Notice that Paul is using the phrases "what then" and "what shall we say then" over and over again at various spots in the Roman letter. Why? Well, Paul is arguing a case, in legal fashion, and is arguing against a silent critic. That becomes obvious at even a cursory reading. Consider the 9th chapter, where Paul deals with the critic's objections to the doctrine of election. Notice that the same objections are still used today. Paul had his detractors, and well knew their arguments.
So Paul is making a conclusion after he expresses grace, and first he argues against a conclusion of grace inspiring licentiousness, and in fact makes the opposite argument. It is grace that inspires obedience, not disobedience, says Paul.
So Paul is making a conclusion after he expresses grace, and first he argues against a conclusion of grace inspiring licentiousness, and in fact makes the opposite argument. It is grace that inspires obedience, not disobedience, says Paul.