections forced lawmakers to renegotiate the measure; McCain ultimately won tougher language clarifying that U.S. action would be aimed in part at changing the momentum on the ground. He was among the 10 who voted for the final resolution.
The only one around here who "has it bad" are the ones who thinks mouthwash purchased at Wal-Mart can be used to make Sarin gas.You have it bad.
The only one around here who "has it bad" are the ones who thinks mouthwash purchased at Wal-Mart can be used to make Sarin gas.
Then why are you on this thread? Your participation is beginning to look like a deliberate effort to stalk, confuse, obfuscate and deny. Done here.What are you on? I said nothing about Walmart and Sarin gas.
The only one around here who "has it bad" are the ones who thinks mouthwash purchased at Wal-Mart can be used to make Sarin gas.
This is confusion on the part of you and others who believe this does anything to promote al-Qaeda or assist them in their efforts to spread Islamic terror. The fact that al-Qaeda is in Syria fomenting revolution and working to overthrow the Assad government, and the fact that we are considering action against the same government for using chemical weapons on their own people, are two separate story lines. Bombing Syria in an effort to hasten the fall of the Assad regime may put us on the same side with al-Qaeda temporarily, but it does nothing to promote al-Qaeda's agenda.I only served three years in the army but I still remember taking the same oath you did to protect and defend the constitution not Al Qaeda terrorists.
This is confusion on the part of you and others who believe this does anything to promote al-Qaeda or assist them in their efforts to spread Islamic terror. The fact that al-Qaeda is in Syria fomenting revolution and working to overthrow the Assad government, and the fact that we are considering action against the same government for using chemical weapons on their own people, are two separate story lines. Bombing Syria in an effort to hasten the fall of the Assad regime may put us on the same side with al-Qaeda temporarily, but it does nothing to promote al-Qaeda's agenda.
This is not World War II, during which we fed materiel and weaponry to our bitter enemies, the Soviets. We aren't assisting al-Qaeda in any effective way, and we certainly aren't funding their efforts against Assad or any other government. In the end, the Syrian people do not appear willing to accept governance at the hands of yet another totalitarian regime, which is the only kind of government fundamentalist Islam seems to be able to generate.
Uh huh ... anyone can post anything on youtube. Doesn't mean squat, just like most of your posts.Looks like it's time for another Reality Check.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnkWYggHsy8
Make that two reality checks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxqYnxrxHX8