• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Guardian Angel

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Bible does speak of angels keeping watch over us but there is nothing in Scripture about each individual having a special angel assigned just for them. So I'd term them "guardian angels" rather than singular. :)
 

Marcia

Active Member
I agree with Ann. There is no indication in the Bible that each person is "assigned" a special angel, though there are Bible accounts of God using angels for believers.

Of course, God is the one who sends His angels - we are not to summon or contact them.

It might be helpful to do a study of angels using a concordance and looking up every account of or reference to angels. Billy Graham has a good book on angels. I would stay away from most books on angels as most out there are not biblical and are not even Christian.
 

Scarlett O.

Moderator
Moderator
Hi, Jeben - I don't think I've ever talked to you.

This commentary below from gotquestions.org summarizes what I believe about guardian angels - especially the last sentence.

Question: "Do we have guardian angels?"

Answer:
Matthew 18:10 states, “See that you do not look down on one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.” In the context, “these little ones” could either apply to those who believe in Him (v. 6) or it could refer to the little children (vs. 3-5). This is the key passage regarding guardian angels. There is no doubt that good angels help protect (Daniel 6:20-23; 2 Kings 6:13-17), reveal information (Acts 7:52-53; Luke 1:11-20), guide (Matthew 1:20-21; Acts 8:26), provide for (Genesis 21:17-20; 1 Kings 19:5-7), and minister to believers in general (Hebrews 1:14).

The question is whether each person—or each believer—has an angel assigned to him/her. In the Old Testament, the nation of Israel had the archangel (Michael) assigned to it (
Daniel 10:21; 12:1), but Scripture nowhere states that an angel is “assigned” to an individual (angels were sometimes sent to individuals, but there is no mention of permanent assignment). The Jews fully developed the belief in guardian angels during the time between the Old and New Testament periods. Some early church fathers believed that each person had not only a good angel assigned to him/her, but a demon as well. The belief in guardian angels has been around for a long time, but there is no explicit scriptural basis for it.

To return to
Matthew 18:10, the word “their” is a collective pronoun in the Greek and refers to the fact that believers are served by angels in general. These angels are pictured as “always” watching the face of God so as to hear His command to them to help a believer when it is needed. The angels in this passage do not seem to be guarding a person so much as being attentive to the Father in heaven. The active duty or oversight seems, then, to come more from God than from the angels, which makes perfect sense because God alone is omniscient. He sees every believer at every moment, and He alone knows when one of us needs the intervention of an angel. Because they are continually seeing His face, the angels are at His disposal to help one of His “little ones.”

It cannot be emphatically answered from Scripture whether or not each believer has a guardian angel assigned to him/her. But, as stated earlier, God does use angels in ministering to us. It is scriptural to say that He uses them as He uses us; that is, He in no way needs us or them to accomplish His purposes, but chooses to use us and them nevertheless (
Job 4:18; 15:15). In the end, whether or not we have an angel assigned to protect us, we have an even greater assurance from God: if we are His children through faith in Christ, He works all things together for good (Romans 8:28-30), and Jesus Christ will never leave us or forsake us (Hebrews 13:5-6). If we have an omniscient, omnipotent, all-loving God with us, does it really matter whether or not there is a finite guardian angel protecting us?


 

Amy.G

New Member
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible
Matthew 18:10
One of these little ones - One of my simple, loving, humble disciples.

Their angels - always behold - Our Lord here not only alludes to, but, in my opinion, establishes the notion received by almost all nations, viz. That every person has a guardian angel; and that these have always access to God, to receive orders relative to the management of their charge. See Ps 34:8; Heb 1:14.

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible
Matthew 18:10
Verse 10. Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones, etc. That is, one who has become like little children--or, a Christian. Jesus then proceeds to state the reason why we should not despise his feeblest and obscurest follower. That reason is drawn from the care which God exercises over them. The first instance of that care is, that in heaven their angels do always behold his face. He does not mean, I suppose, to state that every good man has his guardian angel, as many of the Jews believed; but that the angels were, in general, the guards of his followers, and aided them, and watched over them, Heb 1:14.

The People's New Testament Commentary
Matthew 18:10
Despise not one of these little ones. Not merely one of the children, but those saints whom the world regards as insignificant and unimportant. "To despise" is, literally, "to look down upon," and hence, to neglect. This forbids all caste in the church.
In heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father. The doctrine of guardian angels is emphatically taught in the Scriptures. See 2Ki 19:31; Ps 91:11; Heb 1:13; Ac 27:23. Who can afford to despise the children who have representatives right at the throne of God?

A. T. Robertson's Word Pictures
Matthew 18:10
Despise (kataphronêsête). Literally, "think down on," with the assumption of superiority. Their angels (hoi aggeloi autôn). The Jews believed that each nation had a guardian angel (Da 10:13,20; 12:1). The seven churches in Revelation (Re 1:20) have angels, each of them, whatsoever the meaning is. Does Jesus mean to teach here that each little child or child of faith had a special angel who appears in God's presence, "see the face of my Father" (blepousin to prosôpon tou patros mou) in special intimacy? Or does he simply mean that the angels do take an interest in the welfare of God's people (Heb 1:14)? There is comfort to us in that thought. Certainly Jesus means that the Father takes special care of his "little ones" who believe in Him. There are angels in God's presence (Lu 1:19).
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Acts 12:15 & Matthew 18:10 NIV both state "their angels"

Acts 12:15 isn't speaking of angels at all but John Mark.

When he realized this, he went to the house of Mary, the mother of John whose other name was Mark, where many were gathered together and were praying. And when he knocked at the door of the gateway, a servant girl named Rhoda came to answer. Recognizing Peter’s voice, in her joy she did not open the gate but ran in and reported that Peter was standing at the gate. They said to her, "You are out of your mind." But she kept insisting that it was so, and they kept saying, "It is his angel!" But Peter continued knocking, and when they opened, they saw him and were amazed. But motioning to them with his hand to be silent, he described to them how the Lord had brought him out of the prison. And he said, "Tell these things to James and to the brothers." Then he departed and went to another place.

Matthew 18:10 is not speaking of 1 on 1 but angels that look over little ones:

See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that in heaven their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.

That is a verse that shows that there ARE angels that look over us but it doesn't speak of a specific angel per person.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In Acts 12:15 "it is his angel" does that mean the household of Mark belived in personal angels?

In the context, it could very well mean "messenger" as in Luke 7:24 or Luke 9:52. Both of those contexts are speaking of live people and not angels, and use the same word "aggelos" as in Acts 12:15.
 

jeben

Member
aggelos, messenger as in messenger (angel) from God
Not trying to debate about this just trying to figure this out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
aggelos, messenger as in messenger (angel) from God
Not trying to debate about this just trying to figure this out.

It doesn't always mean a messenger from God.

In the Luke 7 passage, we can see that we're speaking of humans and not angels:

The disciples of John reported all these things to him. And John, calling two of his disciples to him, sent them to the Lord, saying, "Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?" And when the men had come to him, they said, "John the Baptist has sent us to you, saying, 'Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?'" In that hour he healed many people of diseases and plagues and evil spirits, and on many who were blind he bestowed sight. And he answered them, "Go and tell John what you have seen and heard: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, the poor have good news preached to them. And blessed is the one who is not offended by me."
When John’s messengers had gone, Jesus began to speak to the crowds concerning John: "What did you go out into the wilderness to see?


In Luke 9, we again see it's humans it's speaking of:

When the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem. And he sent messengers ahead of him, who went and entered a village of the Samaritans, to make preparations for him. But the people did not receive him, because his face was set toward Jerusalem. And when his disciples James and John saw it, they said, "Lord, do you want us to tell fire to come down from heaven and consume them?"But he turned and rebuked them. And they went on to another village.
 

Marcia

Active Member
In Acts 12:15 "it is his angel" does that mean the household of Mark belived in personal angels?

Yes, I think it means that some there believed that people had personal angels. It could have been a superstition of the time or culture that one had an angel that looked like him/herself.

So this may reflect a cultural belief of the time but that does not mean it's biblical.
 

Marcia

Active Member
And they said unto her, Thou art mad. But she constantly affirmed that it was even so. Then said they, It is his angel.
People's New Testament
12:15 It is his angel. The Jews held that every one had his guardian angel, and the thought his angel had assumed Peter's voice. A mistake, and Luke does not say whether the idea on which it was based is true or not.
Wesley's Notes
12:15 They said, Thou art mad - As we say, Sure you are not in your senses to talk so. It is his angel - It was a common opinion among the Jews, that every man had his particular guardian angel, who frequently assumed both his shape and voice. But this is a point on which the Scriptures are silent.
http://bible.cc/acts/12-15.htm
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
In the context, it could very well mean "messenger" as in Luke 7:24 or Luke 9:52. Both of those contexts are speaking of live people and not angels, and use the same word "aggelos" as in Acts 12:15.
We've just studied this and I agree with you, annsni.

The context of Acts 12:15 is that the people of the house believed Peter had somehow sent a messenger (Mark? perhaps but not definitive) to give them news concerning his imprisonment or instructions about what to do if he were executed.

It makes much more sense than to say Peter's "Angel from heaven" were standing at the gate knocking.... as if an angel from God would be hindered by a gate if God had sent a message to them.

peace to you:praying:
 

Marcia

Active Member
We've just studied this and I agree with you, annsni.

The context of Acts 12:15 is that the people of the house believed Peter had somehow sent a messenger (Mark? perhaps but not definitive) to give them news concerning his imprisonment or instructions about what to do if he were executed.

It makes much more sense than to say Peter's "Angel from heaven" were standing at the gate knocking.... as if an angel from God would be hindered by a gate if God had sent a message to them.

peace to you:praying:

The context is actually that a real angel has just released Peter from prison. I can't see at all from the passage that they thought this was a human messenger!

Since the Jews did believe that people had angels that looked like them, this makes perfect sense. The Bible records in many places wrong views and beliefs held by people.

It serves as a sort of play on words and an intriguing contrast of what God can do vs. what men believe that a real angel has just released Peter - a miraculous event - and then when Peter appears, the people, due to their cultural superstition, think it's some kind of personal angel, when it's really Peter. It's actually kind of humorous.
 
Top