Cancers have become ‘turbo cancers’. Why?

Cancers Appearing In Ways Never Before Seen After COVID Vaccinations: Dr. Harvey Risch

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, SEP 22, 2023 - 10:20 PM
Authored by Efthymis Oraiopoulos and Jan Jekielek via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

There is evidence that cancers are occurring in excess after people receive COVID-19 vaccinations, according to Dr. Harvey Risch.


Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, in New York on July 7, 2022. (Bao Qiu/The Epoch Times)
American Thought Leaders," Dr. Risch said patients must now wait months, not weeks, to get an appointment at an oncology clinic in New York.

here is difficulty in observing whether a vaccine can cause cancer, because cancer usually takes time to develop, Dr. Risch said. It can take anywhere from two years to 30 years, depending on the different types of cancer, from leukemia to colon cancer.

“What clinicians have been seeing,” said Dr. Risch, “is very strange things: For example, 25-year-olds with colon cancer, who don't have family histories of the disease—that's basically impossible along the known paradigm for how colon cancer works—and other long-latency cancers that they're seeing in very young people."

He said this is not how cancer normally develops.

"There has to be some initiating stimulus to why this happens," he said.

Fighting Cancer
Dr. Risch said that in his opinion, cancer is something a healthy human body can fight and disable, as the non-normal cancerous cells are gobbled up when detected in a body with a functional immune system. If the immune system is compromised, however, it cannot cope with the task of neutralizing cancerous cells, and cancerous cells are left to multiply and grow, leading to symptoms of cancer.

“That’s the mechanism I think is most likely here,” Dr. Risch said. “We know that the COVID vaccines have done various degrees of damage to the immune system in a fraction of people who have taken them.”

That damage could translate to getting COVID more often, getting other infectious diseases, or getting cancer.

Another example Dr. Risch gave was breast cancer, which normally, if there is a remanifestation after surgical removal, the remanifestation occurs after two decades. However, vaccinated women are now seen to remanifest breast cancers in much shorter periods of time.

“Those are the initial signals that we’ve been seeing, and because these cancers have been occurring to people who were too young to get them, basically, compared to the normal way it works, they’ve been designated as turbo cancers,” Dr. Risch said.

“Some of these cancers are so aggressive that between the time that they're first seen and when they come back for treatment after a few weeks, they've grown dramatically compared to what oncologists would have expected for the way cancer normally progresses,” he added.

“Be attuned to your body,” Dr. Risch recommended, for noticing any new signals the body might give.

Adverse Events After Vaccination
Dr. Risch also talked about the aspect of official medical agencies not recognizing someone as being vaccinated inside the first two weeks of vaccination. This happens, he said, because the medical agencies say that the effects of the vaccine need two weeks to start manifesting. Adverse effects occurring a few days after vaccinations were officially counted as health conditions manifesting in unvaccinated people, he said.

However, serious adverse events after receiving the vaccine have occurred within the first four days, Dr. Risch said. He said three-quarters of adverse effects are being recorded as happening to unvaccinated people.

The decision makers who were in charge during the pandemic "threw out the principles of public health six days into the pandemic and did the opposite of everything that we knew should be done for respiratory viruses," he said.

One example was the denial of effective early treatment and unnecessary vaccinations, which show a “colossal failure of public health through this period," he said.

Dr. Risch said that a lot of people are now less likely to be “propagandized” regarding COVID, and that news reports about a new variant that is going to take over the world in the next month are “propaganda to sell the next batch of vaccines coming out in a few weeks.”

“People are fed up with this and it’s going to be a lot more pushback,” he said.

Risks to Society
Dr. Risch said that while the individual risk of an adverse reaction to the vaccine is relatively low, once that risk manifests itself at a greater scale, when millions of people have received the vaccine, the result is that hundreds of thousands of people are left with injuries and serious adverse events that are often worse than the virus itself.

Dr. Risch’s opinion is that nobody should get vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine, as the new variants are mild and not life threatening. He has heard of a few hospitalizations that lasted for some days, but as most people had COVID in the past, they have some immunity to these new variants as well.

"There is no reason for people to be vaccinated now, to any degree," he said.

He said COVID has become an illness similar to the flu in its degree of severity, and that propaganda to scare people is being pushed by the government on behalf of pharmaceutical companies to sell more vaccines.

“We live in social contact with each other and therefore spread low-level infections. This is part of human life that we take for granted and we try to treat it the best we can," he said. "That’s how we should be managing this."

 

I will continue to post information in hopes that people will come to the right choice for them. Last year’s covid vax was only taken by 25% of people, but that means one in four here may take it. Maybe your doctor will recommend. Be reminded that medical professionals are still professional in that they are quite well compensated for their service. It is a business. Perhaps their higher up wants a good return on the latest offering pharma has for us all. Doesn’t mean you have to do it. You know the old standby line……nobody forced you to take it.

