Closing the Gap in Dispensationalism.

Closing the Gap in Dispensationalism.
Making sense out of Daniel’s 70 weeks using the Septuagint. The bible translation Jesus and the disciples used.

“And thou shalt know and understand, that from the going forth of the command for the answer and for the building of Jerusalem until Christ the prince there shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks: and then the time shall return, and the street shall be built, and the wall, and the times shall be exhausted. And after the sixty-two weeks, the anointed one shall be destroyed, and there is no judgment in him: and he shall destroy the city and the sanctuary with the prince that is coming: they shall be cut off with a flood, and to the end of the war which is rapidly completed he shall appoint the city to desolations. And one week shall establish the covenant with many: and in the midst of the week my sacrifice and drink-offering shall be taken away: and on the temple shall be the abomination of desolations; and at the end of the time an end shall be put to the desolation.” Daniel 9:25–27 (Brenton LXX En)

1) Notice how easy it is to understand this passage when we show how Christ fulfilled it. It simply says Jesus the prince will come after the 62 + 7 weeks. That is after the 69th week, which is another way of saying at the beginning of the 70th week.

2) They will destroy (crucify) him. And he will destroy the city and the sanctuary with the prince (Titus) that is coming.

3) And one week shall establish the [new] covenant with many: and in the midst of the week my sacrifice and drink-offering shall be taken away [on the cross]: and on the temple shall be the abomination of desolations [continued animal sacrifice]; and at the end of the time an end shall be put to the desolation.”

If we compare the Dispensational version, it does not fit and even contradicts the Septuagint translation. Using the English bible, the Dispensationalists turn Jesus into the Antichrist found somewhere in the distant future.

“Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:

H. A. Ironside writes: “The moment the Messiah died on the cross (v26), the prophetic clock stopped. There has not been a tick upon that clock for nineteen centuries [when he wrote this]. It will not begin to go again until the entire present age has come to an end, and Israel will once again be taken up by God.”[ii]

So they start by inserting a gap after the crucifixion. And turn Jesus who fulfilled the prophecy into to Antichrist sometime in the future. With thousands of years now passed and counting.

[A]nd the people of the prince (Antichrist) that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. And he (Antichrist) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.” Daniel 9:25–27 (KJV 1900)

But, for this to happen things must happen before the severed 70th week begins.

One, Antichrist supposedly contracts or covenants with the Jews, and in the middle of the 70th week when he will cause the sacrifice and the oblation to end.

So they think this must mean there will be a rebuilt temple and animal sacrifices before this can happen. So they take it upon themselves to prophecy this will happen. Even though scripture doesn’t mention it.

Also since the people of the prince are Romans, they take it upon themselves to prophesy a restored Roman Empire. Again based on a gap scripture never mentions and doesn’t allow for in the Septuagint. It is all guesswork about what might happen if there were such a gap. And then arrogantly prophesying it will happen.

Based on the idea of what might happen if there were such a gap, the bible scavenger hunt begins. Prophecy buffs world-wide looking for proof texts to support a third temple, a restored Roman Empire and a return to animal sacrifices. Something contextual scripture knows nothing of and, the book of Hebrews rejects.

And more scavenger hunting with many obsessing over the media for clues about a rebuilt temple, a revived Roman Empire, or anything mentioning Russia. And who the Antichrist might be. In my lifetime it was Henry Kissinger, Gorbachev, and President Obama who were prime suspects. Before that it was Stalin, Hitler, or any other tyrant who captured the media. With everything from SS numbers to microchips being the Mark of the Beast.

Often they assign new interpretations to already fulfilled prophecies to bolster their views. The Great Tribulation of AD 70 reassigned to the missing 70th week. The “rapture” on the last day after the resurrection according to Jesus and Paul, moved to the 70th week 1007 years before the end, or there about.

And it influences US foreign policy, tipping the scales towards nuclear war.[iii] Becoming self-fulfilled prophecy based on what might happen if there were such a gap.

Everything from Russia marching on Israel according to a heavily re-written Ezekiel 38. Fulfilled long ago in the book of Esther by nations of the Persian Empire. Now imported into modern times with Ezekiel’s horses, swords, and spears, originally aimed at stealing Israel’s cattle. Turned into submarines, aircraft carries, missiles, tanks, and modern Warcraft[iv] to destroy Israel, not to steal their cattle.

Where did Dispensationalism come from? A brief sketch shows the Jesuits borrowed from an old heresy that inserted a gap in Daniel’s prophecy. Why? Because the Protestants identified the Papacy as Antichrist, and people were leaving the church in droves. The Jesuits countered this trying to prove the Papacy is not the Antichrist. If people would accept the gap version of Daniel, the Antichrist could not be the Pope. Because the Antichrist would not appear anytime soon, but in the distant future.[v]

In time this Counter Reformation lie caught on to where it now covers the world.






This is the Bible Jesus Used


What Bible Did Jesus Use? - Bible Study Tips



[ii] Harry A. Ironside, The Great Parenthesis: Timely Messages on the Interval Between the 69th and 70th Weeks of Daniel’s Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1943).

[iii] Prophecy and Politics Grace Halsell

[iv] The Battle of Gog and Magog Fulfilled in Esther By Phillip G. Kayser · Esther 9:1-32 · 2002-3-1

[v] Dispensational Truth; pg. 5 Clarence Larkin

 

How so?

 

I hope if I'm wrong they will correct me. But so far no serious involvement from any on different forums. I believe I have the truth in the matter.