• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

California Bill to Mandate Teaching G@y History!

The California Bill Would Cause You...

  • ...to take your child(ren) out of public schools

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • ...do nothing, it is something that is needed in education

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ...to start home schooling your child(ren)

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • ...to join others in overturning the legislation in your state

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • ...put my child in a Christian school

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • ...other (please explain in comment section)

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The attached article, is just one of many reporting on the pending California legislation that would mandate children (in public schools) be taught LGBT history in social science classes that currently teach black history and women's history.

Please take a few minutes and provide your opinions of this pending legislation as well as providing answers on the accompanying poll.

Thanks . . .

SEE:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/16/us/16schools.html?_r=1



Shalom,

Pastor Paul :type:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
I'd start with teaching about Old Testament era and what they did to g@ys. Then add Romans 1 about what Jesus taught.

These are historic facts. Can't rewrite history.

(Thankfully my children never attended government schools one day in their K-12 years)
 
I'd start with teaching about Old Testament era and what they did to g@ys. Then add Romans 1 about what Jesus taught.

These are historic facts. Can't rewrite history.

(Thankfully my children never attended government schools one day in their K-12 years)

Very well stated, Brother!! :thumbs:


I have no problem teaching gay history, provided they are talking of the "gay 90's"....wasn't that what they called the 1890's????
 

HAMel

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Judge that overturned the vote regarding Proposition 8, regarding same sex marriage, is a homosexual himself. He claims to have had a 10 year relationship with some doctor.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=287077

His decision has now opened the door for more of this nonsense.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

I frequently visit a worldly Forum Board and don't hesitate to post about all things proper along with sharing the Gospel. People come out of the woodwork in opposition against me.

The younger generation holds that homosexuality, abortion, having children out of wedlock, living together, consumption of drugs, etc., is absolutely normal and that I need to go away because I still live in the Beaver Cleaver days.

It's all quite funny while sad at the same time.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Genesis 19:4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:​

Not just the "jet set" class but old and young as well were corrupted.​
California thereby fulfilling Christ's prophecy.

Luke 17
29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

Like Abraham, we need to plead with God for the corrupted ones but not for the sake of the righteous (those declared righteous, who will be delivered from wrath) but for mercy's sake.​

2 Timothy 2
24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
26 And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.


HankD​
 

MamaCW

New Member
i wouldnt vote for that bill to pass..
We've already decided to put our little one in the christian school anyway :)
 

freeatlast

New Member
The attached article, is just one of many reporting on the pending California legislation that would mandate children (in public schools) be taught LGBT history in social science classes that currently teach black history and women's history.

Please take a few minutes and provide your opinions of this pending legislation as well as providing answers on the accompanying poll.

Thanks . . .

SEE:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/16/us/16schools.html?_r=1



Shalom,

Pastor Paul :type:

First I don't ues the term "gay" as it seems to justify their sin or lifestyle if some prefer. They are homosexuals and that is how I refer to them although I do not slander them or use it to put them down. That being said while I realize there is no real hope of this I still do hope they go back to the beginning and show what was prescribed to happen to ayone who was engaged in homosexuality which I feel should still be practiced today.
 

JohnDeereFan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The attached article, is just one of many reporting on the pending California legislation that would mandate children (in public schools) be taught LGBT history in social science classes that currently teach black history and women's history.

Please take a few minutes and provide your opinions of this pending legislation as well as providing answers on the accompanying poll.

Thanks . . .

SEE:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/16/us/16schools.html?_r=1



Shalom,

Pastor Paul :type:


Yet another reason we won't send our children to government indoctrination centers.

I wonder if they'll mention that GRID (the pre-politically correct name for AIDS) could have been stopped relatively easily before it became an epidemic if it weren't for the indiscriminate sex in San Francisco's gay bathhouses or the fight the homosexuals put up when they tried to close those bathhouses.

But on the other hand, I have no doubt that they'll say it was all mean ol' Reagan's fault.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
First I don't ues the term "gay" as it seems to justify their sin or lifestyle if some prefer. They are homosexuals and that is how I refer to them although I do not slander them or use it to put them down. .

Free, I agree with you 100+ % :1_grouphug: :thumbsup:
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
FAL and Salty. . .

. . I don't disagree with you on your observation of the term g@y. I just wanted to avoid having to water down the word with #*@%'s etc. I know that on the board, people appreciate our covering the word, or hiding it. Can you imagine what I would have had to do? Board friendly "homosexual" would look like this - h*m#se%ual :laugh:

You make a great point though, and like you guys, I call them what I see them as: SINNERS, in need of being saved, repenting and turning away from their CHOSEN lifestyle!

I do not agree with others that they are born h*m#se%ual. It is a choice, like abortion, drinking, drugs, sexual sin, fornication, adultery, etc. It must be recognized as being against God's natural order for men and women, and a change of heart and direction is ALL that will return them to the place where God created them to be: "On that narrow path, leading to that narrow gate!"

Thanks for your words and views.

Pastor Paul :type:
 
Top