Dustin said:
I don't think mode of baptism is dogmatic, or at least it shouldn't be. My own conviction is, reading through Acts, it could be any mode is acceptable. I'm still not clear on the believer's only, or believers AND the household. But from my own thinking, I would go for pouring.
Just a few thoughts.
Soli Deo Gloria,
Dustin
I am very sure that the Believers Baptism by Immersion is the only mode permissible according to the Bible.
1) Believers Baptism:
Acts 8:37 - Philip said,
"If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest" . And he answered and said, " I believe that Jesus christ is the Son of God"
Matt 28:19 - Go ye therefore,
and TEACH all nations, baptizing them...
We cannot teach the Infants.
Mark 16:16 -
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved
He that doesn't believe is not expected to be baptized.
Acts 2:38 -
Repent and be Baptized...
Baptism without repentence means nothing but a disobedience.
Acts 16:31 -
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house(hold).
" If you believe in Jesus, you will be saved, and then your household will believe in Jesus and they will be saved"
This happened actually there:
Acts 16:34 -
And when he had brought them into his house, he set meat before them, and rejoiced, Believing in God with all his household
Jailor's household all believed in Jesus and therefore they were baptized.
2) Baptism by Immersion
- Word Baptizo itself means Immersion.
- Matt 3:16 - Jesus, when He was baptized, went up straightway
out of water ( from inside of the water)
- Acts 8:38 -and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the enuch, and he baptized him.
8:39 - and when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip,.
- Romans 6:3-4: Baptism by sprinkling cannot give this teaching-
4 Therefore
we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as
Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
John 3:23 - And John also was baptizing in
Aenon near to Salim, because there was much water there, and they came and were baptized.
If they were baptized by sprinkling, they didn't need much water.
Baptism by sprinkling came from the paganism, sprinkling so-called " Holy Water" which is quite popular all over the world such as in Asia, Andes Indians, Egypt, Babylon.
3. Why is the Infant Baptism a problem?
Thereby Satan could bring millions of unbelievers into the Christendom, and the churches have become the assemblies of the mixtures of believers and unbelievers, eventaully the corruption of the church.
4. Why is the Baptism by Sprinkling a problem.
It doesn't teach the Death and Resurrection Truth, and moreover the Sprinkling method was never thought about by the believers until the pagan, fake Christians brought it into the church. If the sprinkling was OK, Jesus didn't have to travel from Nazareth to the Jordan river for a long journey. Throughout the history, millions of true believers were killed by the brutal "so-called" Christians who claimed the Baptism by Sprinkling or Infant Baptism. If they were just, they would not have murdered those millions of Christian believers, as Bible never teaches killing people just because of any heresy.
This is why the proper and correct performance of Baptism is so important in choosing the church to attend as Baptism is the starting point of all the obedience after the Salvation. Baptism doesn't give the Salvation. Baptism has nothing to do with the Salvation. It is to be performed unto the person who was already saved by believing, already born again by Holy Spirit.