Insults but no answers! - Seve

[The Biblicist]

Seve rarely misses the opportunity to show his true spirit by insulting all who oppose his interpetations.

However, he never answers questions and objections placed before him.

For example:

1. Two Divine persons in Isaiah 44:6 are called "YHVH" but he says only Christ is "YHVH". The pronominal phrase "and HIS redeemer" proves this.

2. What happened to the DEAD body placed in the tomb of Jesus? Paul said that which was "dead" was RAISED but Seve denies this by saying a PRE-incarnate glorified body was assumed by Christ - 1 Cor. 15:13-19.

3. The resurrected body of Christ is called by Christ Himself a body of "FLESH" - Lk. 24:39 and Luke says "THIS SAME JESUS" whom they had seen and handled for 40 days ascended into heaven (Acts 1:1-2; 11) when Seve says "FLESH" cannot enter heaven.

4. The phrase "ye are my witnesses" in Isa. 43:10 are repeatedly referred to in Isaiah 43:12; 44:8 and yet what they are witnessing to is not that YHVH was "formed" but that He alone is God and there is no other God except him.

5. Seve says YHVH was formed and thus had a beginning as YHVH but scriptures repeatedly say that YHVH is ETERNAL or from everlasting to everlasting.

 

[Revmitchell]

I believe it is against the rules of the board to place someone's name in the title of a thread

 

[Amy.G]

Why do you cast your pearls before swine?

 

[The Biblicist]

Seve rarely misses the opportunity to show his true spirit by insulting all who oppose his interpetations.

However, he never answers questions and objections placed before him.

For example:

1. Two Divine persons in Isaiah 44:6 are called "YHVH" but he says only Christ is "YHVH". The pronominal phrase "and HIS redeemer" proves this.

2. What happened to the DEAD body placed in the tomb of Jesus? Paul said that which was "dead" was RAISED but Seve denies this by saying a PRE-incarnate glorified body was assumed by Christ - 1 Cor. 15:13-19.

3. The resurrected body of Christ is called by Christ Himself a body of "FLESH" - Lk. 24:39 and Luke says "THIS SAME JESUS" whom they had seen and handled for 40 days ascended into heaven (Acts 1:1-2; 11) when Seve says "FLESH" cannot enter heaven.

4. The phrase "ye are my witnesses" in Isa. 43:10 are repeatedly referred to in Isaiah 43:12; 44:8 and yet what they are witnessing to is not that YHVH was "formed" but that He alone is God and there is no other God except him.

5. Seve says YHVH was formed and thus had a beginning as YHVH but scriptures repeatedly say that YHVH is ETERNAL or from everlasting to everlasting.

Whoops! Didn't know that Seve could no longer give an answer!

 

[Revmitchell]

Why do you cast your pearls before swine?

 

[The Biblicist]

I believe it is against the rules of the board to place someone's name in the title of a thread

If it is against the rules, and if I had known it was against the rules of the forum I would have never done it.

I don't know it if is against the rules. However, assuming it is, my apologies as it was not intentional on my part to violate known rules of the forum.

 

[The Biblicist]

Why do you cast your pearls before swine?

Paul tells titius to "shut their mouth" with the truth. Perhaps you had noticed that his responses were becoming fewer and farther apart.

Secondly, the truth is always good for others who may not be as capable as you are.

 

[Amy.G]

Paul tells titius to "shut their mouth" with the truth. Perhaps you had noticed that his responses were becoming fewer and farther apart.

Secondly, the truth is always good for others who may not be as capable as you are.

I understand your motivation, but the Lord's words are precious and when a person mocks them, we are told to not to continue on with them, or cast our pearls before them.

I'm glad he was finally banned though.

 

[The Biblicist]

I understand your motivation, but the Lord's words are precious and when a person mocks them, we are told to not to continue on with them, or cast our pearls before them.

I'm glad he was finally banned though.

I understand where you are coming from. There are some on this forum who could care less if anyone responds or not but keep on posting endless posts trying to influence some readers. If they are not routinely denounced some new people will come on and start swallowing their garbage if it is left without rebuke.

 

[Revmitchell]

If they are not routinely denounced some new people will come on and start swallowing their garbage if it is left without rebuke.

No they won't.

 

[The Biblicist]

No they won't.

ahh just how do you know that?

 

[Revmitchell]

ahh just how do you know that?

Actually I should ask you the same. But my answer is that our posts on the internet are insignificant beyond our own entertainment. Your threads and posts, my threads and posts mean nothing in the big scheme of this life or in the Kingdom of God.

 

[The Biblicist]

Actually I should ask you the same. But my answer is that our posts on the internet are insignificant beyond our own entertainment. Your threads and posts, my threads and posts mean nothing in the big scheme of this life or in the Kingdom of God.

You are talking about oranges while I am talking about apples. I am not concerned with the "big scheme" but only with the area of my own influence as I cannot impact any other area. On this forum there are constantly new people coming on all the time - that is a fact. The perpetrator of error on this forum was led astray by someone like him and he is now the perpretator of his errors. Standing by silent certainly provides no obstacle between the mind of a new reader and the error of the perpetrator. My responsibility within my area of influence is to be an obstacle to error and a promoter of truth as I perceive it. How you perceive personal responsibility within your area of influence is your business.

 

[billwald]

I think it has long been a web tradition that one doesn't use another list member's name in the title of a list thread.

 

[Revmitchell]

You are talking about oranges while I am talking about apples. I am not concerned with the "big scheme" but only with the area of my own influence as I cannot impact any other area. .

Good luck with that. :thumbs:

 

[The Biblicist]

Good luck with that. :thumbs:

You might need the "luck" because I can see no value to others by remaining silent in the face of perpetuated falsehoods within your area of influence.