Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Is the Republican Nomination over?
True - Romney does not yet have the majority of delegates needed - but it appears that with the win in Ill - he pretty much has it sewn up.
thoughts?
That is an excellent post. Conscience to me trumps the Republican Party. I have noticed the deterioration of the Republican nominee since Reagan left office. I voted for Bush, Dole, and finally McCain. I decided McCain was the last straw on the road to liberalism for me. The Republicans did not continue the slow march towards being Democrats this time, they took a giant leap.Actually, your two things are slightly incorrect: Your not voting for Romney will guarantee Obama's election.
There are four ways to vote at this time: for Obama; against Obama (meaning, the candidate with the highest likelihood of beating him -- which, at this point, is Romney); voting in such a way that Obama will win (i.e., voting for a candidate that doesn't have a chance of actually winning); OR, not voting at all (which in effect means you voted for the winner, since you didn't use your voting power to keep that individual out of office, or get that individual in office).
Of the first 3, 2 mean Obama will win.
My recommendation to all: Vote your conscience. Decide for yourself if your conscience will allow you to sleep by knowing that you helped Obama get re-elected, and thus subjecting you, your family, and your friends to 4 more years.
While it looks like I'm trying to make a case for voting against Obama, I personally haven't decided which way I'm going to vote.
Is the Republican Nomination over?
True - Romney does not yet have the majority of delegates needed - but it appears that with the win in Ill - he pretty much has it sewn up.
thoughts?
That's the way I see it as well. Those who refuse to vote for the opponent of Obama are essentially voting for Obama whether they want to admit it or not. It's great voting for the person you want in there, but in all honesty none of the GOP candidates get my vote on this principle alone. What do I do then? Those so opposed to the "lesser of two evils" approach are doing the exact same thing if they vote for Santorum or Paul, as neither is a true conservative.Here's my take on the election.
The U.S. is in dire need. To use a metaphor, the country is like a patient in the Emergency Room. The patient is bleeding and is in deep trouble. Surgery needs to be performed. There are two doctors on call, one is a general practitioner named Obama with no surgical experience. The other is a first year surgeon named Romney. The totally competent surgeon is named <insert your favorite candidate's name> and is off duty, in fact is on sabbatical.
Who are you going to select to perform surgery on the patient? At least to keep the patient alive until more help can be administered?
It's amazing the lengths some go to justify having to vote for a terrible candidate because one is devoted to a failed two-party approach.
It's amazing the lengths some go to justify having to vote for a terrible candidate because one is devoted to a failed two-party approach.
Here's my take on the election.
The U.S. is in dire need. To use a metaphor, the country is like a patient in the Emergency Room. The patient is bleeding and is in deep trouble. Surgery needs to be performed. There are two doctors on call, one is a general practitioner named Obama with no surgical experience. The other is a first year surgeon named Romney. The totally competent surgeon is named <insert your favorite candidate's name> and is off duty, in fact is on sabbatical.
Who are you going to select to perform surgery on the patient? At least to keep the patient alive until more help can be administered?
It's amazing the lengths some go to justify having to vote for a terrible candidate because one is devoted to a failed two-party approach.
Yes it is, and I only came to that conclusion after the results came in tonight. I have two thoughts. One is that this guarantees the reelection of Obama, and two, I would not vote for Romney.
Actually, your two things are slightly incorrect: Your not voting for Romney will guarantee Obama's election.
There are four ways to vote at this time: for Obama; against Obama (meaning, the candidate with the highest likelihood of beating him -- which, at this point, is Romney); voting in such a way that Obama will win (i.e., voting for a candidate that doesn't have a chance of actually winning); OR, not voting at all (which in effect means you voted for the winner, since you didn't use your voting power to keep that individual out of office, or get that individual in office).
Of the first 3, 2 mean Obama will win.
My recommendation to all: Vote your conscience. Decide for yourself if your conscience will allow you to sleep by knowing that you helped Obama get re-elected, and thus subjecting you, your family, and your friends to 4 more years.
While it looks like I'm trying to make a case for voting against Obama, I personally haven't decided which way I'm going to vote.
Those who refuse to vote for the opponent of Obama are essentially voting for Obama whether they want to admit it or not.
Until the Republicans can find a way to keep DEM's from crossing over and voting in their primary when the DEM's won't have one it is. Illinois, the Presidents home state really.