 

Pfizer’s New Shot Has Only Been Tested on Mice
As for the brand-new reformulated monovalent shot against XBB.1.5., Pfizer’s testing has again only involved mice — 10 mice, to be exact — while Moderna’s version has been tested on 50 adults.22

Some have reported the trial had 100 participants,23 but only 50 received the monovalent XBB.1.5 shot now being rolled out. Another 51 received a bivalent shot containing a mix of BA.4/5+XBB.1.5. So there was no control group.

One person in the XBB.1.5 treatment group reportedly experienced a serious adverse event, giving us a potential serious adverse event rate of 1 in 50. What’s more, they only reported side effects that occurred within 14 days of injection,24 so we have no idea how bad it might be in the longer term. As reported by the New York Post, September 14, 2023:25

"What if I told you one in 50 people who took a new medication had a ‘medically attended adverse event’ and the manufacturer refused to disclose what exactly the complication was — would you take it? And what if the theoretical benefit was only transient, lasting about three months, after which your susceptibility goes back to baseline?

And what if we told you the Food and Drug Administration cleared it without any human-outcomes data and European regulators are not universally recommending it as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is? That’s what we know about the new COVID vaccine the Biden administration is firmly recommending for every American 6 months old and up.

The push is so hard that former White House COVID coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha and CDC head Mandy Cohen are making unsupported claims the new vaccine reduces hospitalizations. long COVID and the likelihood you will spread COVID. None of those claims has a shred of scientific support ...

The questions surrounding Moderna’s new COVID vaccine approved this week are still looming. Pfizer’s version, approved this week as well, also has zero efficacy data and has not been tested on humans at all. We only have data about antibody production from 10 mice.

The FDA, or Moderna (frankly, it’s hard to tell the difference sometimes), should disclose what happened to the patient who took the new vaccine and had a complication that required medical attention. The public has a right to know."

What Does the Science Show?
The New York Post article, written by Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, and Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, an epidemiology and public health researcher at the University of California, goes on to review several of the studies and systematic meta-analyses published over the past couple of years, showing the shots:

• Don’t protect against COVID for more than a few months and make you more prone to infection, hospitalization and death once protection wanes26,27,28,29,30

• Don’t outperform natural immunity (in fact, natural immunity appears to offer better protection)31

• Have a horrendous safety profile — The German Paul-Ehrlich-Institute concluded the shots have a serious adverse event rate of 1 in 5,000 doses.32 Another study estimated the rate of serious adverse events may be as high as 1 in 556 recipients.33

A risk-benefit analysis by Makary and his team published last year also concluded that the college booster mandates resulted in net public harm, injuring at least 18.5 people for every COVID-related hospitalization prevented, plus 1,430 to 4,626 cases of side effects that are problematic enough to interfere with daily activities34

Annual COVID Jab Recommendation Is Insane
Commenting on the U.S. government’s inexplicably lackadaisical attitude toward safety, Makary and Hoeg write:35

"If public health officials get their way, a healthy 5-year-old boy will get 72 COVID vaccine shots over the course of his lifetime, if he has an average lifespan, with a risk of myocarditis after each one. Inexplicably and defying science, the CDC is saying even if a child had COVID three weeks ago, he or she should still get the new COVID shot.

Two of the FDA’s best vaccine experts are gone. Dr. Marion Gruber, who was director of the FDA’s vaccine office, and her deputy director, Dr. Philip Krause, both quit the agency in 2021 in protest over political pressure to authorize vaccine boosters for young people.

Ever since the loss of these two vaccine experts, the agency’s vaccine authorizations have been consistent with an overly cozy relationship between pharma and the White House.

Pushing a new COVID vaccine without human-outcomes data makes a mockery of the scientific method and our regulatory process. In fact, why have an FDA if White House doctors can simply declare a drug to be safe after discussing secret data in private meetings with pharma?

If public health officials don’t want a repeat disappointing turnout of Americans who get the COVID booster shot, they should require a proper clinical trial to show the American people the benefit. Public health leaders cannot afford to squander any more credibility and money on interventions with no scientific support."

Unethical and Indefensible Decisions
Fortunately, the pushback against the FDA’s decision to approve and authorize (under EUA) the reformulated COVID shot without scientific support is widespread and growing. Wastila, for example, commented on the agency’s decision:36

"It is unethical to continue to approve and authorize mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 when the pandemic has disappeared. It is unethical to promote these boosters as safe and effective when it is clear they are not, and the government is ignoring evidence that the vaccines can provide considerable harm.

The fact that these vaccines were authorized for children when a public health emergency no longer exists is unconscionable ...

