Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
A new bill in Congress would have us all bow down to the will of LGBTQ+. Pray and take a stand!
House Dem: Religious rights must bow to LGBT
House Dem: Religious rights must bow to LGBT
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Equality Act
- Thread starter Reformed1689
- Start date
Yes it should be very concerning. For many years the LGBTQ community excluded a certain class of perversion.
However
Is The LGBT About To Add Pedophilia As Another Protected Sexual Orientation? • Now The End Begins
The recent quotes from Barbara Streisand, regarding Michael Jackson, certainly seem to indicate a move in that direction.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Yes and those who practice this perversion want to remove the age of consent for the practice.
Do a google - I don't even want to post it.
See Genesis 19:4.
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
This has always been part of their agenda, just not explicitly. They initially decoupled NAMBLA due to backlash, not due to practice. They've been active in scouts for decades, perverting the kids in mind and body. We have not yet seen it all, either, meaning this ain't it, but we've all read the Mosaic/Levitical prohibitions, which a host of people rejected.
I certainly don't support homosexuality. But I don't see that there is any difference between that sin and the sins committed by people in heterosexual relationships. Adultery is as much a sin as homosexual practices.
That isn't the issue though. No one is saying homosexuality is worse than adultery. The bill though in effect would make the church and religious institutions accept and celebrate homosexuality (such as perform gay marriages, produce cakes that go against conviction, photograph the event and so on). We could still condemn adultery, but homosexuality and all that goes along with it must be accepted.
The article does a good job of covering other issues the bill will create. Such as having to allow males, even if they are a serial rapist of women, to be housed in a women's prison.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Not only that,what would be the reaction to NAMBLA being accepted by the LGBTQ community as well as these individuals being protected by law by the United States government?
If there were no age of consent then there would be nothing you could do as a parent/grandparent
to protect your children in school from infected teachers!
It is bad enough as is without protecting this kind of sin by law.
Any government which ALLOWS INFANTICIDE and protects child murderers is capable of ANYTHING.
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
This is an especially weaselly argument. The proper comparison is not between homosexuality and adultery, but between homosexuality and heterosexuality. There is no legitimate homosexual relationship. Period. Parading it around as otherwise will have enormous negative effects on children especially. Legitimating it as mainstream will undo society. Anyone who votes Democrat definitely supports it. They are the Progressives and this is what they mean by progressive.
234 House Democrats, Two Republicans Co-Sponsor Bill Forcing Schools To Let Male Athletes Compete On Girls’ Sports Teams
How can the party continue to profess supporting womens rights when this will destroy all womens sports achievements? When everything is brought to true equal, women will rarely if ever win competing against men.
How can the party continue to profess supporting womens rights when this will destroy all womens sports achievements? When everything is brought to true equal, women will rarely if ever win competing against men.
Bunch of perverts.
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
This is what comes of women wanting to be like men, act like men, replace men. And they are far from finished with their progressivism. Could it be that their main champions have always been men who want to be like women, act like women, replace women?
Yes.
With violence as well as the sin of the Canaanites.
Luke 17
26 And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.
27 They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noa entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.
Genesis 19
28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;
29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
The sin of the Canaanites.
Psalm 106
37 Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,
38 And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.
Is there a law being advanced that would protect "rights" of adulterers? Your cluelessness utterly amazes me.
I like that. It's so utterly stupid it will make their foolishness known to the world.
What I'm saying is many proclaiming Christians call homosexuality a sin but never point out those who commit heterosexual sins like adultery. Churches are removed from the SBC for reaching out to homosexuals. Why aren't churches who protect adulterers removed from the convention? In my view this is a clear case of hypocrisy. Those people who commit that sin are not acceptable but our sins are OK.
Adultery is a sin. Correct? It's no less a sin than homosexual sins. Why is it ignored?
Prove it is ignored?