Ladies and gentlemen,
I take the liberty of making a factual and technical opinion and an objection to the introduction of the Covid 19 mandatory vaccination law planned for February 1, 2022. I see my qualification for this objection justified as follows: I am retired Univ. Prof. of the University of Innsbruck and worked from 1968 to 2005 at the "Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunological Department" (a state primary clinic), initially as an assistant doctor, then as an Executive senior physician and finally worked on the board for 17 years.
The central topic of our daily work was the immunological assurance of the tolerance of the blood cells to be transfused, in particular the red blood cells and platelets, as well as the testing of tissue characteristics for organ and stem cell transplants. It was important to carefully select blood products according to blood groups and to take any antibodies against these cells into account. If necessary, patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemias also had to receive transfusions. The cause of these diseases is, among other things, the administration of various drugs that can give rise to a change in the surface of the blood cells. These changes result in neo-antigens that are recognized by the patient's immune system as foreign and lead to the death of these blood cells. The underlying degradation mechanisms are part of the basic immunological knowledge of doctors and can be confirmed in detail by laboratory tests.
This brings me straight to the administration of mRNA-containing substances that are incorrectly referred to as vaccines or serums and after penetrating the bloodstream first penetrate the vascular wall cells and subsequently lead to the formation of spike proteins on the surface of the vascular wall cells. These spikes actually act as foreign antigens (similar to drug-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia) and are supposed to lead to the formation of antibodies and thus to immunity. The problem, however, is that the spikes adhere to the body's own cells for at least a certain period of time, probably permanently, and the activated killer cells or antibodies (if the vaccination works!) Destroy the cells of the vaccinated person that are externally marked with spikes. The consequence is an immunological cell and tissue destruction in the vaccinated persons, which leads to the well-known thromboembolism, to the destruction of heart muscle cells, lung and kidney tissue, and ultimately to exhaustion of the immune system.
Booster vaccinations intensify these effects because fresh spikes that have arisen from the booster encounter antibodies that have now formed.
As a result, there is a high probability that acute and autoimmune reactions will arise as long-term consequences and dormant infections such as tuberculosis will be reactivated, which will endanger the health system more than is possible due to the proportion of healthy, vaccine-critical non-vaccinated people. In the latter, a relatively high natural immunization rate must be expected because weak and subclinical courses are not recorded.
The introduction of a mandatory vaccination with administrative penalties for non-vaccinating people, which can bring many people to their limits of existence, is not proportionate, so I expressly advise against the introduction of mandatory vaccination in generaland in particular with the use of genetic material-containing ingredients. Punishments are a means of pressure that leads to psychological stress on our fellow human beings, so that compulsory vaccination de facto becomes compulsory (!).
It is frightening that colleagues including so-called experts who, out of immunological ignorance and / or disinterest, or under pressure, disregard the Hippocratic oath and advise their patients and their children to vaccinate or carry out the latter themselves!
Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Diether Schönitzer
I take the liberty of making a factual and technical opinion and an objection to the introduction of the Covid 19 mandatory vaccination law planned for February 1, 2022. I see my qualification for this objection justified as follows: I am retired Univ. Prof. of the University of Innsbruck and worked from 1968 to 2005 at the "Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunological Department" (a state primary clinic), initially as an assistant doctor, then as an Executive senior physician and finally worked on the board for 17 years.
The central topic of our daily work was the immunological assurance of the tolerance of the blood cells to be transfused, in particular the red blood cells and platelets, as well as the testing of tissue characteristics for organ and stem cell transplants. It was important to carefully select blood products according to blood groups and to take any antibodies against these cells into account. If necessary, patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemias also had to receive transfusions. The cause of these diseases is, among other things, the administration of various drugs that can give rise to a change in the surface of the blood cells. These changes result in neo-antigens that are recognized by the patient's immune system as foreign and lead to the death of these blood cells. The underlying degradation mechanisms are part of the basic immunological knowledge of doctors and can be confirmed in detail by laboratory tests.
This brings me straight to the administration of mRNA-containing substances that are incorrectly referred to as vaccines or serums and after penetrating the bloodstream first penetrate the vascular wall cells and subsequently lead to the formation of spike proteins on the surface of the vascular wall cells. These spikes actually act as foreign antigens (similar to drug-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia) and are supposed to lead to the formation of antibodies and thus to immunity. The problem, however, is that the spikes adhere to the body's own cells for at least a certain period of time, probably permanently, and the activated killer cells or antibodies (if the vaccination works!) Destroy the cells of the vaccinated person that are externally marked with spikes. The consequence is an immunological cell and tissue destruction in the vaccinated persons, which leads to the well-known thromboembolism, to the destruction of heart muscle cells, lung and kidney tissue, and ultimately to exhaustion of the immune system.
Booster vaccinations intensify these effects because fresh spikes that have arisen from the booster encounter antibodies that have now formed.
As a result, there is a high probability that acute and autoimmune reactions will arise as long-term consequences and dormant infections such as tuberculosis will be reactivated, which will endanger the health system more than is possible due to the proportion of healthy, vaccine-critical non-vaccinated people. In the latter, a relatively high natural immunization rate must be expected because weak and subclinical courses are not recorded.
The introduction of a mandatory vaccination with administrative penalties for non-vaccinating people, which can bring many people to their limits of existence, is not proportionate, so I expressly advise against the introduction of mandatory vaccination in generaland in particular with the use of genetic material-containing ingredients. Punishments are a means of pressure that leads to psychological stress on our fellow human beings, so that compulsory vaccination de facto becomes compulsory (!).
It is frightening that colleagues including so-called experts who, out of immunological ignorance and / or disinterest, or under pressure, disregard the Hippocratic oath and advise their patients and their children to vaccinate or carry out the latter themselves!
Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Diether Schönitzer
