Flaws in Critical GNT known 100 years ago

[Nazaroo]

Now look where this discussion has ended up .....
eish! and I prepared for a proper dish of spiritual food....

No fudging. D.A.Carson is a well-respected Christian scholar,author and preacher. You had better get your facts straight before you label godly men with your less than wholesome remarks.

I don't think you'd recognize a real heretic since you call the orthodox such unsavory names.

I think Carson would recognize this:

"How are you able to believe,
honour from one another receiving,
and the honour coming from the true God
you do not seek?" (John 5:44)

 

[Nazaroo]

You know when you say that kind of shameful thing about the Lion of Princeton you bring disgrace upon yourself.

Its a sad day when the reputation of a University graduate is held higher than the word of God,
and academics imagine in their arrogant blasphemy
they are worthy to 'edit' it on God's behalf:

 

[Rippon]

Its a sad day when the reputation of a University graduate is held higher than the word of God,
and academics imagine in their arrogant blasphemy
they are worthy to 'edit' it on God's behalf:

Whoa,whoa,whoa.Hold your horses there sonny.

You're calling B.B.Warfield a blasphemer now? You are really sinking fast in the bog of your own making.

Btw,Warfield did not just have a University degree from Princeton at just 19 with highest honors,but he was a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary where he obtained a divinity degree in 1876.

 

[Nazaroo]

Btw,Warfield did not just have a University degree from Princeton at just 19 with highest honors,
but he was a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary where he obtained a divinity degree in 1876.

You're just making it worse for Warfield.
The Holy Scripture still applies, and now applies more so:

"How are you able to believe,
receiving honour from one another,
while the honour coming from the true God
you do not seek?" (John 5:44)

University degrees and honours aren't worth the toilet-paper they're printed on:

"...because that which is exalted among men
is an abomination before the Lord God." (Luke 16:14)

But why stop to honour dead men at all, whether good or evil,
even if they were your own father?

And He said to another, "Follow Me.". But he said,
"Lord, please let me first go and bury my father."
Jesus said to him, "Let the dead bury the dead.
But you go and preach the kingdom of God." (Luke 9:59-60)

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

Ag no; how has the standard of discussions sunk on BB....

 

[J.D.]

This person must be a Ruckmanite. Any points he/she may win on argument is lost in worthless venom-spitting.

 

[DHK]

But why stop to honour dead men at all, whether good or evil,
even if they were your own father?

Did Joshua give honour to Moses?
Did the Jews give honor to Abraham?
Did Joseph give honor to Jacob?

Why? Because it is a matter of respect.
Do you use Strong's Concordance? Do you respect the man that did the work?

 

[Nazaroo]

Do you use Strong's Concordance? Do you respect the man that did the work?

No. Men are idiots.

 

[Nazaroo]

This person must be a Ruckmanite.

Pot calling the kettle black?
Looks like the old standard
unproven and demonstrably false ad hominem attack to me.

 

[Nazaroo]

Did the Jews give honor to Abraham?

yes. The Jews (Judaeans) did honor Abraham.
The result was they rejected the Messiah.

Remember this little exchange?

They answered and said to Him,
"Abraham is our father."
Jesus said to them,
"If you were Abraham's children,
you would do the works of Abraham.
"But now you seek to kill Me,
a Man who has told you the truth
which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this.
You do the deeds of your [real] father." (John 8:39-41a)

 

[Rippon]

Naz,I wonder how long it will be before you join the 'band',if you get my drift.

 

[DHK]

No. Men are idiots.

"Do you respect men"
Then the answer is given above.

Are you a hypocrite? Let's ask that one.
Take a look here:

On the one hand, mr.scrivener has done a good reconstruction of the last page of Mark based on the work of James Snapp Jr, and using accurate fonts and the original photos here:

http://nttextualcriticism.blogspot.c...ders-cont.html

This is a post that you made here:

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1638679&postcount=1


So you do respect Mr. Scrivener, a man, even though you say that you do not respect any man and call them all idiots. You are a hypocrite.

BTW, I assume you are a man. Are you also an idiot?

 

[Nazaroo]

So you do respect Mr. Scrivener, a man, even though you say that you do not respect any man and call them all idiots. You are a hypocrite.

Read again, and think again.
I don't respect Mr. Scrivener. I respect the work he did.
For all I know he could be a serial killer.

I think I expressed myself on Scrivener quite well here:
Educating Scrivener

BTW, I assume you are a man.

you assume too much.

Are you also an idiot?

I'm responding to you, aren't I?
Q.E.D.

Thats how to prove someone's an idiot.
Go practice.

 

[Gerhard Ebersoehn]

Nazaroo, What does Q.E.D. stand for?

 

[Nazaroo]

Nazaroo, What does Q.E.D. stand for?

"the Latin phrase quod erat demonstrandum, which means "what was to be demonstrated". The phrase is traditionally placed in its abbreviated form at the end of a mathematical proof or philosophical argument when what was specified as the question to solve — has been exactly restated as the conclusion of the demonstration. The abbreviation thus signals the completion of the proof." (wikipedia, modified slightly)