• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Former Ethics Counsel to Bush Files Complaint Against FBI Director for Latest Disclosures on Clinton

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Republican attorney and former White House ethics lawyer Richard W. Painter claimed that the FBI director “abused” his power and broke the law by sending a letter to congress saying that the FBI is taking additional “investigative steps” into Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server due to newly uncovered emails.

In a New York Times opinion piece published Sunday, Painter revealed that on Saturday he filed a complaint against director James Comey and the FBI for violating the Hatch Act, which ensures “that federal programs are administered in a nonpartisan fashion.”

“This letter, which was quickly posted on the internet, made highly unusual public statements about an F.B.I. investigation concerning a candidate in the election,” Painter wrote. “The letter was sent in violation of a longstanding Justice Department policy of not discussing specifics about pending investigations with others, including members of Congress. According to some news reports on Saturday, the letter was sent before the F.B.I. had even obtained the search warrant that it needed to look at the newly discovered emails. And it was sent days before the election, at a time when many Americans are already voting.”

With less than two weeks until Election Day, Painter said Comey’s claim that the FBI is looking into new emails pulled from the devices of top aide Huma Abedin and her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, could influence the election’s outcome. The situation is further complicated because, as Comey said in his letter, the FBI does not yet know what the emails are or if they are linked to Clinton’s previous investigation.

“This is no trivial matter,” he concluded the piece. “We cannot allow F.B.I. or Justice Department officials to unnecessarily publicize pending investigations concerning candidates of either party while an election is underway. That is an abuse of power. Allowing such a precedent to stand will invite more, and even worse, abuses of power in the future.”


http://people.com/politics/richard-...mey-hillary-clinton-email-scandal-resurgance/
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Hatch Act, the Hatch Act, the Hatch Act - true, the FBI is not exempt from tampering with federal elections according to the Hatch Act, but, really, why would Comey reopening the investigation be a violation of the Hatch Act, but closing it before the conventions not be?

Did Lawrence Tribe violate the Hatch Act in 1992? How about the Lynch/Clinton meeting on the tarmac in early July?
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Republican attorney and former White House ethics lawyer Richard W. Painter claimed that the FBI director “abused” his power and broke the law by sending a letter to congress saying that the FBI is taking additional “investigative steps” into Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server due to newly uncovered emails.

In a New York Times opinion piece published Sunday, Painter revealed that on Saturday he filed a complaint against director James Comey and the FBI for violating the Hatch Act, which ensures “that federal programs are administered in a nonpartisan fashion.”

“This letter, which was quickly posted on the internet, made highly unusual public statements about an F.B.I. investigation concerning a candidate in the election,” Painter wrote. “The letter was sent in violation of a longstanding Justice Department policy of not discussing specifics about pending investigations with others, including members of Congress. According to some news reports on Saturday, the letter was sent before the F.B.I. had even obtained the search warrant that it needed to look at the newly discovered emails. And it was sent days before the election, at a time when many Americans are already voting.”

With less than two weeks until Election Day, Painter said Comey’s claim that the FBI is looking into new emails pulled from the devices of top aide Huma Abedin and her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, could influence the election’s outcome. The situation is further complicated because, as Comey said in his letter, the FBI does not yet know what the emails are or if they are linked to Clinton’s previous investigation.

“This is no trivial matter,” he concluded the piece. “We cannot allow F.B.I. or Justice Department officials to unnecessarily publicize pending investigations concerning candidates of either party while an election is underway. That is an abuse of power. Allowing such a precedent to stand will invite more, and even worse, abuses of power in the future.”


http://people.com/politics/richard-...mey-hillary-clinton-email-scandal-resurgance/
Good. He should be charged and all the wonderful GOPers who have gone on about charging that lady over some emails [emoji19] should be first in line recommending charges against the FBI director.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Hatch Act, the Hatch Act, the Hatch Act - true, the FBI is not exempt from tampering with federal elections according to the Hatch Act, but, really, why would Comey reopening the investigation be a violation of the Hatch Act, but closing it before the conventions not be?

Did Lawrence Tribe violate the Hatch Act in 1992? How about the Lynch/Clinton meeting on the tarmac in early July?

No one is going to charge Comey with a violation of any law, let alone the Hatch Act. Funny though that democrats didn't mind his violation of the Hatch Act with his bogus legal argument not to charge her in the first place. If that didn't influence the election, nothing could.

Continuing the investigation just levels the playing field.

Not to mention the ongoing investigation of the corruption ridden Clinton Foundation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: 777

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My conclusion: NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING will influence this election, not even the will of the people comrades.

HankD
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But don't forget to vote.

But NOT for Hillary.

People of marxist persuasion keep saying that it's not been proven she did anything.

That's because (IMO) anyone who has any authority (hint, hint - AG, FBI) has either been paid off or intimidated or both. You would think these tactics came from a one-time Chicago resident.

She will probably still "win" the RIGGED election.

Why vote then? To let the thieves of our liberty know that the vast majority of citizens will refuse marxism.

We may never know the actual public vote.

HankD
 
Top