Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth and scourgest every son whom he receiveth. If we find scripture where it says that God does not chasten certain people, we may conclude that he does not love them, right? Ps 73:5 and Job 21:9.
Heb. 12:6 is about God, not dawg. Context rules.My son's friend is our neighbor, who is over just about every day. He comes from a broken home where he has numerous step siblings and his father is overseas in the military. Now it is faulty logic to state that since I don't discipline him in the same manner as my son it means I don't love him. The exact opposite is true. Context rules.
Then learn it.Heb. 12:6 is about God, not dawg. Context rules.
Whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth and scourgest every son whom he receiveth. If we find scripture where it says that God does not chasten certain people, we may conclude that he does not love them, right? Ps 73:5 and Job 21:9.
Rom 9:13 Just as it is written, "JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED." NASB
I may be wrong here, but doesn't hated here, mean "love less"?
“Jacob have I loved, but Esau
have I hated.”
It is a terrible text, and I will be honest with it if I can. One man says the
word “hate” does not mean hate; it means “love less:” — “Jacob have I
loved, but Esau have I loved less.” It may be so; but I don’t believe it is. At
any rate, it says “hate” here; and until you give me another version of the
Bible, I shall keep to this one. I believe that the term is correctly and
properly translated; that the word “hate” is not stronger than the original;
but even if it be a little stronger, it is nearer the mark than the other
translation which is offered to us in those meaningless words, “love less.” I
like to take it and let it stand just as it is. The fact is, God loved Jacob, and
he did not love Esau; he did choose Jacob, but he did not choose Esau; he
did bless Jacob, but he never blessed Esau; his mercy followed Jacob all the
way of his life, even to the last, but his mercy never followed Esau; he
permitted him still to go on in his sins, and to prove that dreadful truth,
“Esau have I hated.” Others, in order to get rid of this ugly text, say, it
does not mean Esau and Jacob; it means the nation; it means Jacob’s
children and Esau’s children; it means the children of Israel and Edom. I
should like to know where the difference lies. Is the difficulty removed by
extending it? Some of the Wesleyan brethren say that there is a national
election; God has chosen one nation and not another. They turn round and
tell us it is unjust in God to choose one man and not another. Now, we ask
them by everything reasonable, is it not equally unjust of God to choose
one nation and leave another? The argument which they imagine
overthrows us overthrows them also. There never was a more foolish
subterfuge than that of trying to bring out national election.
Some of the Wesleyan brethren say that there is a national
election; God has chosen one nation and not another. They turn round and
tell us it is unjust in God to choose one man and not another. Now, we ask
them by everything reasonable, is it not equally unjust of God to choose
one nation and leave another? The argument which they imagine
overthrows us overthrows them also. There never was a more foolish
subterfuge than that of trying to bring out national election.
Well, God so loved the world........
kosmos is the word used for the word "world".
Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world(John 1:29).
kosmos used again.
God has no pleasure in the death of the unrighteous, but in His righteousness, they must receive their reward if they die in their sins.
And being a good "non-determinist" I must ask given any such set of circumstances in life, how does one KNOW that they are a result of God's chastening actions? For truly, if honest, we ALL deserve to STAY under such chastening daily. Rather, our heart should be one to consistently ask in "dire" circumstance (even in wonderful circumstances), God please allow me and inspire me to learn more of how to live properly for YOU.
I will make it simple.
Now lets apply this line of reasoning to Matthew 10:37, Luke 14:26, 1 John 2:11, 3:15 and 4:20.The Greek word from Romans 9:13 is typically defined as "to love less" but we need to remember the context places it in comparison to love. It would be more accurate to say it means loveless, than to love less.
That said, let's look back at Mal 1:2,3 which is what Paul was quoting. The word "hated" in verse 3 is:
H8130
שׂנא
śânê'
saw-nay'
A primitive root; to hate (personally): - enemy, foe, (be) hate (-ful, -r), odious, X utterly.
This is the same word that describes God's reaction to evil and those who do evil.
The word hate and abhors are the same Hebrew word.
Psa 5:5 The boastful shall not stand before Your eyes; You hate all who do iniquity.
Psa 5:6 You destroy those who speak falsehood; The LORD abhors the man of bloodshed and deceit.
The word hates is the same:
Deu 12:31 "You shall not behave thus toward the LORD your God, for every abominable act which the LORD hates they have done for their gods; for they even burn their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods.
This places us in a position where we must accept and understand the intensity of God's emotion. To say He simply loves some people less is a mistake. To soften this is to deny an important aspect of God. It undermines the the need to fear, revere, and stand in awe of Him.