Rew_10 said:
And yet, thousands of scientists say that this "science" is wrong. I mean, do you just think that they can't grasp you and your husbands ideas? Mainsteam science doesn't start off with an answer as you do. You and your husband find and fabricate the ideas that make the Bible fact.
Rew, you have it exactly backwards about something. After I resigned from teaching, I ended up, almost accidently, as a freelance science editor. I worked with men on both sides of the evolution/creation issue, helping get articles ready for submission for publication. I saw something that bothered me greatly -- up until one person, every single man I worked with on BOTH sides was going theory first and trying to cram data into it, ignoring other data, or marginalizing it.
There was one man who had the courage to go data first, convinced that God had not lied in His creation. And that person was Barry. He started out being stunned by the fact that there were three hundred years of measurements of light speed which showed that it had been steadily decreasing. The error bars were much smaller than the decreases measured. This was a major subject of discussion in scientific journals until 1941, when Birge, the 'keeper of the constants' at UC Berkeley, simply DECLARED that any belief that the constants were changing (and a number of them had been measured as changing, not just the speed of light), was contrary to the spirit of science as it was then known. One has to wonder what 'spirit of science' he was talking about, as it seemed to be divorced from a search for the truth!
However, Barry had been taught, as we all had, that c is constant, and so he figured that there must be some regular error in observation or mathematics and he gave himself about two weeks to clear the matter up.
It is 28 years later now, and he has simply kept following the data. He is humble enough to be corrected on matters and has been. Several years ago (about three as I recall now), a physicist from Spain very arrogantly corrected him on a matter. Barry took a look at the man's emails and said, "You know, he's right." And he retracked on his work on the Zero Point Energy, figured it as part of a recombination of Planck Particle Pairs, which is what the man said he had been ignoring, and the results were two major papers in the Journal of Theoretics. You will find them as the last two research papers on his website.
He is EXTREMELY careful about his research. So no, he does not start off with the answer (which, in fact, modern science does where evolution and long ages are concerned). This is why he started out as a long-ager and a theistic evolutionist and is now a young ager and a creationist. It was the data which convinced him, and that took some time. It is hard to change a world view. Most people refuse, despite any facts. He wanted the truth more than he wanted anything else.
So before you accuse him of anything, I would suggest you check into his work. The data is there. The math is there. The logic is there. Essentially, what he has done, actually, is take the work from other very respected mainstream scientists and researchers and looked at it, put it together and said, "look, see where this leads?"
If people refuse to see that, there is nothing he can do. He is presenting the truth he has found as simply a result of the data they have all collected. So please don't accuse him of fabricating anything until you know what you are talking about.
raying: And good luck with your exam.