Back by “Popular” Demand—Christ is Risen!

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Someone noted that no “Easter” threads had been started. So, here’s one.
(Oh, and the “popular” refers to God, not man.)

Any way you slice it, scholarship says, “Christ is risen!” “He’s risen indeed!”

So argues Gary Habermas. (NOTE: There is more than one link in this OP.)

“Gary Habermas' talk entitled 'The Resurrection Evidence that Changed a Generation of Scholars' takes us through recent developments in historical scholarship which allow even a sceptic to infer the Resurrection of Jesus from established facts of the New Testament that even critical scholars generally accept.”


Resurrection Evidence that Even Critical Scholars Accept


Gary Habermas: The Resurrection Evidence that Changed Current Scholarship

 

[37818]

 

[John of Japan]

Someone noted that no “Easter” threads had been started. So, here’s one.
(Oh, and the “popular” refers to God, not man.)

Any way you slice it, scholarship says, “Christ is risen!” “He’s risen indeed!”

So argues Gary Habermas. (NOTE: There is more than one link in this OP.)

“Gary Habermas' talk entitled 'The Resurrection Evidence that Changed a Generation of Scholars' takes us through recent developments in historical scholarship which allow even a sceptic to infer the Resurrection of Jesus from established facts of the New Testament that even critical scholars generally accept.”


Resurrection Evidence that Even Critical Scholars Accept


Gary Habermas: The Resurrection Evidence that Changed Current Scholarship

Thanks for posting this. I listened to the whole thing and it was great!

I took an apologetics course from Dr. Habermas back in 1993 on furlough from Japan that was extremely helpful. This was at Tennessee Temple (before it went kaput) where he had come as an adjunct.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Thanks for posting this. I listened to the whole thing and it was great!

I took an apologetics course from Dr. Habermas back in 1993 on furlough from Japan that was extremely helpful. This was at Tennessee Temple (before it went kaput) where he had come as an adjunct.

Thanks. I've never met him, but think the same about his presentation.

A natural skeptic scholarly enough to soundly answer the questions of skeptics of the NT.