Another Blow to Saturday Resurrection sababatarian theory!

[Hark]

You're too holy for anything. At this rate I see you translated like Enoch any time

Romans 11:16 For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.

It is the progress of this discussion that is not serving Him.

I am hoping He will change it back to the way He wants it, but I am bowing out, brother. Too much biting and devouring going on in there.

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

2 Timothy 2:24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, 25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

You have to know when to let it go. You may need His help to do that. I do, but you can walk away in Christ's love for He will help you do it too.

Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

 

[vooks]

Romans 11:16 For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.

It is the progress of this discussion that is not serving Him.

I am hoping He will change it back to the way He wants it, but I am bowing out, brother. Too much biting and devouring going on in there.

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

2 Timothy 2:24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, 25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

You have to know when to let it go. You may need His help to do that. I do, but you can walk away in Christ's love for He will help you do it too.

Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

I thought you left. Adios and see you at the marriage supper

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

Romans 11:16 For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.

It is the progress of this discussion that is not serving Him.

I am hoping He will change it back to the way He wants it, but I am bowing out, brother. Too much biting and devouring going on in there.

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

2 Timothy 2:24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, 25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

You have to know when to let it go. You may need His help to do that. I do, but you can walk away in Christ's love for He will help you do it too.

Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

Vooks, are you here?

Then listen here!

SHAME ON YOU!

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

It is not proof but prove! Go back to school

Can you be humble for once in your wretched and unproductive life and withdraw the Angel-less visit to the tomb by women claim, and unconditionally apologize for denying this.

After this you may want to hypothesize about my intent. But I will not have your puny brains overheating trying to second guess me, my intent is to demolish your moronic 'synopsis' bit by bit.

Thanks, to prove, proof --- what Vooks can spell, but fails to do.

 

[vooks]

Thanks, to prove, proof --- what Vooks can spell, but fails to do.

Third day is day after tomorrow. This saith Holy Spirit
Jesus rose the third day
He died the day before the day he resurrected

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

Emphasis CGE . . .

… withdraw the Angel-less visit to the tomb by women claim, and unconditionally apologize for denying this.

. . . HUH?!

Why did you deny advancing an angel-less tomb visit by the women?

. . . HUH?!

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

So, what took you eternities to respond to such a question?

Are you bipolar because if you are I can excuse your frail recollection of what you said

Once again,

I'm glad you have succeeded in derailing this powerful rebuttal to Saturday resurrection idiocy, but it is well.

Were the women informed of Jesus' resurrection on each of their 'three' trips to the tomb by an angel/angels?

Watch yourself digressing and pretending the question to be non-existent.

Just keeping this for reference.


Vook's question at first: April 15 2015#10

You for once failed to prove an angel-less visit to the tomb by women yet you tout it as facts. Shameless boer

Vook’s question intermediate: 4.12 AM today#25

So please show me a single visit to the tomb by women where there were no angels Or one which had angels but they never informed the women of the resurrection

Vook's question at present: Today at 8.02 AM

Were the women informed of Jesus' resurrection on each of their 'three' trips to the tomb by an angel/angels?

How long did it take Vooks to formulate his latest versions of his question?

From 4.12 AM Today until 8.25 AM today --- with GE leading him like Gretel Hänsel through to himself, unknown territory. How would I have known? Because I kept to the Text to lead me. But Vooks did not.

For nearly 10 months Vooks had one thing on his mind, but never realised what it was ---something I never gave a moment’s thought : because I simply stuck to the Text. But Vooks did not.


But he is a clever man, this Vooksie of us. Quick enough, very quick was he to see, o @@@@ here comes trouble! Make it look like it’s old GE who’s the retard.


But 10 months ago old GE already questioned Vooks what is it, Vooksie, said old GE, what’s up that upsets you so with regard to women’s ~trips~ to the grave?


Originally Vooks had a skirmish with someone else on BB who dared ask him something about a woman – Singular and he nearly blue his top off.


