Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'll take what Jesus says over either of your speculations any day.
And Jesus said to him, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head."
I'll take what Jesus says over either of your speculations any day.
And Jesus said to him, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head."
And Jesus said to him, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head."
We have no way of knowing.
Probably not.
Except that all this statement of yours is, is speculation about what that text means.
This "I BELIEVE GOD!" mess needs to stop.
God's word requires exegesis. Proof texting is the practice of small minded people. I am not saying you are small-minded. I do not know if this is your practice. I just know that you do it here. A person can do something on occasion and it not be his practice.
But this conversation killing, debate dwindling, "I believe GOD!" nonsense that follows some silly proof text posting is beneath the dignity of a board supposedly designed for thoughtful Christians to tackle tough topics in a biblically sound manner.
I agree. It is kind of a ridiculous notion, a thread that is based on Jesus Christ owning a worldly object, as this seems to defeat the purpose of His ministry. In reality, He owns all houses, and everything else that exists. Several of the patriarchs in the OT were wealthy for their day, and Scripture makes this quite clear.SovereignMercy presents Scripture to remove your doubts.
I agree. It is kind of a ridiculous notion, a thread that is based on Jesus Christ owning a worldly object, as this seems to defeat the purpose of His ministry. In reality, He owns all houses, and everything else that exists. Several of the patriarchs in the OT were wealthy for their day, and Scripture makes this quite clear.
One could probably say that some of the disciples had houses, such as Peter, Andrew, John, James and Matthew. They financed their homes at the Synagauge Bank. Their terms were 10 years at 7.77% interest, which came to sixteen unblemished goats per month. When the bank went under, Judas took over the loans backed by silver.
Psalms 50:7-15
7. Hear, O my people, and I will speak; O Israel, and I will testify against thee: I am God, even thy God.
8. I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or thy burnt offerings, to have been continually before me.
9. I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he goats out of thy folds.
10. For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills.
11. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine.
12. If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
13. Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?
14. Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High:
15. And call upon me in the day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me.
If he just did it (according to you), then you just called him "small-minded," which is a personal attack. Please refrain from doing so.Proof texting is the practice of small minded people. I am not saying you are small-minded. I do not know if this is your practice. I just know that you do it here.
Then instead of criticizing SovereignMercy and "usens who are unlearned" why don't you "exegete" the passage SovereignMercy quoted, in its context, and "eddicate all usens"?
SovereignMercy presents Scripture to remove your doubts.
Not inherently. One of the issues is that you're disregarding that at numerous places throughout the Gospels Jesus is referenced as having no belongings beyond that which is on His body at a given moment. I would say in a reading the Gospels and other NT literature that speaks to the economic condition of Jesus and His disciples, when we also understand the nature of itinerate first century rabbinical ministry, it is unlikely that He would have owned a home. In fact we might also point out that any home in which Jesus resided might not have been His own provided the nature of land ownership in this era.
Perhaps more than any other point, it should be reinforced that Jesus' statement about not having a place to lay His head is not automatically referencing a domicile but could have a broader meaning about acceptance in His ethnic community and/or a larger statement about the simple nature of His itinerate ministry.
This is why I have pointed out that we simply cannot know for certain anything about the economic condition of Jesus from the Gospel biographies as they are a kind of literature and genre that didn't need to provide those qualifications. As we consider the few pieces of evidence across the whole of the NT and cross-reference these issues with other data from the Second Temple time period it is less likely that He did, but we simply cannot say for sure.