Calvinism... THE SEQUEL!

[tragic_pizza]

Just trying to help, TP. :thumbs:

By (yet again) misrepresenting Reformed theology?

Thanks, but no.

 

[Blammo]

By (yet again) misrepresenting Reformed theology?

Yes, and I will continue to do so, as long as you guys keep misrepresenting it to me. :tongue3:

 

[tragic_pizza]

Yes, and I will continue to do so, as long as you guys keep misrepresenting it to me. :tongue3:

So you're saying that people, like me, who are students of Reformed theology, are misrepresenting it?

Prove it. Prove I'm lying, or admit you are a liar and apologize.

 

[Blammo]

So you're saying that people, like me, who are students of Reformed theology, are misrepresenting it?

Prove it. Prove I'm lying, or admit you are a liar and apologize.

I don't believe I called you a liar, did I? I don't believe you (personally) misrepresent what you actually believe about it. But, you reformed theology folks (as a whole) have so many different angles and curves, it makes it difficult to narrow it down.

 

[tragic_pizza]

I don't believe I called you a liar, did I? I don't believe you (personally) misrepresent what you actually believe about it. But, you reformed theology folks (as a whole) have so many different angles and curves, it makes it difficult to narrow it down.

We folks are not misrepresenting our views, however little you want to understand of it. Theology, if approached correctly, cannot be a "narrowed" study. God is not a narrow Being, and the study of God is a vast undertaking.

You're calling not me, but an entire branch of Christianity, liars, then. Prove it, or admit you, yourself, are lying, and apologize.

 

[Blammo]

We folks are not misrepresenting our views, however little you want to understand of it. Theology, if approached correctly, cannot be a "narrowed" study. God is not a narrow Being, and the study of God is a vast undertaking.

You're calling not me, but an entire branch of Christianity, liars, then. Prove it, or admit you, yourself, are lying, and apologize.

I haven't called anyone a liar, and I am not apologizing.

You are talking to someone who is trying to understand Reformed theology so I can decide whether I agree with it or not. I have not taken a side in the debate, I remain open minded, but you and your friends have failed to convince me. In fact, all you have managed to do is confuse me more and more with each discussion.

 

[tragic_pizza]

I haven't called anyone a liar, and I am not apologizing.

You are talking to someone who is trying to understand Reformed theology so I can decide whether I agree with it or not. I have not taken a side in the debate, I remain open minded, but you and your friends have failed to convince me. In fact, all you have managed to do is confuse me more and more with each discussion.

Well, what, exactly, is it you;re needing to know?

 

[Pastor Larry]

I'm tired of being told by Pastor Larry I'm basically stupid and have no business talking Scripture with someone so esteemed and learned as himself. There is a way to talk to someone, and this kind of behavior is very unbecoming of a christian, let alone a pastor.

Where have I ever said this? Again you are making false accusations. I have said no such thing. I have said that you don't understand Calvinism. And there is no debate about that. That's not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of public record.

So why are you making stuff up about what I said?

 

[webdog]

It is still YOUR opinion, PL, not "public record". Of course you are going to say I don't know what I'm talking about. It makes you look superior. This conversation is fruitless and is doing nothing but angering me and stroking your ego.

 

[DHK]

It is time to shut this thread down, as it is no longer about Calvinism.