JamieinNH said:
This isn't a fair way to look at it. One doesn't have to attend a RCIA course to know the difference between being a Catholic and not. A person can read, learn and decide what is right and wrong without a course.
Yes, that's true! One can read, learn, and decide WITHOUT taking a course, but how do you know you've read and learned the truth?
I can read and learn a lot on my own about and subject or topic, like Methodism, for example, but that doesn't mean I'm automatically right about all the things I settle on regarding Methodism. Does it? There may be things that are so complex or beyond my scope of understanding that I NEED to take a course or class or religious instruction through a Methodist church in order to better udnerstand it. I may even find out how "off the mark" I truly was in some of my ow logical conclusions about Methodists as to what is right and what is wrong.
I am sure everyone will agree that one doesn't need to live he life of a Theft, Murderer or someone that sells drugs to know it's wrong. The same thing can be said about Catholics. You don't have to attend a course to know what is right or wrong about it.[/QUOTE]
You're comapring apples to oranges. Theft and murder are all well known universal wrongs. Even without the commandments to tell us "thou shalt not commit murder" and what have you, we automatically know theft and murder are just morally and ethically wrong for any human being to engage in.
Again, you DO have to attend a course on Catholicism to know what is right and what is wrong about it.
Once again:
I can read and learn a lot on my own about and subject or topic, like Methodism, for example, but that doesn't mean I'm automatically right about all the things I settle on regarding Methodism. Does it? There may be things that are so complex or beyond my scope of understanding that I NEED to take a course or class or religious instruction through a Methodist church in order to better udnerstand it. I may even find out how "off the mark" I truly was in some of my ow logical conclusions about Methodists as to what is right and what is wrong.