Well, the opium wars and the sale of opium raised great amounts of money for England and helped to make England a world power but didn't do anything positive for China. In the same way, the US has sponsored little wars all over the world and stomped on little countries in order to make us a world power. Policies that were good for America were terrible for South and Central America.
If the ocean level rises millions of people in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, the Pacific Island nations will be in big trouble but it doesn't matter because they are all going to Hell, anyway . . . right? If all those people were dead then there will be less competition for the remaining oil, right?
I have not read the law (has anyone on this list) and don't know exactly how it will effect me. Does anyone on this list know how they will be effected?
But if it costs me a hundred bucks a year and there is a 10% chance it will slow the acidification of the ocean then it is worth the hundred bucks.
I never ceased to be amazed how far off-topic you can get in just a sentence or two.
And, of course, you managed to throw in a cheap shot..."if you
really cared about lost people, you would vote for this bill." Actually, if we care for lost people, we will do for them what Jesus said to do. But hey...I didn't mean to mess up your misuse of Scriptures. Carry on.
Actually, I have read up on the bill. A great deal. It will wreck our economy. Big, big time.
Oh...if you'll give me a million dollars, there's a 0.00000001% chance I can stop global warming, too. Come on...now we're just getting silly.
Apply basic science...the globalwarmingbots sure haven't.
"Acidification of the oceans???" Is
this the earth-ending crisis of the week? I can't keep up. First it was the coming ice age, then it was the hole in the ozone, then it was global warming, then "climate chage"...now
acidification? Good gracious...how are we gonna die next month, global constipation?
The $64 Trillion dollar question is this: How many folks are there in our country like Billwald
- Folks who are gullible enough to believe manufactured data.
- Folks who are willing to say to fascists, "Oh, sure, take my money...my family and I don't need it...and after all...you're gonna save the world..."
- Folks who realize that when government throws wads of money at a "problem," they often create two more.
- Folks who trust what is quite possibly the most corrupt and most stupid congress in our nation's history.
This bill will
not cost you $100/year. Try much, much more. And remember basic economics...this will be a basic operating expense increase on all goods and services. Anyone who denies this would flunk the most basic economics course. Of course, since your concern is with the poor, maybe you should figure out how to help them afford basic costs with this horrible legislation. Yes...I know...taxpayers will "help" them. Does the term "exponential growth" mean anything to you? It will...the group of people having trouble making ends meet...that's what's gonna happen to them.
This bill will
not help the environment. Keep in mind we're going to the term "climate change," because "global warming" is being debunked to fast to be a useful term anymore.
Fortunately, some people are waking up. I just hope it's enough to put a small modicum of common sense into the grey matter of these senators.
Barack Obama IMO has passed Bush II to take the lead in "stupid legislation proposed by a sitting president." I didn't think it was possible to get any dumber than Bush's bailout.