• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Iran Must Attack Israel by 2014'Iran must attack Israel by 2014'

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
'Iran must attack Israel by 2014'
09/02/2012


Khamenei strategist releases document providing legal, religious justification for annihilation of Jewish people.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's strategist provided the legal and religious justification for the annihilation of Israel and the Jewish people, in a document published on conservative Farsi website Alef. Reports of the document began to circulate the internet this week.

The document, written by strategy specialist Alireza Forghani, outlined the reasons why, "In the name of Allah, Iran must attack Israel by 2014."

Claiming to only represent the personal opinion of its author, and not the Iranian government, the doctrine was published on a website believed to have close ties with the Ayatollah.
http://www.worthynews.com/top/jpost-com-LandedPages-PrintArticle-aspx-id-257112/

This time he thinks he has the legal and religious justification to annihilate Israel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jedi Knight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If Mexico's drug lords wanted a nuke program would we take a wait and see while they were assembling it?
 

Squidward

Member
Israel will beat them into submission before Iran has a shot. Despite them being muslim, I find it strange that a non-Arab state is taking such a strong stance against Israel.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Israel will beat them into submission before Iran has a shot. Despite them being muslim, I find it strange that a non-Arab state is taking such a strong stance against Israel.
It is the Muslims in general. Islam makes up more than one billion of the world's population, approximately 20%. It is the fastest growing religion in America, and in the world. It has always been their goal "to drive Israel into the Sea." They consider America as the Great Satan, and Israel as the Little Satan." There are many in Al-Qaeda that are not Arabs, but are dedicated Muslims.
In their world view, Islam wants to be the one world religion.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Islam is Like a Cancerous Cell...

It is the Muslims in general. Islam makes up more than one billion of the world's population, approximately 20%. It is the fastest growing religion in America, and in the world. It has always been their goal "to drive Israel into the Sea." They consider America as the Great Satan, and Israel as the Little Satan." There are many in Al-Qaeda that are not Arabs, but are dedicated Muslims.
In their world view, Islam wants to be the one world religion.

...that has its tentacles stretched and attached to almost every part of the world. If the world were to go to war with the Nation of Islam, it would have to be seriously concerned with the dormant cells throughout the social infrastructure of each nation in which it has established itself.

The world needs to be concerned, because it is not just my belief, but the belief of many, that Islam has taught its followers to be loyal to a fault, and there could be serious disruptions within each country where they have established their presence. Imagine a nation that is concentrating on fighting a war with Islam on Muslim's own soil, while within its own society, bloody riots and religious uprisings serve to drain on all aspects of that nation's national defense.

I call the innocent growth of the Muslim people the Trojan Horse Syndrome! This kind of scenario could seriously weaken any nation to the point of having to succumb to Islam, which has unleashed its Trojan Horse weapon over a massive invasion plan that took several generations to accomplish. A complacent West, that is given over to political correctness and the desire to be tolerant, could be their own undoing in the end. And like Islam has been so proclaimed, they will be the one-day rule the world.

Unfortunately, the threat of Islam does leave the leadership of any nation and its social fabric with two options: 1) live in a state of paranoia or 2) trust in the teachings of tolerance and political correctness.

A third option is to be accepting of all religions and all people, but, not to the point that a nation's guard is let down. The problem is, how does one succeed at implementing this kind of readiness with alienating some, within their nation, by enforcing laws that keep an eye on the activities of the potential threat from within?

That my friend is the million dollar question!
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Additional Info for My Response!

...that has its tentacles stretched and attached to almost every part of the world. If the world were to go to war with the Nation of Islam, it would have to be seriously concerned with the dormant cells throughout the social infrastructure of each nation in which it has established itself.

The world needs to be concerned, because it is not just my belief, but the belief of many, that Islam has taught its followers to be loyal to a fault, and there could be serious disruptions within each country where they have established their presence. Imagine a nation that is concentrating on fighting a war with Islam on Muslim's own soil, while within its own society, bloody riots and religious uprisings serve to drain on all aspects of that nation's national defense.

I call the innocent growth of the Muslim people the Trojan Horse Syndrome! This kind of scenario could seriously weaken any nation to the point of having to succumb to Islam, which has unleashed its Trojan Horse weapon over a massive invasion plan that took several generations to accomplish. A complacent West, that is given over to political correctness and the desire to be tolerant, could be their own undoing in the end. And like Islam has been so proclaimed, they will be the one-day rule the world.

Unfortunately, the threat of Islam does leave the leadership of any nation and its social fabric with two options: 1) live in a state of paranoia or 2) trust in the teachings of tolerance and political correctness.

A third option is to be accepting of all religions and all people, but, not to the point that a nation's guard is let down. The problem is, how does one succeed at implementing this kind of readiness with alienating some, within their nation, by enforcing laws that keep an eye on the activities of the potential threat from within?

That my friend is the million dollar question!