Both Moderna and Pfizer have failed to deliver on promised post-marketing studies [from prior COVID-19 vaccines]. We have yet to see the results from the bivalent vaccine safety studies in pregnant women; the myocarditis studies in young people also have not been completed nor have most results been shared."

Dr. Pierre Kory, president and chief medical officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), issued a similar statement:37

"It is unconscionable that the government can recommend this booster for 6-month-olds when the FDA has no data on how children might be affected. There is no need to vaccinate healthy children for COVID-19. To give them an untested booster goes against everything we are trained to do as physicians."

Canadian physician Dr. William Makis agreed, stating:38

"There is no ‘COVID-19 emergency’ for children, therefore there is no legitimate scientific basis for an ‘emergency authorization’ of a new COVID-19 booster in this age group. Any doctor still administering COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to children of any age is engaging in medical malpractice."

 

Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London: "At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week. Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel. So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence. No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now." Angus Dalgleish

 

“Turbo Cancers” Are Decimating Young Doctors: 54 Cases Examined

 

A Shocking Discovery Found in the Shots

I recommend not skipping the commenters to the Mercola articles. Some very astute people are regulars there. Mercola & Lindell were recent victims of banks attempting to end their businesses by axing their accounts & credit lines. How is it legal for that to happen but the baker still has to bake the gay cake? Explain it to me like I’m five………….

Oh, & while you’re at it, tell me again about how we are the ‘good guys’ in the Ukranian war when a lot of these ‘Fauci type’ gain of function labs just happen to be there………..There is one big plan being foisted on the world, & your well being is not part of the plan. Or, you can just go on being a willing tool putting blind faith into something other than God. That would be a big mistake. Might even cost you your life………..

 

Doctors can no longer question anything the vaccine industry calls “science” or they get targeted for de-licensing by Dr. Richard “Misinformation” Baron
10/02/2023 // S.D. Wells // 6.3K Views



It has been revealed that a medical board chief who wants to de-license doctors that oppose the Biden regime’s radical COVID agenda happens to be represented by the same PR firm as Pfizer, Moderna and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


President and CEO of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Dr. Richard Baron has publicly targeted doctors since 2021 that he believes have spread “misinformation” about COVID and vaccines. Baron, by way of the ABIM, has successfully revoked licenses from doctors across the country for as little as less-than-100% support for COVID-19 vaccines. Baron expressed his dictatorial authority in a blog post on the ABIM website where he said, “I want to state unequivocally that ABIM can and does take action, independent of state licensing boards, to remove certification from physicians for unprofessional and unethical behavior.”



One doctor who has had their license revoked is Dr. Mary Kelly Sutton. The integrative physician was told she improperly exempted eight children from required school vaccinations. Sutton said she has always prioritized providing parents information necessary for giving informed consent on behalf of their children, but now specialty boards like the ABIM are obstructing her practice with their vague accusations and “egregious overreach of power.”



Before physicians across the country began speaking out against COVID vaccine safety, Baron never displayed a public concern about “misinformation.” Nor did he ever claim to be an expert authority on the subject. But what we now know is that Baron is in bed with Weber Shandwick, a PR firm self-branded as “misinformation and disinformation” experts.




Weber Shandwick is the second-largest PR firm in the world. According to their website, they are experts in strategy & analytics, creative design & content, public relations & marketing, organizational transformation, and crisis reputation & leadership. Vaccine producing companies such as Pfizer and Moderna have contracted Weber Shandwick to promote their so-called miracle of modern medicine.



Pfizer spent 2.8 billion U.S. dollars on advertising in 2022 – the key to their deadly mRNA vaccine disinformation campaign
In 2022, Pfizer spent 2.8 billion U.S dollars on advertising, an increase of 800 million from the previous year. At the same time Weber Shandwick received the big bucks from Pfizer, they transitioned to providing clients with misinformation and disinformation management services. In fact, Weber Shandwick’s Executive Vice President of Healthcare Communications, Strategy & Planning Sarah Mahoney has stated that she “can’t think of a more important topic right now.”



Weber Shandwick’s Big Pharma backed crusade against “medical misinformation” has led them to host several conference panels featuring supposed experts. Dr. Richard Baron, a client of Weber Shandwick who has used the firm to advertise his disgust of physicians with dissenting opinions on COVID, was a panel member at one of these events.



The CDC has even struck up mega contracts with Weber Shandwick. According to the firm’s website, they were tasked with “promoting the vaccination of children, pregnant women and those at risk for flu and increase the general acceptance and use of vaccines.”



It seems that as the dollars roll in, everyone whose opinion aligns with the government and Big Pharma is automatically an expert on ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation.’ Even more so, they seem to have the authority to punish others for having a dissenting opinion. That's called tyranny.



It seems that misinformation and disinformation are the primary M.O. (method of operation) of all things vaccine related these days, and anyone who opposes this misinformation and disinformation is accused of spreading misinformation and disinformation. How ironic.

