• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Hillary Meltdown

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Source for this story is an anonymous emailer with "Comcast" in their email address.

Wow. That's hard hitting legitimate news ya got there! An anonymous emailer. LOL!

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
VETERAN NBC CAMERAMAN: ‘YOU REALLY HAD TO SEE THIS TO BELIEVE IT…SHE CAME APART – LITERALLY UNGLUED; SHE IS THE MOST FOUL-MOUTHED WOMAN I’VE EVER HEARD…AND THAT VOICE AT SCREECH LEVEL…AWFUL!’

“SHE LOOKED SO ENRAGED THAT WE ALL THOUGHT HER HEAD WOULD EXPLODE…IT WAS A FULL-ON MELT-DOWN, AND THEN SHE SCREAMED SHE’D GET THAT F – – – ING LAUER FIRED FOR THIS. IT WENT ON FOR AT LEAST A HALF HOUR; WE ALL THOUGHT THE EMS WOULD BE THE NEXT CALL.”





Behind the scenes, NBC technicians and cameramen at the Wednesday night, Commander-in-Chief Forum (Sept 7) report that Hillary Clinton was so angry and incensed that she had been ‘blind-sided’ by one question she was not prepared for and had not approved in advance.

“When her time in front of the cameras ended, Clinton shook the hand Lauer extended to her and smiled once more for the wide camera shot and then Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and threw it at the face of her assistant and the screaming started. She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her – she went kind of manic and didn’t have any control over herself at that point. How these people work with this woman is amazing to me. Most of the small military audience were cordoned off, their seating not close to Mrs. Clinton, but certainly they heard her screaming because it was loud…and she really didn’t seem to care who heard any of it.”




... the assistant producer said she was screaming that she wanted to talk to “the idiot who set this mess up…you do not blindside me – ever!” and continued to demand to speak with executives at Comcast, parent company to NBC Universal.



Since Hillary does not allow any staff to have cell phones when she is in their presence, no footage is available, but Hillary will never let this rest. She has made it clear that she wants Matt Lauer to be “persona non grata – for putting her on the spot.”
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What was the cameraman's name? What was the assistant directors name?

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A foul mouth and an explosive temper are Hillary's legacy. It all fits. No one in the media wants to go public. They will be fired by their in the tank bosses. But her history is well known an plenty of known people have quoted her. It is also well known that the media and the Clinton campaign went after Lauer full bore...just like she wanted.
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A foul mouth and an explosive temper are Hillary's legacy. It all fits. No one in the media wants to go public. They will be fired by their in the tank bosses. But her history is well known an plenty of known people have quoted her. It is also well known that the media and the Clinton campaign went after Lauer full bore...just like she wanted.

So another hack article without sources then. Move along folks.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Would you ask the same question - if the charge was against Trump?

Of course. All of the women that accused Trump of sexual assault have given their names, plus names of other people they told about the incidences.



Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
 
Last edited:

Zaac

Well-Known Member
So another hack article without sources then. Move along folks.
Basically. They need something to justify his behavior because they think that folks with God sense think the issue with what Trump did was his language. [emoji57]

Trying to keep convincing folks of that is almost as disgusting as what he bragged about doing.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 

Sapper Woody

Well-Known Member
Of course. All of the women that accused Trump of sexual assault have given their names, plus names of other people they told about the incidences.



Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
Actually, most of the women claiming Trump walked in on them changing spoke on condition of anonymity. An overwhelming majority of the women present there said it didn't happen. From memory, I believe five named women said it happened, 7 unnamed said it happened, and almost 30 said it didn't. But yet people still say it did.

Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually, most of the women claiming Trump walked in on them changing spoke on condition of anonymity. An overwhelming majority of the women present there said it didn't happen. From memory, I believe five named women said it happened, 7 unnamed said it happened, and almost 30 said it didn't. But yet people still say it did.

Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk

But that's OK. It was negative for Trump. Yet information that ties into what we already know is true about Hillary simply has to be false because the poeple quoted wisely won't allow their name to be used. Her vindictiveness is well know and the hypocrisy of the never trumpoers here is on full blown display. They're acting a lot like democrats.
 

The American Dream

Member
Site Supporter
But that's OK. It was negative for Trump. Yet information that ties into what we already know is true about Hillary simply has to be false because the poeple quoted wisely won't allow their name to be used. Her vindictiveness is well know and the hypocrisy of the never trumpoers here is on full blown display. They're acting a lot like democrats.
Your posts are spot on. There are two issues here. One is the women claiming Donald Trump assaulted them. If this were true or it really bothered them, they would have reported it in short order, not 3-5 decades later. The other point is, those expressing support for Hillary Clinton are supporting a common criminal guilty of treason, perjury and murder at the least. That tells me some folks have no respect whatsoever for the Presidency.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Here are the years the incidents allegedly took place:
2013
2007
2005
2005
1997
1997
1993
1992
1992
early 90's
early 80's

So you can stop posting this nonsense that they happened 30, 40, 50 years ago.

The reason why they didn't come forward until now is because Trump said in a nationally televised debate that he had never assaulted women in the manner he described on the Hollywood Access tape. The women heard that, and realized they could get some revenge at Trump by coming forward since he was now vulnerable.

BTW, when is the "street fighter" going to make good on his threat to sue the NY Times over these articles?





Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Here are the years the incidents allegedly took place:
2013
2007
2005
2005
1997
1997
1993
1992
1992
early 90's
early 80's

So you can stop posting this nonsense that they happened 30, 40, 50 years ago.

The reason why they didn't come forward until now is because Trump said in a nationally televised debate that he had never assaulted women in the manner he described on the Hollywood Access tape. The women heard that, and realized they could get some revenge at Trump by coming forward since he was now vulnerable.

BTW, when is the "street fighter" going to make good on his threat to sue the NY Times over these articles?
Today he said that the law suits would be after the election.

HankD
 

blessedwife318

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Today he said that the law suits would be after the election.

HankD
I hope he does follow through on his threat to sue because it would be amusing to watch him try to prove libel when the only thing all these women are doing is confirming what he himself brags about. Although I don't think he will go through with his threat at all. He is all talk, and he is going to be too busy getting his TV station going.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Today he said that the law suits would be after the election.

HankD

He said lawsuits against each woman would be after the election; he said nothing about waiting until after the election for the NY Times lawsuit.

He'll never go through with any of them because he would never subject himself to being deposed.

Over the years he's made at least 40 threats but actually only filled 3 lawsuits.

http://trump-clock.com/

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I hope he does follow through on his threat to sue because it would be amusing to watch him try to prove libel when the only thing all these women are doing is confirming what he himself brags about. Although I don't think he will go through with his threat at all. He is all talk, and he is going to be too busy getting his TV station going.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I don't think he will follow through.

HankD
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He said lawsuits against each woman would be after the election; he said nothing about waiting until after the election for the NY Times lawsuit.

He'll never go through with any of them because he would never subject himself to being deposed.

Over the years he's made at least 40 threats but actually only filled 3 lawsuits.

http://trump-clock.com/

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
I don't think he will follow through on either threat.

HankD
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why doesn't he just ignore the accusations? This story is now 9 days old. Why doesn't he stay on message and not get bogged down in these side issues? Worst. Candidate. Ever.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
 
Top