Please check out this sight, as it will support what I have claimed above: http://link.brightcove.com/services...1a3UMdKnLpH9aM8Fv&bclid=0&bctid=1271237687001
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
The battle of Gog and Magog is closer than we realize. Israel will strike first, IMO. Christ's return could be sooner rather than later.
 

J.D.

Active Member
Site Supporter
Something for you all to think about: If Muslims are universal in their hatred of Israel, why can't they form a coalition strong enough to carry out their evil intentions? Do you think Iran is a threat to Israel in a one-on-one confrontation? And, if Iran attacks Israel, what well-armed nation will join with them? Turkey? Get serious.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Something for you all to think about: If Muslims are universal in their hatred of Israel, why can't they form a coalition strong enough to carry out their evil intentions? Do you think Iran is a threat to Israel in a one-on-one confrontation? And, if Iran attacks Israel, what well-armed nation will join with them? Turkey? Get serious.

Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't. Its been prophecied already. The Restrainer is keeping it from happening until the right time.
 

revmwc

Well-Known Member
Ezekial 38 and 39 coming to take a spoil but turned back to the valley of
Hamon near the city of Hamonah.

Eze.. 38: 8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.
9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm, thou shalt be like a cloud to cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with thee.
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.

Notice what this battle is about, verse 12 to take a spoil. Not just Iran will be coming in, Israel will still be in existence and not annihilated. God turns them back.

Eze. 39:2 And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel


This is not the valley of Meggido
Ezekial 39:
15 And the passengers that pass through the land, when any seeth a man's bone, then shall he set up a sign by it, till the buriers have buried it in the valley of Hamongog.

16 And also the name of the city shall be Hamonah. Thus shall they cleanse the land.

So this doesn't apply to the battle of Armageddon

Revelation 16: 13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
16 And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.

Is this what we see from the 7 vials being opened and the Euphraties drieng up? From Revelation 16.
 

J.D.

Active Member
Site Supporter
Another question comes to mind: How does the Arab threat against Israel differ from the Roman threat in the first century? How do we know that the destruction of the temple and the city in 70 a.d. was not the Jewish Armeggedon?
 

revmwc

Well-Known Member
Another question comes to mind: How does the Arab threat against Israel differ from the Roman threat in the first century? How do we know that the destruction of the temple and the city in 70 a.d. was not the Jewish Armeggedon?

We know by what Ezekial says that battle hasnn't taken place as it makes it clear Israel will be burying the dead after this battle, and it was Israel that was destroyed and not Gog and Magog, Jerusalem was destroyed the battle wasn't in the Valley of Hamongog and it is not called that right now. Fairly clear the 70 A.D. destruction doesn't apply to the Ezekial 38 and 39 battle. In fact God says Israel is living in peace Ezekial 38:11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
I don't believe Israel was in unwalled cities, nor at rest aand dwelling safely nor a city with no bars and no gates in 70 A.D.
Very much the opposite of what Ezekial describes.
I don't believe this applies to 70 A.D. EZE 38:8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.

Israel hadn't been gathered out of many people in 70 A.D. they had come our the Babylonian captivity but were n't scattered as they were after 70 A.D.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Something for you all to think about: If Muslims are universal in their hatred of Israel, why can't they form a coalition strong enough to carry out their evil intentions? Do you think Iran is a threat to Israel in a one-on-one confrontation? And, if Iran attacks Israel, what well-armed nation will join with them? Turkey? Get serious.
Iran has been working behind the scenes. He has called for a Jihad against Israel, and is trying to get a consensus of Islamic nations behind him to attack and take out Israel.
 

mandym

New Member
Something for you all to think about: If Muslims are universal in their hatred of Israel, why can't they form a coalition strong enough to carry out their evil intentions? Do you think Iran is a threat to Israel in a one-on-one confrontation? And, if Iran attacks Israel, what well-armed nation will join with them? Turkey? Get serious.

To deny the very real threats in the world lacks sobriety.
 

NiteShift

New Member
Something for you all to think about: If Muslims are universal in their hatred of Israel, why can't they form a coalition strong enough to carry out their evil intentions?

They tried, in 1948 and 1967. Since the conventional war scenario didn't turn out well for them they have been using guerilla warfare.

J.D. said:
Do you think Iran is a threat to Israel in a one-on-one confrontation?

Well hezbollah, an Iranian and Syrian creation, have been attacking Israel for 30 years. They won't accomplish any outright defeat of Israel but keep them off-balance. And also have managed to win the PR battle in much of the world's eyes. Now if Iran's mullahs get nukes the entire situation changes.
 

J.D.

Active Member
Site Supporter
So maybe the end of the world will be in 2012......just say'n. :jesus:
Well, the end of the world MIGHT be this afternoon. So if it happens this afternoon, it's a prophecy, right? But if it doesn't happen, then I'm not a false prophet because I said that it "might" happen, not that it "will" happen. right?
 
Top