Now again, dear Vooks, I ask you again, WHAT FOR? UNTIL WE HAVE FOUND OUT W.T.H. IS GOING ON [apologies president Trump] I can’t be of any help to you : WHAT IS THE RELEVANCE?! Relevance to anything you can tell me about with regards to the day and time of day on which Jesus Resurrected?!


It will really help – if not you, then me!

 

[percho]

Matthew 12:40 doesn't say "~hades~";
Matthew 12:40 doesn't say "~sending to Hades~";
Matthew 12:40 doesn't say "~departed Hades~";
Matthew 12:40 doesn't say "~his soul~";

Matthew 12:40 says, retrospectively "the Son of Man shall have been in the heart of the earth, three days and three nights".

It says it of the Divine Human Being "the Son of Man" the Son of God ---the whole Man of Nazareth of whatever constituted his constitution of body, person, spirit flesh and blood, mind and soul ---the very One and Same who in PERSON, SUFFERED alive, living, willing, consciously, obediently at once fulfilling all his Father's will, Eternal Purpose and Council in Full Fellowship of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

I thought that was what I basically said, Jesus, the living soul, born to the virgin Mary said, "the Son of Man would be___"

Correct Matt 12:40 does not say anything about Hades but Acts 2:27,32 does. Matt 12:40 does say, will be in the heart of the earth. Was, "Jesus," whatever constituted, the whole of, "Jesus," was it dead for that period of time or was whatever constituted the whole of the person, "Jesus," alive for that period of time?

Did Christ die for the ungodly or not die? Give his life a ransom?

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

So, what took you eternities to respond to such a question?

Are you bipolar because if you are I can excuse your frail recollection of what you said

Once again,

I'm glad you have succeeded in derailing this powerful rebuttal to Saturday resurrection idiocy, but it is well.

Were the women informed of Jesus' resurrection on each of their 'three' trips to the tomb by an angel/angels?

Watch yourself digressing and pretending the question to be non-existent.

#47Just keeping this for reference.


Vook's question at first: April 15 2015#10

You for once failed to prove an angel-less visit to the tomb by women yet you tout it as facts. Shameless boer

Vook’s question intermediate: 4.12 AM today#25

So please show me a single visit to the tomb by women where there were no angels Or one which had angels but they never informed the women of the resurrection

Vook's question at present: Today at 8.25 AM#38

Were the women informed of Jesus' resurrection on each of their 'three' trips to the tomb by an angel/angels?

Emphasis CGE: . . .

So, what took you eternities to respond to such a question?

Are you bipolar because if you are I can excuse your frail recollection of what you said


Once again,

I'm glad you have succeeded in derailing this powerful rebuttal to Saturday resurrection idiocy, but it is well.


Were the women informed of Jesus' resurrection on each of their 'three' trips to the tomb by an angel/angels?


Watch yourself digressing and pretending the question to be non-existent.

 

[vooks]

#47Just keeping this for reference.


Vook's question at first: April 15 2015#10



Vook’s question intermediate: 4.12 AM today#25



Vook's question at present: Today at 8.25 AM#38


Emphsis CGE: . . .

[Edited: Name Calling]

How old are you?

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

I thought that was what I basically said, Jesus, the living soul, born to the virgin Mary said, "the Son of Man would be___"

Correct Matt 12:40 does not say anything about Hades but Acts 2:27,32 does. Matt 12:40 does say, will be in the heart of the earth. Was, "Jesus," whatever constituted, the whole of, "Jesus," was it dead for that period of time or was whatever constituted the whole of the person, "Jesus," alive for that period of time?

Did Christ die for the ungodly or not die? Give his life a ransom?

If Christ did not die for the ungodly I and you would be in our ungodliness and lost-ness still. And resurrected Christ not : "from the dead", i and you would be even worse off.

"I have power to lay down my Life and I have power to take up my Life again." It is the same Power and only Power with which God forgives sins.

 

[vooks]

If Christ did not die for the ungodly I and you would be in our ungodliness and lost-ness still. And resurrected Christ not : "from the dead", i and you would be even worse off.

"I have power to lay down my Life and I have power to take up my Life again." It is the same Power and only Power with which God forgives sins.

Very true. You can make sense if you are not high on Sabbatarianism