Broad coalition .... not SO broad?

[righteousdude2]

Obama may be feeling the affects of being a poor ally in his first six years as no one seems to be joining his call to help target the terrorists. He should have played nice, and been less cocky. It seems his audacious attitude is haunting any attempts to build a BROAD coalition to assist us in a war declared on us by the JV Team from the mid East.

Do you think others will join and help deliver the bombs to scatter the thugs and murders? Or was Obama's footloose approach to foreign policy , to date, costing us and sending us to do battle on our own?

 

[carpro]

Obama can't build much of a coalition.

Our normal allies don't trust him and he still refuses to recognize who the enemy is.

 

[righteousdude2]

Obama can't build much of a coalition.

Our normal allies don't trust him and he still refuses to recognize who the enemy is.

If we get it and those sworn to protect us don't .... that does not exude much confidence.

Raising funds is easier than raising help to fight a non existent religious group, that has declared a one way war against an enemy that is nothing more than junior varsity. Our allies think we should be able to finish off the JV with little problems. I mean we don't even need Kobe for this task. :laugh:

 

[church mouse guy]

0bam@'s political idea is to bomb with American planes and to fight on the ground with foreign troops. It's the old let's you and him fight. I can't imagine who would want in on that plan of the Democrats. The Democrats do not want to admit that they made another mistake about Iraq.