Featured If you are anti-Trump, you are pro-abortion

I'll believe Trump isn't just pro-life for his own gain when I see evidence that he actually has a history of doing things for the unborn.
At any rate, while I am staunchly prolife, it isn't the only issue that matters in this election. If Trump is prolife, the majority of his other positions are garbage. There are more things we can do for the prolife cause than make abortion illegal--such as work to provide services and other options for mothers, and support those that exist. (There's a clinic in my area, I know, that runs on donations and provides all their services free of charge.) Also improve the adoption system.

 

"Politics is all about emotions. No reason or logic involved. That is why most political arguments are futile. You can't win an emotional argument using logic and reason."--TCassidy, today

 

I am Republican and am going to vote for Trump, but you are dead wrong about abortion. The Republicans are as responsible for abortion being legal as the Democrats, so you need to check out the facts of Roe vs Wade. The vote for passage in 1973 was 7-2. Of the seven yes votes, five were Republican justices. Since then Republicans come out every four years with right to life speeches and nothing ever happens. Your conclusions are very flawed.

 

You seem awful proud of owning that statement? I can't be sure but I don't think TC made it as a battle cry for you to use behind your shield, but rather a recognition of the failure and hopelessness of trying to logically reason with someone who bases their arguments on emotion.

 

Another strong reason why we need someone like Trump to #DrainTheSwamp!!

 

Yes, I'm talking about emotional, non-logical arguments like Calminian's, "there's no way around it, it's a fact, if you're NeverTrump you are pro-abortion". That's about as emotionally stupid as they come.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

 

unfortunately IMO calminian is technically correct if the events play out that Hillary appoints justices who will further support legalized murder. Not just abortion on demand but euthanasia and eugenics of which Hillary/Sanger has a history of justifying for the "thinning of the herd".

Margaret Sanger.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-planned-parenthoods-years-pursuing-eugenics/

Brave New World (A paraphrase from the book: "all men are created chemically equal" - not exact but close).

To me the two top ranking platform items are anti pro-murder (not just pro-life) and conservative constitutional justices devoted to the concepts of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

HankD

 

Anyone that praises Planned Parenthood and wants to add exceptions to the Republican platform http://www.lifenews.com/2016/04/21/...latform-to-promote-abortion-in-cases-of-rape/
cannot be considered pro life in my book. Anyone that votes for said person can also not be considered pro life in my book. But as this election is showing most evangelicals will vote for anyone with an R after their name meaning that the Republican won't worry about pandering to them anymore.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

This may not be politically correct, but it's a fact. There's no way around it. NeverCastle Christians will own the Supreme Court Hillary chooses. They will own the environment these new justices will create for their children.

 

And the "new and improved" Obama-Hillary-Care plan with government funded abortions from our INCREASED taxes (which has been promised).

HankD

 

For the record, I'm not voting for either candidate. I'm voting third party because I refuse to support either of them and don't want my vote to count for either of them winning. If anything I am hoping this furthers exposure for third parties in the future, which is another reason I'm voting third party, but I'm not so much counting on that.

IMO none of the candidates running are pro-life. Trump is only pro-life because it benefits him. It is too bad I can't vote for a pro-life candidate, but as I said there is more to this election than that one issue. Pro-life is one of many factors in political candidates and not a deciding one. The most good that has been done for the pro-life movement has been done outside of the laws imo. Those acts need more exposure, because if people are so willing to save the unborn they need to be better informed on how to do it.

 

Personally qd, I don't care the motive.
That's why people pay a kidnap ransom, satisfying the greed of the wicked to save life.
I will do whatever I legally can in my conscience before God to end Roe vs. Wade and save millions of more innocent lives.
I'll vote for Trump - gambling that he will keep his word to end and reverse the anti pro-murder Roe vs. Wade decision.

HankD

 

Yes, as we all know, the church is WAY more strict and legalistic now than it was in the 80's!

Astonishing that someone with your acute powers of observation is voting for Trump. Just blows one's mind.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

There's one major flaw with your reasoning: Supreme Court nominees have to be approved through Congress.

If your statement were true, we'd have a liberal majority on the Supreme Court right now. As it stands, the Congress has blocked Obama's Supreme Court nominee, leaving the court at 8 members instead of 9. So there's clear evidence that your statement is incorrect.

SO - "neverTrumpers" can still help control the Supreme Court, as well as Trump supporters if Hillary wins, by ensuring democrats don't hold the majority in Congress.