 

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/did-the-pfizer-vaccine-even-really?utm_medium=email&r=yvy1tdid the pfizer vaccine even really have a drug trial?

worthy of your time.

 

Papers
Eprinomectin: a derivative of Ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostate cancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway
• Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostate cancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway - Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

___• https://archive.md/Ycxty

___• Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostate cancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway - Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

• Author: Angela Samy, Mohamed Ali Hussein, Gnanasekar Munirathinam

Abstract 2320: Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction
• Abstract 2320: Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction

___• https://archive.md/4EaJG

___• Abstract 2320: Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction

• Author: Daeun Lee, Joon Seong Park, Yun Sun Lee

Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth
• https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.717529/full

___• https://archive.li/Fn3aE

___• https://web.archive.org/web/2023072...n.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.717529/full

• Author: Shican Zhou, Hang Wu, Wenjuan Ning

Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro
• https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/39/9/4837.full

___• https://archive.md/pPxW9

___• https://web.archive.org/web/20231003152611/https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/39/9/4837.full

• Author: Kitti Intuyod, Chariya Hahnvajanawong, Porntip Pinlaor

NIH: Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/

___• https://archive.md/S9QuS

___• https://web.archive.org/web/20230831120431/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/

• Author: Mingyang Tang, Xiaodong Hu, Yi Wang

• Video à https://www.bitchute.com/video/NadONSYKjQKU/

___• https://web.archive.org/web/20230708221126/https://www.bitchute.com/video/NadONSYKjQKU/

Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells
• https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00280-023-04589-6

___• https://archive.md/Zavbu

___• https://web.archive.org/web/2023100...ringer.com/article/10.1007/s00280-023-04589-6

• Author: Man-Yuan Li, Jiao Zhang, Xiao Lu

The Anticancer Potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Implications
• https://jlar.rovedar.com/index.php/JLAR/article/view/11

___• https://archive.md/n4304

___• https://web.archive.org/web/20230803124614/https://jlar.rovedar.com/index.php/JLAR/article/view/11

• Author: Narges Lotfalizadeh, Arian Gharib, Ashkan Hajjafari

Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin
• https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/DDDT.S237393

___• https://archive.md/kUoep

___• https://web.archive.org/web/2023000...tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/DDDT.S237393

• Author: Jian Liu, Kun Zhang, Lin Cheng

The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/

___• https://archive.md/tW2zF

___• https://web.archive.org/web/20231008143705/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/

• Author: Mandy Juarez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez

Source
Dr. William Makis "COVID Intel"

https://makismd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-and-cancer-it-has-at-least/comments

This publication above is visible only to his paid subscribers

I do not have a conflict of interest with any of the above


wouldn’t it be a disaster to cure cancer for about 10 bucks? or actually save people instead of forcing high dollar/Fauci invested Remdesivir/chemo/ginned up high dollar drugs that have side effects from hell/fake testing/fear fomenting warnings if you don’t follow their cure?
Oh the unimaginable devastation………..nope can’t let that happen.

 

Johns Hopkins University professor Dr. Marty Makary told the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic during its first hearing on Tuesday "the greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the United States government" and listed multiple examples. https://realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/03/01/dr_marty_makary_the_greatest_perpetrator_of_misinformation_during_covid_was_the_us_government.html https://twitter.com/COVIDSelect?ref...ation_during_covid_was_the_us_government.html






5:45 AM · Oct 15, 2023
·
484.3K
Views

 

EXCLUSIVE RESEARCH BOMBSHELL: Possible Treatment Approach for Management of Post-COVID Vaccination Myocarditis

Treatment for myocarditis & cancer. There is no money in this for big pharma, so you will never hear about it from your ‘care about you’ CDC or FDA. In fact they have cracked down on utube for even hosting such information. Steve Kirsch just testified about studies done on Amish children who are unvaccinated for all the vaccines. The Amish children had no cancer, diabetes, autism, or heart problems. The Amish have an average of seven children, so perhaps they will inherit the earth, heh.


Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer

 

Win/win for the medical profession. First you get big bonus checks for vaxxing your patients, then they return when they suffer the consequences of the vax………..

 

Oncologist: “There Is Now Extensive Research to Support Ivermectin Use in Treating Cancer” Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action, reported
@MakisMD
in a recent article. “They [researchers] have found that if you give higher doses of Ivermectin than what’s been used for COVID-19, that it actually can stop the growth of these cancer cells, it can stop their metastases, and it can actually engage apoptosis and autophagy and kill these cancer cells.”






1:37 PM · Nov 4, 2023
·
987.6K
Views

 

Your wife is amazing. I know how long she has battled. Respect & prayers for her complete recovery. Has she considered ivermectin? I have taken it many times with only positive effects.