Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Grudem's Theology is probably the closest, but because there are 57 varieties of Baptists and because any time there are three Baptists that gather there are 5 opinions, no one will agree. An excellent companion volume to Grudem's theology is Gregg Allison's "Historical Theology." I cannot recommend Allison's work enough. Should be required reading alongside the Bible.
Baptists, by and large, hold to an orthodox evangelical theology as expressed by many over the years. James P. Boyce wrote a systematic theology (Abstract of Systematic Theology, 1887) that few have ever mentioned around here. Read it free on-line here: http://www.reformedreader.org/rbb/boyce/aos/toc.htm
Leo Garrett wrote a 4-volume work on Baptist Theology as well as a systematic theology.
There have been TONS of other works written by Baptists of every stripe, but perhaps not collected in a single (or multiple) volume systematic, i.e., many have written on each part of a systematic or biblical (different than systematic) theology in individual volumes.
the main text that I studied the one by Millard erickson, is he held to be sound in baptist circles?
What about Lewis Sperry Chafer theology?
Chafer is dispensational, as is the Dallas Theological Seminary, if that is your bent.
the main text that I studied the one by Millard erickson, is he held to be sound in baptist circles?
What about Lewis Sperry Chafer theology?
What would be the closest counterpart to say calvins Institutes, luthors Theolgy etc?
is there even a commonly accepted biblical theology/systematic theology fro baptists right now?
An excellent companion volume to Grudem's theology is Gregg Allison's "Historical Theology." I cannot recommend Allison's work enough. Should be required reading alongside the Bible.
Was he baptist?
if not, was his work well regarded still though?
Wow, that's a gross over-estimate of Allison's work. No offense but it isn't nearly that good.
On the Institutes by Calvin, remember they were his first writings and went through many adjustments and changes. His commentary on Romans is more sound, from his non-baptist viewpoint.
Erikson is used in some circles and I used it during my time at Southern for a few classes. He is Baptist and moderately Calvinistic in soteriology.
Chafer is not Baptist.
Barthianism isn't even close to fundamental theology. It was adopted by neo-orthodoxy, not fundamental Christianity. "You understand the Bible as you experience it." That was Barth. He lectured briefly at Chicago Divinity School alongside Paul Tillich, the father of modernism and chief proponent of existentialism and depth-psychology. I sat in their classes!!!
Cheers,
Jim