LeBuick said:Now that was fuuuny...
Huh! About 15 of them (all guys) are living in a house catty-cornered across the street from me. They play that mariachi-oompah music all the time. (I counter with Lynard Skynard)
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
LeBuick said:Now that was fuuuny...
moscott said:1. I would feel more comfortable with Palin than Biden. It's more about the people that surround you.
2. You(and many others) give way too much power to the President. He/She has virtually no power without the House and Senate---it's not a Monarch position.
3. As usual---your fallback, ludicrous response is in reaction to the Dems stance on the war and poverty. 2 things you need to educate yourself on:
A. There is no place in the Bible that says the Government is responsible for taking on the poor. It is up to us as individuals and as a Church----period!
B. Regarding your war comments:http://www.gotquestions.org/war-Bible.html:tonofbricks:
Major B said:Huh! About 15 of them (all guys) are living in a house catty-cornered across the street from me. They play that mariachi-oompah music all the time. (I counter with Lynard Skynard)
ajg1959 said:Hey, thats my 3 year old son. Make fun of me all you want but dont pick on my child.
AJ
BaptistBeliever said:Under Bush the power of the Presidency has increased tremendously. That was one thing I didn't like that has been going on. As I've said here many times, I would far prefer that individuals and the church take care of poor people. It hasn't happened in my life time. I believe it was more common 1900-1959. I think going farther away from that. Do you actually believe the church will step in and do that? I don't. So, it's equivalent to saying that you don't think it's your responsibility to help the poor (not one or two but large numbers) when you say that the church should do that.
BaptistBeliever said:Under Bush the power of the Presidency has increased tremendously. That was one thing I didn't like that has been going on. As I've said here many times, I would far prefer that individuals and the church take care of poor people. It hasn't happened in my life time. I believe it was more common 1900-1959. I think going farther away from that. Do you actually believe the church will step in and do that? I don't. So, it's equivalent to saying that you don't think it's your responsibility to help the poor (not one or two but large numbers) when you say that the church should do that.
ajg1959 said:Oh come on BB...Howard Dean and the powers that be in the DNC took away the delegates from Michigan and Florida because they didnt want Hillary to win..Obama didnt win the nomination....he was placed there, handed to him by the DNC.
AJ
dragonfly said:Sorry, I thought it was a picture of you! :laugh:
PS: Your son looks lovely; I'm sure he is a wonderful child!
Bro. Curtis said:He would look even better in a Red Sox hat.
Bro. Curtis said:Yeah, we get our grand kids, and it's amazing how they wear you out. The best part about it is when they leave, and you can enjoy the memories of the activities you did, in peace.
Bro. Curtis said:49 ? Very good. I've been 47 for a few months. I have a 16 year old daughter, and my marriage gave me 2 grandsons, 8 & 5, and one on the way.
tinytim said:How did Obama get votes in Michigan when his name wasn't on the ticket?
The DNC and their crooks gave them to him...
tinytim said:And they cried foul in 2000... over idiots in FL that are not smart enough to know how to vote correctly!
LeBuick said:The instructions were in English, now how was that fair?
Bro. Curtis said:I'm laughing, but not sure if you meant it as a joke. But even if you didn't, that's some funny stuff.
LeBuick said:Todd would be great conversation but Michelle is better looking.
I guess it depends on if the wife will be there or now. :laugh: :wavey: